Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

catboost: use llvm 14 for cuda & format with nixfmt-rfc-style #333562

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

RossComputerGuy
Copy link
Member

Description of changes

Upgrade to a newer LLVM version for CUDA (related #305146), format so CI doesn't complain.

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 24.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.11 and 24.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@@ -19707,6 +19707,7 @@ with pkgs;
catboost = callPackage ../development/libraries/catboost {
# https://github.com/catboost/catboost/issues/2540
cudaPackages = cudaPackages_11;
llvmPackagesCuda = llvmPackages_14;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah ideally we'd accommodate in cudaPackages (the same logic that handles gcc version ranges) but admittedly that might take a non-trivial refactoring and it's ok to postpone it. CC @NixOS/cuda-maintainers

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants