Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add option to create indices from existingConfigmap #153

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: feature/11.4
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ck-netlution
Copy link

Currently the Helm Chart supports creating new repositories via an existing ConfigMap. For deploying GraphDB as IaC this is quite useful. Unfortunately, there is no way to create indices at install time.

This adds the option to provide a existing ConfigMap via values and create an index for one or multiple repositories.

The ConfigMap has to consist out of keys that have the same name as the repository. The value is the SPARQL query.

@rdstn rdstn requested review from yaskoo and mihailradkov and removed request for yaskoo January 6, 2025 16:39
@mihailradkov mihailradkov changed the base branch from main to feature/11.4 January 8, 2025 09:49
Currently the Helm Chart supports creating new repositories via an
existing ConfigMap. For deploying GraphDB as IaC this is quite useful.
Unfortunately, there is no way to create indices at install time.

This adds the option to provide a existing ConfigMap via values and
create an index for one or multiple repositories.

The ConfigMap has to consist out of keys that have the same name as the
repository. The value is the SPARQL query.
files/scripts/graphdb.sh Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
values.yaml Outdated
################################

indices:
# Optional configmap containing indices configuration .ttl file(s).
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The description is not accurate, the job does not expect .ttl files or other repo configurations.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I change the description to reflect the fact that the name is the repository name and the contents are the SPARQL query in ttl format.

# Custom Lucene Configurations #
################################

indices:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

BTW, this could be used for all kinds of SPARQL update queries. I provisioned a repository with some statements using this. However, it should be used with care as each helm upgrade would trigger the job.

We could merge this as is for now and make it a more generic functionality in the next major release.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sounds good! Our use-case was purely indices but I can imagine other queries to be useful. I took inspiration from provision-repositories. Ideally queries should be idempotent to work well with upgrades.

If you make it generic, it might be a good idea to use index creation as an example how a configmap should look like.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants