Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Have TimeZoneUsage check also flag illegal method references #1507

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 11, 2025

Conversation

Stephan202
Copy link
Member

@Stephan202 Stephan202 commented Jan 11, 2025

Suggested commit message:

Have `TimeZoneUsage` check also flag illegal method references (#1507)

While there, reorder a few things.

@Stephan202 Stephan202 added this to the 0.20.0 milestone Jan 11, 2025
Copy link

Looks good. All 2 mutations in this change were killed.

class surviving killed
🎉tech.picnic.errorprone.bugpatterns.TimeZoneUsage 0 2

Mutation testing report by Pitest. Review any surviving mutants by inspecting the line comments under Files changed.

Copy link
Contributor

@mohamedsamehsalah mohamedsamehsalah left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Funny timing, I was just watching a clip on theory of relativity 🕐 😄

Copy link
Member

@rickie rickie left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚀

@rickie rickie force-pushed the sschroevers/improve-TimeZoneUsage branch from 27df105 to 119fc04 Compare January 11, 2025 13:42
Copy link

Looks good. All 2 mutations in this change were killed.

class surviving killed
🎉tech.picnic.errorprone.bugpatterns.TimeZoneUsage 0 2

Mutation testing report by Pitest. Review any surviving mutants by inspecting the line comments under Files changed.

@rickie rickie merged commit 3e4a01a into master Jan 11, 2025
16 checks passed
@rickie rickie deleted the sschroevers/improve-TimeZoneUsage branch January 11, 2025 13:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants