Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ros topics not active while running simulation #16

Open
Nagelsaker opened this issue Feb 16, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Ros topics not active while running simulation #16

Nagelsaker opened this issue Feb 16, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@Nagelsaker
Copy link

Nagelsaker commented Feb 16, 2022

Hello, I am following this tutorial for setting up Gazebo with the OpenManipulator-X. The goal is to get some software originally designed and tested for the OpenManipulator-X and Ros Kinetic to work on Noetic as well, but I get some strange running it on Noetic. I get error messages already when launching open_manipulator_gazebo through "roslaunch open_manipulator_gazebo open_manipulator_gazebo.launch". The errors on the form "No p gain specified for pid. Namespace: /gazebo_ros_control/pid_gains/joint1" are appended in the logs.

Further, the tutorial says that the following ros topics should be active just by running the simulation:

image

While these are the topics active on my computer while running the sim:

rostopic_list

These are the active topics if I am running "roslaunch open_manipulator_controller open_manipulator_controller.launch use_platform:=false" as well:

image

Logs:
controller_spawner-6.log
joint_state_controller_spawner-5.log
master.log
roslaunch-tyr-37970.log
rosout.log
rosout-1-stdout.log
urdf_spawner-4.log

First time posting on here, so let me know if there's anything else I should include,
Regards,
Simon

@ROBOTIS-Will
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @Nagelsaker

You can ignore the error message regarding the pid gain as described in this ROS Answer thread.

I do get the same topic lists on my local machine. The eManual has not fully been updated with the Noetic screenshots and terminal outputs.
We'll review and update these discrepancies.

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants