docs

Quafadas · Sep 27, 2024 · 333549a · 333549a
1 parent dd59781
commit 333549a
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 4 changed files with 20 additions and 2 deletions.
diff --git a/site/docs/_assets/plots/addScalar.vg.json b/site/docs/_assets/plots/addScalar.vg.json
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
     {
       "layer": [
         {
+          "title": "n = 3",
           "mark": "errorbar",
           "encoding": {
             "x": {
@@ -76,6 +77,7 @@
     {
       "layer": [
         {
+          "title": "n = 1000",
           "mark": "errorbar",
           "encoding": {
             "x": {
@@ -109,6 +111,7 @@
     {
       "layer": [
         {
+          "title": "n = 100000",
           "mark": "errorbar",
           "encoding": {
             "x": {

diff --git a/.../docs/_assets/plots/sum_over_time.vg.json → ..._assets/plots/addScalar_over_time.vg.json b/.../docs/_assets/plots/sum_over_time.vg.json → ..._assets/plots/addScalar_over_time.vg.json
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 {
   "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v5.json",
+
   "data": {
     "url": "../../benchmarks/benchmark_history.json",
     "format": {
@@ -30,7 +31,7 @@
     {
       "layer": [
         {
-          "title": "n = 10",
+          "title": "n = 3",
           "mark": {
             "type": "line",
             "color": "black"

diff --git a/site/docs/_assets/plots/sum.vg.json b/site/docs/_assets/plots/sum.vg.json
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
     {
       "layer": [
         {
+          "title": "n = 3",
           "mark": "errorbar",
           "encoding": {
             "x": {

diff --git a/site/docs/_docs/benchmarks/addScalar.md b/site/docs/_docs/benchmarks/addScalar.md
@@ -5,6 +5,10 @@ https://github.com/scala/scala3/issues/21637
 Here is the comparison of the standard `while` loop with the vectorised version.
 <div id="vis" style="width: 50vw;height: 10vh"></div>
 
+And a comparison over time.
+
+<div id="visTime" style="width: 50vw;height: 10vh"></div>
+
 <script type="module">
   import vegaEmbed from "https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/vega-embed@6/+esm?bundle-deps=true";
   var spec = "../../plots/addScalar.vg.json";
@@ -13,8 +17,17 @@ Here is the comparison of the standard `while` loop with the vectorised version.
   }).catch(console.error);
 </script>
 
+And over time
+
+<script type="module">
+  import vegaEmbed from "https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/vega-embed@6/+esm";
+  var spec = "../../plots/addScalar_over_time.vg.json";
+  vegaEmbed('#visTime', spec)
+</script>
+
+
 # Conclusion
 
 To my surprise, the vectorised version is slower than the standard `while` loop, in nearly each case and across the two environments I have to test in.
 
-It could be, that the JDK is simply very good at optimising this case. Feedback welcomed - but as the standard while loop outperforms the vectorised version, the standard while loop is left included.
+It could be, that the JDK is simply very good at optimising this case. Feedback welcomed - but as the standard while loop outperforms the vectorised version, the standard `while loop` version is left included.