Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

P2897 (aligned_accessor): Update to R2 #461

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

mhoemmen
Copy link
Contributor

@mhoemmen mhoemmen commented Jul 10, 2024

@crtrott @dalg24 Update based on discussion with David Sankel. I submitted this as P2897R2 on 2024/07/12.

Update: Please merge this before the R3 PR #463 ; thanks!

Update based on further discussion with David Sankel.

* Rename `is_checkably_valid` to `detectably_invalid`
    (with inverted return value)

* Ask LEWG to consider the alternative design that makes
    `is_sufficiently_aligned` a nonmember function in `<bit>`
    instead of a member function of `aligned_accessor`,
    while LWG review of R2 proceeds concurrently

* P2389R2 was voted into the Working Draft at St. Louis,
    so replace use of `dextents` in examples with `dims`.

* Minor formatting and non-wording fixes
Add non-wording section explaining why `aligned_accessor`
has no `explicit` constructor from less to more alignment.
@mhoemmen
Copy link
Contributor Author

Superseded by PR #466 .

@mhoemmen mhoemmen closed this Oct 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant