Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Direct Deposit/Withdrawal #959

Merged
merged 22 commits into from
May 20, 2024
Merged

Conversation

Gauthamastro
Copy link
Member

Describe your changes

  1. Registers main account and deposits the assets on detection of direct deposit XCM type
  2. Modified Ob Withdrawal to use Multilocation for direct withdrawal from OB.

Issue ticket number and link

#956

Checklist before requesting a review

  • I have performed a self-review of my code.
  • If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.
  • I removed all Clippy and Formatting Warnings.
  • I added required Copyrights.

@Gauthamastro Gauthamastro requested a review from nuel77 May 13, 2024 10:34
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 13, 2024

Important

Auto Review Skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@Gauthamastro Gauthamastro self-assigned this May 13, 2024
@Gauthamastro Gauthamastro linked an issue May 13, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
@Gauthamastro Gauthamastro changed the base branch from mainnet-release to Develop May 13, 2024 12:40
pallets/thea-executor/src/lib.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
primitives/polkadex/src/withdrawal.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
primitives/polkadex/src/withdrawal.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pallets/thea-executor/src/lib.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
pallets/thea-executor/src/lib.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
@nuel77
Copy link
Member

nuel77 commented May 13, 2024

Id of direct deposts coming via thea should be given to engine via ingress messages? is this done?

@Gauthamastro Gauthamastro added the A0-PleaseReview Pull request needs code review. label May 13, 2024
@Gauthamastro
Copy link
Member Author

Id of direct deposts coming via thea should be given to engine via ingress messages? is this done?

Yes, you can check my latest commit, I am using the H160 type as identifier for both deposit and withdrawal

@Gauthamastro Gauthamastro requested review from nuel77 and zktony May 14, 2024 12:00
@Gauthamastro Gauthamastro added A0-PleaseReview Pull request needs code review. and removed A0-PleaseReview Pull request needs code review. labels May 14, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@serhii-temchenko serhii-temchenko left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should weights be re-generated for these pallets?

Also, please fix the errors caught by the CI.

runtimes/parachain/src/xcm_config.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
@Gauthamastro Gauthamastro added A0-PleaseReview Pull request needs code review. and removed A0-PleaseReview Pull request needs code review. labels May 15, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 15, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 38.54749% with 110 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 41.71%. Comparing base (8f669e1) to head (e6398c0).
Report is 4 commits behind head on Develop.

Files Patch % Lines
pallets/xcm-helper/src/lib.rs 3.44% 28 Missing ⚠️
pallets/thea-executor/src/lib.rs 57.62% 25 Missing ⚠️
pallets/ocex/src/lib.rs 47.72% 23 Missing ⚠️
primitives/thea/src/extras.rs 0.00% 11 Missing ⚠️
pallets/ocex/src/rpc.rs 0.00% 6 Missing ⚠️
pallets/thea-message-handler/src/benchmarking.rs 0.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
pallets/thea/src/benchmarking.rs 0.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
pallets/ocex/src/benchmarking.rs 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
pallets/thea-executor/src/benchmarking.rs 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
primitives/orderbook/src/traits.rs 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
... and 3 more
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           Develop     #959      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    41.72%   41.71%   -0.01%     
===========================================
  Files           70       72       +2     
  Lines         5773     5815      +42     
===========================================
+ Hits          2409     2426      +17     
- Misses        3364     3389      +25     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@serhii-temchenko serhii-temchenko left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should weights be re-generated for these pallets?

@Gauthamastro
Copy link
Member Author

Gauthamastro commented May 16, 2024

Should weights be re-generated for these pallets?

No we don't need that.

@Gauthamastro Gauthamastro added A0-PleaseReview Pull request needs code review. and removed A0-PleaseReview Pull request needs code review. labels May 16, 2024
nuel77
nuel77 previously approved these changes May 16, 2024
@serhii-temchenko
Copy link
Contributor

Please check CI. It's failing again.

@Gauthamastro Gauthamastro added A0-PleaseReview Pull request needs code review. and removed A0-PleaseReview Pull request needs code review. labels May 17, 2024
@Gauthamastro Gauthamastro merged commit 6046b3a into Develop May 20, 2024
3 checks passed
@Gauthamastro Gauthamastro deleted the gj/direct-withdrawal-deposit branch May 20, 2024 09:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A0-PleaseReview Pull request needs code review.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

P2.2: Direct Withdrawal of Native Tokens
4 participants