testers: add more parameters, add testVersion to my maintained packages

[Atemu]

Description of changes

When any aspect of the command to show the version needed to change, the entire
command would have to be declared in full. This allows directly customising
those aspects individually.

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 24.05 Release Notes (or backporting 23.05 and 23.11 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

---

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

[nbraud]

Great work! I do have a little feedback, but other than that and needing tests I'd approve it.

[Atemu]

Thank you all for the feedback, I still intend to continue this but it may take a bit.

[nbraud]

Thank you all for the feedback, I still intend to continue this but it may take a bit.

If you are too busy, or are getting overwhelmed in any way, I can also address the feedback myself and merge.

It's also fine if you want to do it yourself and need time for whatever reason, I just wanted to make clear you have the option to let us do the rest: after all, teamwork makes the dream work ❤️

[Atemu]

I'm not overwhelmed or anything, it's just not very high on my priority list right now. If anyone wants to take over this (or any of my other PRs for that matter), they should feel absolutely welcome to do so. You're not stealing anything away from me here ;)

[nbraud]

Rebased to address merge conflict

Addressed my own comments

[nbraud]

For ease of review, I avoided introducing changes in @Atemu's commits, but the fixup! commit will need to be squashed in before merging.

@roberth, could you review my changes? Are the tests sufficient?

[Atemu]

If the commits touching my packages are causing any issue, feel free to drop them. I can put those in a separate PR following this one.

[nbraud]

If the commits touching my packages are causing any issue, feel free to drop them. I can put those in a separate PR following this one.

They aren't, don't worry <3
The only fixup! commit is applying one of the suggestions I made during the first round of review

[nbraud]

The build issue on x86_64-darwin seems unrelated:

error: a 'x86_64-linux' with features {} is required to build '/nix/store/0w4d3xh6ykidx2k473djpxplnhyp8ph9-Xresources-Xft.drv', but I am a 'x86_64-darwin' with features {benchmark, big-parallel, nixos-test}