Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updated announcement bar, updated meta descriptions, supernav #259

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

nastena1606
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@nastena1606 nastena1606 added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation do not merge labels Aug 12, 2024
@nastena1606 nastena1606 marked this pull request as ready for review August 14, 2024 10:28
Copy link

Performance test results:
Normal queries: 8624
TDE queries: 8920
Percentage: 103%

<strong>not recommended for production environments</strong> yet. We encourage you to test it and give your feedback.
This will help us improve the product and make it production-ready faster.
<br>
We are working at providing the index encryption and WAL encryption for indexes. This functionality will be available in Percona Server for PostgreSQL 17.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure if I would add "this will be available in 17", as that'll be part of tde_heap (full), which we want to release later separately.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we reword it as "Will be available as part of the tde_heap_full access method that is planned to be released as the tech preview in Percona Server for PostgreSQL 17"?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, that's clearer. (It's tde_heap, not tde_heap_full)

Copy link

@janwieremjewicz janwieremjewicz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@nastena1606 please discuss with @dutow the https://perconadev.atlassian.net/browse/PG-1017 impact on this statement. I think it asks for a bit more explanation and what is available with pg_tde and what when this story is implemented and a way to enable experimental options is provided.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
do not merge documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants