Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add repl_connect_status to pika_exporter #2961

Merged

Conversation

cheniujh
Copy link
Collaborator

@cheniujh cheniujh commented Dec 3, 2024

本PR将pika info指标中提供的repl_connect_status加入到了pika_exporter, 该指标的值域以及映射如下:

no_connect: 0,
try_to_incr_sync: 1,
try_to_full_sync: 2,
syncing_full: 3,
connecting: 4,
connected: 5,
error: -1,

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new parser for converting status metrics into gauge values, enhancing metric collection accuracy.
    • Added a metric for monitoring replication connection status specifically for slave nodes in Pika server environments.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling and logging during metric parsing to ensure better reporting of issues.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 3, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new parser type, statusToGaugeParser, that processes metrics related to status-to-gauge mappings, enhancing the existing parsing framework without altering its structure. Additionally, a new metric configuration is added to monitor replication connection status for slave nodes in a Pika server environment, integrating a regex parser to extract relevant data and maintain existing configurations.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
tools/pika_exporter/exporter/metrics/parser.go Added new type statusToGaugeParser with method Parse for processing metrics and error handling.
tools/pika_exporter/exporter/metrics/replication.go Introduced new metric configuration "slave_info>=3.5.5_or_4.0.0" for monitoring slave node replication status.

Poem

🐇 In the land of code where metrics play,
A new parser hops in to save the day.
With gauges and statuses, all in a line,
Replication's secrets, now easy to find!
So let’s cheer for the changes, both big and small,
In the garden of code, we celebrate all! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the ✏️ Feature New feature or request label Dec 3, 2024
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
tools/pika_exporter/version.go (1)

4-7: Consider Updating Version Information Dynamically During Build

Hardcoding build metadata such as BuildVersion, BuildCommitSha, BuildDate, and GoVersion can lead to inconsistencies and outdated information. It's a best practice to populate these fields dynamically during the build process using build flags.

Consider modifying the build process to inject these values. For example, in your Makefile or build script, you could use:

go build -ldflags "-X main.BuildVersion=$(VERSION) -X main.BuildCommitSha=$(COMMIT_SHA) -X 'main.BuildDate=$(BUILD_DATE)' -X 'main.GoVersion=$(GO_VERSION)'" -o your_binary

And in your code, you can keep the variables uninitialized:

var (
    BuildVersion   string
    BuildCommitSha string
    BuildDate      string
    GoVersion      string
)

This ensures the version information is accurate and reflects the actual build.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7c155a5 and 49f2b9a.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • tools/pika_exporter/exporter/metrics/parser.go (1 hunks)
  • tools/pika_exporter/exporter/metrics/replication.go (1 hunks)
  • tools/pika_exporter/version.go (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
tools/pika_exporter/exporter/metrics/replication.go (2)

185-195: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Potential Regex Misinterpretation and Status Mapping Issues

The regular expression used may not account for all possible whitespace variations or unexpected input formats. Additionally, the status mapping assumes that all statuses are accounted for, but unrecognized statuses default to 0, which could mask issues.

Consider updating the regex pattern to be more robust and adding handling for unexpected statuses. Apply this diff:

                 reg:  regexp.MustCompile(`(?m)^\s*(?P<db_name>db\d+)\s*:\s*(?P<status>\w+)\s*$`),
                 Parser: &statusToGaugeParser{
                     statusMapping: map[string]int{
                         "no_connect":          0,
                         "try_to_incr_sync":    1,
                         "try_to_full_sync":    2,
                         "syncing_full":        3,
                         "connecting":          4,
                         "connected":           5,
                         "error":               -1,
+                        // Add any missing statuses here
                     },
+                },
+                // Add handling for unexpected statuses
+                Parser: &normalParser{},
             },

Also, ensure that any unexpected or new statuses are logged appropriately and handled to prevent silent failures.

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


178-206: Duplicate Metric Configurations Detected

The new metric "slave_info>=3.5.5_or_4.0.0" might overlap with existing configurations for slave information metrics. Ensure that there are no conflicting parsers that might process the same data differently.

Run the following script to check for overlapping metric names and configurations:

If any metric names appear in the output, consider consolidating or renaming them to avoid conflicts.

tools/pika_exporter/exporter/metrics/parser.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@cheniujh cheniujh force-pushed the add_repl_connect_status_exporter branch from 49f2b9a to 62b1fca Compare December 4, 2024 12:11
@chejinge chejinge added the 4.0.2 label Dec 6, 2024
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
tools/pika_exporter/exporter/metrics/parser.go (2)

19-21: Add documentation for the new type.

Consider adding a doc comment explaining the purpose and usage of statusToGaugeParser. This will help other developers understand how to use this parser for status-to-gauge mappings.

Add this documentation above the type declaration:

+// statusToGaugeParser converts string status values to gauge metrics using a predefined mapping.
+// It is used for metrics that represent states or status values as numeric gauges.
 type statusToGaugeParser struct {
     statusMapping map[string]int
 }

23-61: LGTM with suggestions for improvement.

The implementation is well-structured and handles edge cases appropriately. Consider these improvements:

  1. Add debug logging for successful status mappings to aid in troubleshooting.
  2. Consider adding validation for the statusMapping field to ensure it's not nil.

Here's a suggested improvement:

 func (p *statusToGaugeParser) Parse(m MetricMeta, c Collector, opt ParseOption) {
+    if p.statusMapping == nil {
+        log.Warnf("statusToGaugeParser::Parse status mapping is nil. metricName:%s", m.Name)
+        return
+    }
     m.Lookup(func(m MetaData) {
         // ... existing code ...
                 metric.Value = float64(mappedValue)
+                log.Debugf("statusToGaugeParser::Parse mapped status. metricName:%s status:%s value:%d",
+                    m.Name, v, mappedValue)
             }
         }
         // ... existing code ...
     })
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 49f2b9a and b306350.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • tools/pika_exporter/exporter/metrics/parser.go (1 hunks)
  • tools/pika_exporter/exporter/metrics/replication.go (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • tools/pika_exporter/exporter/metrics/replication.go
🔇 Additional comments (2)
tools/pika_exporter/exporter/metrics/parser.go (2)

57-59: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix error argument in log.Errorf

The error logging statement uses m.ValueName instead of err, which will result in incorrect error messages.

Apply this diff to fix the error logging:

             if err := c.Collect(metric); err != nil {
                 log.Errorf("statusToGaugeParser::Parse metric collect failed. metric:%#v err:%s",
-                    m, m.ValueName)
+                    m, err)
             }

19-61: Implementation aligns with PR objectives.

The statusToGaugeParser implementation effectively supports the repl_connect_status metric requirements:

  • Can handle all specified status mappings (no_connect:0, try_to_incr_sync:1, etc.)
  • Provides appropriate default value (0) for unknown statuses
  • Includes error handling and logging for troubleshooting

Let's verify the usage of this parser:

✅ Verification successful

Implementation aligns with PR objectives and is properly configured

The verification confirms that the statusToGaugeParser is correctly implemented and configured in replication.go:

  • Status mapping is properly defined with all required states: no_connect(0), try_to_incr_sync(1), try_to_full_sync(2), syncing_full(3), connecting(4), connected(5), error(-1)
  • The parser is correctly integrated into the metrics configuration for repl_connect_status metric
  • The metric is properly configured with appropriate labels (addr, alias, db_name) and help text
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the configuration and usage of statusToGaugeParser for repl_connect_status

# Check for metric configuration
rg -l "repl_connect_status" .

# Check for status mapping initialization
ast-grep --pattern 'statusMapping = map[string]int{
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 199


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual implementation and usage of statusToGaugeParser

# Check replication.go for the metric configuration and parser usage
cat tools/pika_exporter/exporter/metrics/replication.go

# Search for any other status mapping initialization patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'map[string]int{$$$}'

Length of output: 12252

@chejinge chejinge added the 3.5.6 label Dec 6, 2024
@chejinge chejinge merged commit 7fcb916 into OpenAtomFoundation:unstable Dec 11, 2024
17 checks passed
chejinge pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 30, 2024
* add repl_connect_status to pika_exporter
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
3.5.6 4.0.2 ✏️ Feature New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants