Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

detect/sip.stat_code: Correct sticky buffer name #12145

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jlucovsky
Copy link
Contributor

Issue: 7295

The sticky buffer name was incorrectly set to method; this commit fixes the name typo with stat_code.

SV_REPO=
SV_BRANCH=OISF/suricata-verify#2072
SU_REPO=
SU_BRANCH=
LIBHTP_REPO=
LIBHTP_BRANCH=

Issue: 7295

The sticky buffer name was incorrectly set to method; this commit fixes
the name typo with stat_code.
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 23, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 83.09%. Comparing base (c3aa3ae) to head (b5564cf).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main-7.0.x.

Additional details and impacted files
@@              Coverage Diff               @@
##           main-7.0.x   #12145      +/-   ##
==============================================
- Coverage       83.27%   83.09%   -0.18%     
==============================================
  Files             922      922              
  Lines          260794   260794              
==============================================
- Hits           217177   216718     -459     
- Misses          43617    44076     +459     
Flag Coverage Δ
fuzzcorpus 64.12% <100.00%> (-0.26%) ⬇️
suricata-verify 63.19% <100.00%> (-0.13%) ⬇️
unittests 62.38% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

---- 🚨 Try these New Features:

@suricata-qa
Copy link

Information: QA ran without warnings.

Pipeline 23504

@victorjulien
Copy link
Member

Merged in #12146, thanks!

@jlucovsky jlucovsky deleted the 7295/1 branch November 25, 2024 13:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants