Draft PR - nextlink encode #2199
Draft
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
mikepizzo
requested changes
Jul 7, 2020
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Rather than pass in a boolean for whether or not to encode, which is going to be hard for the service to decide, can we just add logic to DefaultSkipTokenHandler to encode any date, string, or other values that may have suspect characters? See similar logic in PR #2197.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issues
Draft PR for nextlink
This pull request fixes issue #xxx.
Description
Briefly describe the changes of this pull request.
Checklist (Uncheck if it is not completed)
Additional work necessary
If documentation update is needed, please add "Docs Needed" label to the issue and provide details about the required document change in the issue.