Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft: [14.0][MIG] mrp_kit_drop_ship #1281

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: 14.0
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

KKamaa
Copy link
Contributor

@KKamaa KKamaa commented Jun 7, 2024

A forward port from ForgeFlow's mrp_kit_drop_ship

@thomaspaulb
Copy link
Contributor

@KKamaa They found a bug in production and I fixed it with the last commit, I think this can move out of Draft now

Without this module, if a product is being procured and has an existing Bill of
Materials of type Kit, the components of the product are going to be
procured, instead of the main product.

This module introduces the capability to ignore the existence of the kit
during procurement, when the procurement is associated with a dropship. That
is, when the product is going to be sourced from a third party vendor to the
customer.

Upon confirmation of the purchase order the system will still explode the
product into components within the drop ship picking.
Copy link

@JBvandermeulen JBvandermeulen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Works well for us functionally

Copy link

@JBvandermeulen JBvandermeulen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Works well for us functionally

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR has the approved label and has been created more than 5 days ago. It should therefore be ready to merge by a maintainer (or a PSC member if the concerned addon has no declared maintainer). 🤖

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants