Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CI(deps): Update dependency pystac_client to v0.8.5 #1226

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: grass8
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Oct 16, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
pystac_client (changelog) ==0.8.3 -> ==0.8.5 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

stac-utils/pystac-client (pystac_client)

v0.8.5

Compare Source

Fixed
  • Use urljoin to build hrefs #​746

v0.8.4

Compare Source

Added
  • Support for collection search via CollectionSearch class and associated client methods #​735
Removed

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/pystac_client-0.x branch from ae11435 to 8850936 Compare October 23, 2024 14:31
@renovate renovate bot changed the title CI(deps): Update dependency pystac_client to v0.8.4 CI(deps): Update dependency pystac_client to v0.8.5 Oct 23, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/pystac_client-0.x branch from 8850936 to 041c1e6 Compare November 25, 2024 12:36
@echoix
Copy link
Member

echoix commented Nov 25, 2024

This removes Python 3.9 support. Shouldn't we have some version ranges? @cwhite911

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant