Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Point the user towards tcpdump for logging individual queries #376

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 23, 2024

Conversation

hills
Copy link
Contributor

@hills hills commented Aug 22, 2024

The lack of logging is explained, but appears to assume the user is interested in aggregate log. For simple debugging there is no equivalent to "log-queries" (or "log-replies") in unbound(8).

If the method described in [*] is the recommended one then it should be documented as such and also saves time.

It's not clear to me what the difference between doc/*.rst and doc/README is. This patch assumes README is already out of date.

[*] https://lists.nlnetlabs.nl/pipermail/nsd-users/2020-June/002880.html

The lack of logging is explained, but appears to assume the user is
interested in aggregate log. For simple debugging there is no equivalent
to "log-queries" (or "log-replies") in unbound(8).

If the method described in [*] is the recommended one then it should be
documented as such and also saves time.

It's not clear to me what the difference between doc/*.rst and doc/README
is. This patch assumes README is already out of date.

[*] https://lists.nlnetlabs.nl/pipermail/nsd-users/2020-June/002880.html
Copy link
Member

@wcawijngaards wcawijngaards left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Additional documentation is useful. Thank you for the contribution!

@wcawijngaards wcawijngaards merged commit df19159 into NLnetLabs:master Aug 23, 2024
3 checks passed
wcawijngaards added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants