feat:4.0.2 changelog && add some test #2977
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces new test cases for Redis list operations in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
github-actions
bot
added
✏️ Feature
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
tests/integration/list_test.go (3)
Line range hint
1300-1316: Consider renaming the test case to better reflect its purpose.The current test name "should lpush and rpushx" doesn't fully capture that it's also testing type mismatch error handling.
Consider renaming to something like:
-It("should lpush and rpushx", func() { +It("should handle lpush, rpushx and verify type mismatch errors", func() {
1318-1328: LGTM! Well-structured test case with good coverage.The test effectively verifies LPUSH with multiple values and confirms the correct list order.
Consider translating the Chinese comment to English for consistency:
- // LPUSH 操作 + // LPUSH operation
1330-1353: LGTM! Comprehensive test for circular RPOPLPUSH.The test effectively verifies the behavior of RPOPLPUSH when using the same list as source and destination.
Consider adding a comment explaining the expected behavior:
+ // Test RPOPLPUSH with same source and destination list + // This should move elements from the tail to the head of the list, + // effectively rotating the list one position at a time // 初始化列表
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
tests/integration/list_test.go(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
tests/integration/list_test.go (1)
1301-1302: LGTM! Good error handling test.
The added error assertions correctly verify that a list key cannot be accessed as a string.
github-actions
bot
added
the
📒 Documentation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (8)
CHANGELOG.MD (6)
1-1: Consider normalizing version headers' casing and spacing."V4.0.2" is capitalized differently than later versions which use lowercase "v". For consistency, you might consider using a single format (e.g., "v4.0.2" or "V4.0.2") throughout the file.
5-5: Ensure clarity in referencing PRs and user handles.While referencing PRs such as “#2973” is helpful, consider always wrapping them in Markdown link syntax for a consistent reading experience: #2973
29-29: Eliminate bare URLs to conform with Markdown best practices.Static analysis hints (MD034) flagged bare URLs. Replace them with Markdown links. For example:
[#2557](https://github.com/OpenAtomFoundation/pika/pull/2557)instead of
https://github.com/OpenAtomFoundation/pika/pull/2557🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.37.0)
29-29: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
37-37: Maintain consistent bullet list style across entries.Currently, you have some lines like “- Fixed the
rpoplpushcommand…” and others with a different structure. Consider adopting a consistent bullet point format for better readability.
43-43: Use a capital letter after the dash for each bullet.Some lines begin with a lowercase letter after the dash. For a more polished changelog, capitalize them consistently to match the rest of the bullet points.
52-52: Wrap up section with a summary or next steps.After the final bullet point, consider adding a concluding note or “What’s next” section to guide users on how these updates affect them or reference further documentation.
CHANGELOG_CN.MD (2)
7-7: Unify "Pika-Operater" naming.In lines 7, 13, and 15, "Pika-Operater" is inconsistent with other places referencing "Pika-Operator." It’s preferable to standardize on "Pika-Operator" for clarity and consistency.
To fix:
- Pika-Operater + Pika-OperatorAlso applies to: 13-13, 15-15
17-17: Correct "Pika-Expoter" spelling."Pika-Expoter" is likely a misspelling of "Pika-Exporter." Consider making this correction for clarity.
- Pika-Expoter + Pika-Exporter🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.37.0)
17-17: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
CHANGELOG.MD(1 hunks)CHANGELOG_CN.MD(1 hunks)tests/integration/list_test.go(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- tests/integration/list_test.go
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Markdownlint (0.37.0)
CHANGELOG.MD
29-29: null
Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
CHANGELOG_CN.MD
13-13: null
Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
15-15: null
Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
17-17: null
Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
CHANGELOG.MD (1)
49-49: Confirm numbering and grouping of bullet points.
Currently, bullet points are visually enumerated under each heading but appear to be random. Consider grouping related items (e.g., replication fixes under a single list) for better clarity.
CHANGELOG_CN.MD (1)
13-13: Review potential bare URL lint warnings.
The static analysis reports warnings about bare URLs at lines 13, 15, and 17 (MD034). However, these lines actually contain valid Markdown-style links like #2860. This appears to be a false positive you can safely ignore. No change needed in those lines unless you prefer an alternate link style.
Also applies to: 15-15, 17-17
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.37.0)
13-13: null
Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
CHANGELOG_CN.MD (1)
1-50: LGTM! Well-structured changelog with good organization.The changelog is well-organized with clear sections for new features, improvements, and bug fixes. Each entry has proper PR links and contributor attributions.
Consider adding the release date for version 4.0.2 to help users track when changes were made.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.37.0)
13-13: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
15-15: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
17-17: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
CHANGELOG.MD (1)
1-50: LGTM! Well-structured changelog with good organization.The changelog is well-organized with clear sections for new features, improvements, and bug fixes. Each entry has proper PR links and contributor attributions.
Consider adding the release date for version 4.0.2 to help users track when changes were made.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.37.0)
29-29: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
CHANGELOG.MD(1 hunks)CHANGELOG_CN.MD(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Markdownlint (0.37.0)
CHANGELOG_CN.MD
13-13: null
Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
15-15: null
Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
17-17: null
Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
CHANGELOG.MD
29-29: null
Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
* feat:add some test ---------
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
slaveof no onecommand.log-net-activities, for dynamic logging control.repl_connect_statusmetric for enhanced monitoring of replication status.keyspace_hitsandkeyspace_missesinpika_exporter.Improvements
max-subcompactionsandlog-retention-timeparameters for better performance.Bug Fixes
rpoplpushcommand and improved compatibility between Pika-Exporter versions.