Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Update 2023sep22workshop.md
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Few notes, and some changes that I needed to make to the slides from the Kjetil presentation.
- Changed utility back to original.
- Fixed description of MN graph.
- Added some charts of covid incidence in presenter notes, mostly as a formatting test. (Should probably just make them a link instead.)
- Tried to make the earnings for P a bit clearer.
  • Loading branch information
RMWinslow committed Sep 22, 2023
1 parent 0184ac7 commit 4ed38c6
Showing 1 changed file with 27 additions and 13 deletions.
40 changes: 27 additions & 13 deletions pui/2023sep22workshop.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -13,6 +13,18 @@ Robert Winslow
What is the effect of partial unemployment insurance on labor decisions?


---

QUESTION



---

<!--Maybe don't cite that paper about job search rates for now.-->




---

Expand All @@ -29,9 +41,8 @@ I want to put details about canadian EI in the notes here.






![BBC US Covid Chart](https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/B6A3/production/_115055764_optimised-us_cases_deaths24oct-nc.png.webp)
![BBC CAN Covid Chart](https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/25B3/production/_114915690_canada_cases_deaths-nc.png.webp)


---
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -79,7 +90,7 @@ $$
where WBA is weekly benefit amount (person-specific, fixed for entire duration of benefits spell)
and the earnings refers to the current week's labor income before taxes and transfers.

*Figure on right: earnings and benefits for a hypothetical Minnesota worker with a WBA of 400 USD*
*Figure on right: earnings and benefits for a hypothetical Minnesota worker with a WBA of 477 USD*

---

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -154,8 +165,10 @@ $$

The consumer's optimand is straightforward:

$$\mathbb{E} \sum_j \beta^t U(c_t,l_t) =
\mathbb{E} \sum_t \beta^t \Big(\frac{c_t^{1-\gamma_c}}{1-\gamma_c} + \psi \cdot \frac{l_t^{1-\gamma_l}}{1-\gamma_l}\Big)$$
<!--$$\mathbb{E} \sum_j \beta^t U(c_t,l_t) = \mathbb{E} \sum_t \beta^t \Big(\frac{c_t^{1-\gamma_c}}{1-\gamma_c} + \psi \cdot \frac{l_t^{1-\gamma_l}}{1-\gamma_l}\Big)$$-->

$$\mathbb{E} \sum_j \beta^t U(c_t,l_t) = \mathbb{E} \sum_t \beta^t \frac{(c_t^{1-\sigma}l_t^\sigma)^{1-\rho}-1}{1-\rho}$$


Two decisions the consumer faces:

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -229,13 +242,15 @@ $$
y_d(\eta,\mu) =
\begin{cases}
(1-\tau)y &\text{if } (\eta,\mu)=(\etaE,0) \\
(1-\tau)yθ_p &\text{if } (\eta,\mu)=(\etaP,1) \\
(1-\tau)yθ_u &\text{if } (\eta,\mu)=(\etaU,1) \\
(1-\tau)y\frac{\hP}{\hE} &\text{if } (\eta,\mu)=(\etaP,0) \\
0 &\text{if } (\eta,\mu)=(\etaU,0) \\
(1-\tau)yθ_p &\text{if } (\eta,\mu)=(\etaP,1) \\
(1-\tau)yθ_u &\text{if } (\eta,\mu)=(\etaU,1) \\
\end{cases}
$$

(Note that $yθ_p = y\frac{\hP}{\hE} + benefits$.)

and

$$
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -427,14 +442,13 @@ Which has stationary distribution $[0.89, 0.05, 0.06]$.
These use the same values as (Hansen, Imrohoroğlu, 1992) and :

- $\beta=0.995$ (time discount factor). Same as (Şahin et al, 2002)
- $\psi=0.35$
- $\gamma_c=0.5$
- $\gamma_l=2$
- $\sigma=0.5$
- $\rho=2.5$



$$\mathbb{E} \sum_j \beta^t U(c_t,l_t) = \mathbb{E} \sum_t \beta^t \frac{(c_t^{1-\sigma}l_t^\sigma)^{1-\rho}-1}{1-\rho}$$

$$\mathbb{E} \sum_j \beta^t U(c_t,l_t) =
\mathbb{E} \sum_t \beta^t \Big(\frac{c_t^{1-\gamma_c}}{1-\gamma_c} + \psi \cdot \frac{l_t^{1-\gamma_l}}{1-\gamma_l}\Big)$$



Expand Down

0 comments on commit 4ed38c6

Please sign in to comment.