Draft: fit_curve and predict_curve

[ValentinaHutter]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #57 (8e82b61) into main (8bbb322) will increase coverage by 1.14%.
The diff coverage is 75.43%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #57      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   58.25%   59.39%   +1.14%     
==========================================
  Files          22       23       +1     
  Lines         800      857      +57     
==========================================
+ Hits          466      509      +43     
- Misses        334      348      +14     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...s_dask/process_implementations/ml/curve_fitting.py	75.43% <75.43%> (ø)

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

[clausmichele]

I do not see much difference with the previous implementation of fit_curve and predict_curve here https://github.com/Open-EO/openeo-processes-python/blob/7407d8d28433978aa47749707e2122ba0f709c11/src/openeo_processes/cubes.py#L623

Do you think this will be enough to produce a result on a large area? Are there improvements planned?

[ValentinaHutter]

The intention of this PR was just to get to feature parity with the old processes implementation, so this did not really change. Updates on the scalability will be adressed in a separate PR.

[LukeWeidenwalker]

Closing in favor of #139