Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature]: Prepare for release of NWB schema 2.8.0 #628

Closed
2 tasks done
rly opened this issue Nov 20, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #630
Closed
2 tasks done

[Feature]: Prepare for release of NWB schema 2.8.0 #628

rly opened this issue Nov 20, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #630
Assignees
Labels
category: proposal discussion of proposed enhancements or new features priority: medium non-critical problem and/or affecting only a small set of NWB users topic: nwb-schema related to nwb-schemas, namespaces and type implementations

Comments

@rly
Copy link
Contributor

rly commented Nov 20, 2024

What would you like to see added to MatNWB?

NWB schema 2.8.0 is planned for release this week (ideally tomorrow).

Can you check that MatNWB works with this schema before release? It is available on this branch: NeurodataWithoutBorders/nwb-schema#597

Here is the changelog from 2.7.0:

Major changes

  • Deprecated EventWaveform neurodata type.
  • Deprecated ImageMaskSeries neurodata type.

Minor changes

  • Added optional was_generated_by attribute to NWBFile to store provenance information.
  • Made band_mean and band_std in DecompositionSeries optional.
  • Added Device.model_number, Device.model_name, Device.serial_number.

Is your feature request related to a problem?

No response

What solution would you like?

Verification that MatNWB will work with NWB schema 2.8.0

Do you have any interest in helping implement the feature?

No.

Code of Conduct

@rly rly added category: proposal discussion of proposed enhancements or new features priority: medium non-critical problem and/or affecting only a small set of NWB users topic: nwb-schema related to nwb-schemas, namespaces and type implementations labels Nov 20, 2024
@ehennestad
Copy link
Collaborator

#630

All test pass except for one which depends on pynwb being updated to work with nwb 2.8.0 schemas

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
category: proposal discussion of proposed enhancements or new features priority: medium non-critical problem and/or affecting only a small set of NWB users topic: nwb-schema related to nwb-schemas, namespaces and type implementations
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants