Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove unnecessary _obs_queue property #159

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 7, 2023
Merged

Conversation

albi3ro
Copy link
Contributor

@albi3ro albi3ro commented Nov 7, 2023

Tests in test_sample.py are setting an _obs_queue property and setting the return type of the observable.

This private property might be a legacy holdover from several years ago. It does nothing at this current point in time.

So I'm simply removing them from the tests.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 7, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (2ab43d1) 99.43% compared to head (5675494) 99.43%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #159   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.43%   99.43%           
=======================================
  Files           8        8           
  Lines         352      352           
=======================================
  Hits          350      350           
  Misses          2        2           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@timmysilv timmysilv left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

add to changelog and lgtm!

@albi3ro albi3ro merged commit e7f003f into master Nov 7, 2023
9 checks passed
@albi3ro albi3ro deleted the remove-unnecessary-obs-queue branch November 7, 2023 19:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants