Construal Level International Multilab Replication (CLIMR) Project: Reliability analysis for the Behavior Identification Form (BIF)
CLIMR Team 2024-11-28
bif_alpha_temporal
## Omega
## Call: omegah(m = m, nfactors = nfactors, fm = fm, key = key, flip = flip,
## digits = digits, title = title, sl = sl, labels = labels,
## plot = plot, n.obs = n.obs, rotate = rotate, Phi = Phi, option = option,
## covar = covar)
## Alpha: 0.76
## G.6: 0.76
## Omega Hierarchical: 0.63
## Omega H asymptotic: 0.8
## Omega Total 0.78
##
## Schmid Leiman Factor loadings greater than 0.2
## g F1* F2* F3* h2 u2 p2
## bif_01 0.31 0.11 0.89 0.90
## bif_02 0.45 0.25 0.75 0.82
## bif_04 0.32 0.33 0.22 0.78 0.48
## bif_07 0.43 0.24 0.76 0.78
## bif_08 0.29 0.30 0.19 0.81 0.45
## bif_09 0.51 0.29 0.71 0.90
## bif_10 0.37 0.21 0.19 0.81 0.73
## bif_11 0.26 0.27 0.15 0.85 0.42
## bif_12 0.51 0.30 0.70 0.87
## bif_15 0.34 0.30 0.22 0.78 0.54
## bif_16 0.58 0.38 0.62 0.87
## bif_17 0.32 0.30 0.20 0.80 0.52
## bif_18 0.28 0.36 0.21 0.79 0.38
## bif_19 0.38 0.17 0.83 0.11
## bif_20 0.41 0.20 0.80 0.83
## bif_22 0.20 0.06 0.94 0.01
## bif_23 0.32 0.24 0.19 0.81 0.53
## bif_24 0.21 0.09 0.91 0.46
## bif_25 0.47 0.25 0.75 0.87
##
## With Sums of squares of:
## g F1* F2* F3*
## 2.59 0.20 0.41 0.73
##
## general/max 3.57 max/min = 3.71
## mean percent general = 0.6 with sd = 0.27 and cv of 0.44
## Explained Common Variance of the general factor = 0.66
##
## The degrees of freedom are 117 and the fit is 0.12
## The number of observations was 2939 with Chi Square = 354.01 with prob < 1.2e-25
## The root mean square of the residuals is 0.02
## The df corrected root mean square of the residuals is 0.03
## RMSEA index = 0.026 and the 10 % confidence intervals are 0.023 0.029
## BIC = -580.34
##
## Compare this with the adequacy of just a general factor and no group factors
## The degrees of freedom for just the general factor are 152 and the fit is 0.34
## The number of observations was 2939 with Chi Square = 993.5 with prob < 1.4e-123
## The root mean square of the residuals is 0.05
## The df corrected root mean square of the residuals is 0.05
##
## RMSEA index = 0.043 and the 10 % confidence intervals are 0.041 0.046
## BIC = -220.35
##
## Measures of factor score adequacy
## g F1* F2* F3*
## Correlation of scores with factors 0.84 0.28 0.55 0.64
## Multiple R square of scores with factors 0.70 0.08 0.30 0.41
## Minimum correlation of factor score estimates 0.40 -0.84 -0.39 -0.17
##
## Total, General and Subset omega for each subset
## g F1* F2* F3*
## Omega total for total scores and subscales 0.78 0.71 0.40 0.56
## Omega general for total scores and subscales 0.63 0.65 0.24 0.23
## Omega group for total scores and subscales 0.10 0.07 0.17 0.33
bif_alpha_temporal
## Omega
## Call: omegah(m = m, nfactors = nfactors, fm = fm, key = key, flip = flip,
## digits = digits, title = title, sl = sl, labels = labels,
## plot = plot, n.obs = n.obs, rotate = rotate, Phi = Phi, option = option,
## covar = covar)
## Alpha: 0.76
## G.6: 0.76
## Omega Hierarchical: 0.63
## Omega H asymptotic: 0.8
## Omega Total 0.78
##
## Schmid Leiman Factor loadings greater than 0.2
## g F1* F2* F3* h2 u2 p2
## bif_01 0.31 0.11 0.89 0.90
## bif_02 0.45 0.25 0.75 0.82
## bif_04 0.32 0.33 0.22 0.78 0.48
## bif_07 0.43 0.24 0.76 0.78
## bif_08 0.29 0.30 0.19 0.81 0.45
## bif_09 0.51 0.29 0.71 0.90
## bif_10 0.37 0.21 0.19 0.81 0.73
## bif_11 0.26 0.27 0.15 0.85 0.42
## bif_12 0.51 0.30 0.70 0.87
## bif_15 0.34 0.30 0.22 0.78 0.54
## bif_16 0.58 0.38 0.62 0.87
## bif_17 0.32 0.30 0.20 0.80 0.52
## bif_18 0.28 0.36 0.21 0.79 0.38
## bif_19 0.38 0.17 0.83 0.11
## bif_20 0.41 0.20 0.80 0.83
## bif_22 0.20 0.06 0.94 0.01
## bif_23 0.32 0.24 0.19 0.81 0.53
## bif_24 0.21 0.09 0.91 0.46
## bif_25 0.47 0.25 0.75 0.87
##
## With Sums of squares of:
## g F1* F2* F3*
## 2.59 0.20 0.41 0.73
##
## general/max 3.57 max/min = 3.71
## mean percent general = 0.6 with sd = 0.27 and cv of 0.44
## Explained Common Variance of the general factor = 0.66
##
## The degrees of freedom are 117 and the fit is 0.12
## The number of observations was 2939 with Chi Square = 354.01 with prob < 1.2e-25
## The root mean square of the residuals is 0.02
## The df corrected root mean square of the residuals is 0.03
## RMSEA index = 0.026 and the 10 % confidence intervals are 0.023 0.029
## BIC = -580.34
##
## Compare this with the adequacy of just a general factor and no group factors
## The degrees of freedom for just the general factor are 152 and the fit is 0.34
## The number of observations was 2939 with Chi Square = 993.5 with prob < 1.4e-123
## The root mean square of the residuals is 0.05
## The df corrected root mean square of the residuals is 0.05
##
## RMSEA index = 0.043 and the 10 % confidence intervals are 0.041 0.046
## BIC = -220.35
##
## Measures of factor score adequacy
## g F1* F2* F3*
## Correlation of scores with factors 0.84 0.28 0.55 0.64
## Multiple R square of scores with factors 0.70 0.08 0.30 0.41
## Minimum correlation of factor score estimates 0.40 -0.84 -0.39 -0.17
##
## Total, General and Subset omega for each subset
## g F1* F2* F3*
## Omega total for total scores and subscales 0.78 0.71 0.40 0.56
## Omega general for total scores and subscales 0.63 0.65 0.24 0.23
## Omega group for total scores and subscales 0.10 0.07 0.17 0.33
bif_alpha_spatial
## Omega
## Call: omegah(m = m, nfactors = nfactors, fm = fm, key = key, flip = flip,
## digits = digits, title = title, sl = sl, labels = labels,
## plot = plot, n.obs = n.obs, rotate = rotate, Phi = Phi, option = option,
## covar = covar)
## Alpha: 0.67
## G.6: 0.67
## Omega Hierarchical: 0.64
## Omega H asymptotic: 0.92
## Omega Total 0.7
##
## Schmid Leiman Factor loadings greater than 0.2
## g F1* F2* F3* h2 u2 p2
## bif_02 0.29 0.10 0.90 0.89
## bif_04 0.31 0.11 0.89 0.88
## bif_05 0.43 0.21 0.79 0.90
## bif_07 0.33 0.12 0.88 0.95
## bif_09 0.47 0.23 0.77 0.95
## bif_10 0.39 0.16 0.84 0.97
## bif_12 0.50 0.26 0.74 0.98
## bif_14 0.40 0.71 0.66 0.34 0.24
## bif_16 0.58 0.33 0.67 1.00
## bif_19 0.45 0.22 0.78 0.08
## bif_20 0.36 0.16 0.84 0.83
## bif_22 0.06 0.94 0.42
## bif_23 0.34 0.14 0.86 0.79
##
## With Sums of squares of:
## g F1* F2* F3*
## 1.89 0.00 0.55 0.31
##
## general/max 3.44 max/min = 195.46
## mean percent general = 0.76 with sd = 0.31 and cv of 0.4
## Explained Common Variance of the general factor = 0.69
##
## The degrees of freedom are 42 and the fit is 0.05
## The number of observations was 2972 with Chi Square = 149.51 with prob < 5.7e-14
## The root mean square of the residuals is 0.02
## The df corrected root mean square of the residuals is 0.03
## RMSEA index = 0.029 and the 10 % confidence intervals are 0.024 0.035
## BIC = -186.36
##
## Compare this with the adequacy of just a general factor and no group factors
## The degrees of freedom for just the general factor are 65 and the fit is 0.11
## The number of observations was 2972 with Chi Square = 321.25 with prob < 1.4e-35
## The root mean square of the residuals is 0.03
## The df corrected root mean square of the residuals is 0.04
##
## RMSEA index = 0.036 and the 10 % confidence intervals are 0.033 0.04
## BIC = -198.55
##
## Measures of factor score adequacy
## g F1* F2* F3*
## Correlation of scores with factors 0.83 0.04 0.75 0.52
## Multiple R square of scores with factors 0.69 0.00 0.56 0.27
## Minimum correlation of factor score estimates 0.39 -1.00 0.12 -0.46
##
## Total, General and Subset omega for each subset
## g F1* F2* F3*
## Omega total for total scores and subscales 0.70 0.33 0.59 0.42
## Omega general for total scores and subscales 0.64 0.33 0.54 0.31
## Omega group for total scores and subscales 0.05 0.00 0.06 0.11
bif_alpha_spatial
## Omega
## Call: omegah(m = m, nfactors = nfactors, fm = fm, key = key, flip = flip,
## digits = digits, title = title, sl = sl, labels = labels,
## plot = plot, n.obs = n.obs, rotate = rotate, Phi = Phi, option = option,
## covar = covar)
## Alpha: 0.67
## G.6: 0.67
## Omega Hierarchical: 0.64
## Omega H asymptotic: 0.92
## Omega Total 0.7
##
## Schmid Leiman Factor loadings greater than 0.2
## g F1* F2* F3* h2 u2 p2
## bif_02 0.29 0.10 0.90 0.89
## bif_04 0.31 0.11 0.89 0.88
## bif_05 0.43 0.21 0.79 0.90
## bif_07 0.33 0.12 0.88 0.95
## bif_09 0.47 0.23 0.77 0.95
## bif_10 0.39 0.16 0.84 0.97
## bif_12 0.50 0.26 0.74 0.98
## bif_14 0.40 0.71 0.66 0.34 0.24
## bif_16 0.58 0.33 0.67 1.00
## bif_19 0.45 0.22 0.78 0.08
## bif_20 0.36 0.16 0.84 0.83
## bif_22 0.06 0.94 0.42
## bif_23 0.34 0.14 0.86 0.79
##
## With Sums of squares of:
## g F1* F2* F3*
## 1.89 0.00 0.55 0.31
##
## general/max 3.44 max/min = 195.46
## mean percent general = 0.76 with sd = 0.31 and cv of 0.4
## Explained Common Variance of the general factor = 0.69
##
## The degrees of freedom are 42 and the fit is 0.05
## The number of observations was 2972 with Chi Square = 149.51 with prob < 5.7e-14
## The root mean square of the residuals is 0.02
## The df corrected root mean square of the residuals is 0.03
## RMSEA index = 0.029 and the 10 % confidence intervals are 0.024 0.035
## BIC = -186.36
##
## Compare this with the adequacy of just a general factor and no group factors
## The degrees of freedom for just the general factor are 65 and the fit is 0.11
## The number of observations was 2972 with Chi Square = 321.25 with prob < 1.4e-35
## The root mean square of the residuals is 0.03
## The df corrected root mean square of the residuals is 0.04
##
## RMSEA index = 0.036 and the 10 % confidence intervals are 0.033 0.04
## BIC = -198.55
##
## Measures of factor score adequacy
## g F1* F2* F3*
## Correlation of scores with factors 0.83 0.04 0.75 0.52
## Multiple R square of scores with factors 0.69 0.00 0.56 0.27
## Minimum correlation of factor score estimates 0.39 -1.00 0.12 -0.46
##
## Total, General and Subset omega for each subset
## g F1* F2* F3*
## Omega total for total scores and subscales 0.70 0.33 0.59 0.42
## Omega general for total scores and subscales 0.64 0.33 0.54 0.31
## Omega group for total scores and subscales 0.05 0.00 0.06 0.11
bif_alpha_social
## Omega
## Call: omegah(m = m, nfactors = nfactors, fm = fm, key = key, flip = flip,
## digits = digits, title = title, sl = sl, labels = labels,
## plot = plot, n.obs = n.obs, rotate = rotate, Phi = Phi, option = option,
## covar = covar)
## Alpha: 0.82
## G.6: 0.82
## Omega Hierarchical: 0.62
## Omega H asymptotic: 0.75
## Omega Total 0.83
##
## Schmid Leiman Factor loadings greater than 0.2
## g F1* F2* F3* h2 u2 p2
## bif_01 0.27 0.10 0.90 0.74
## bif_02 0.36 0.21 0.20 0.80 0.66
## bif_03 0.03 0.97 0.28
## bif_04 0.28 0.43 0.26 0.74 0.29
## bif_05 0.30 0.16 0.84 0.58
## bif_06 0.34 0.21 0.17 0.83 0.67
## bif_07 0.40 0.28 0.26 0.74 0.63
## bif_08 0.29 0.32 0.19 0.81 0.43
## bif_09 0.48 0.29 0.31 0.69 0.73
## bif_10 0.37 0.21 0.18 0.82 0.73
## bif_11 0.31 0.25 0.18 0.82 0.54
## bif_12 0.47 0.26 0.30 0.70 0.75
## bif_13 0.42 0.24 0.76 0.74
## bif_14 0.38 0.20 0.80 0.73
## bif_15 0.39 0.24 0.23 0.77 0.66
## bif_16 0.54 0.25 0.37 0.63 0.78
## bif_17 0.38 0.30 0.24 0.76 0.58
## bif_18 0.34 0.35 0.24 0.76 0.47
## bif_19 0.25 0.39 0.21 0.79 0.28
## bif_20 0.47 0.24 0.31 0.69 0.71
## bif_21 0.30 0.21 0.15 0.85 0.61
## bif_22 0.28 0.09 0.91 0.05
## bif_23 0.35 0.26 0.22 0.78 0.55
## bif_24 0.26 0.25 0.13 0.87 0.51
## bif_25 0.42 0.30 0.28 0.72 0.63
##
## With Sums of squares of:
## g F1* F2* F3*
## 3.17 0.69 0.81 0.56
##
## general/max 3.9 max/min = 1.45
## mean percent general = 0.57 with sd = 0.18 and cv of 0.32
## Explained Common Variance of the general factor = 0.61
##
## The degrees of freedom are 228 and the fit is 0.27
## The number of observations was 2923 with Chi Square = 788.31 with prob < 8.5e-63
## The root mean square of the residuals is 0.02
## The df corrected root mean square of the residuals is 0.03
## RMSEA index = 0.029 and the 10 % confidence intervals are 0.027 0.031
## BIC = -1031.21
##
## Compare this with the adequacy of just a general factor and no group factors
## The degrees of freedom for just the general factor are 275 and the fit is 0.61
## The number of observations was 2923 with Chi Square = 1783.6 with prob < 7e-219
## The root mean square of the residuals is 0.05
## The df corrected root mean square of the residuals is 0.06
##
## RMSEA index = 0.043 and the 10 % confidence intervals are 0.041 0.045
## BIC = -411
##
## Measures of factor score adequacy
## g F1* F2* F3*
## Correlation of scores with factors 0.81 0.49 0.65 0.60
## Multiple R square of scores with factors 0.65 0.24 0.42 0.36
## Minimum correlation of factor score estimates 0.31 -0.52 -0.16 -0.29
##
## Total, General and Subset omega for each subset
## g F1* F2* F3*
## Omega total for total scores and subscales 0.83 0.75 0.60 0.53
## Omega general for total scores and subscales 0.62 0.56 0.33 0.30
## Omega group for total scores and subscales 0.12 0.19 0.27 0.23
bif_alpha_social
## Omega
## Call: omegah(m = m, nfactors = nfactors, fm = fm, key = key, flip = flip,
## digits = digits, title = title, sl = sl, labels = labels,
## plot = plot, n.obs = n.obs, rotate = rotate, Phi = Phi, option = option,
## covar = covar)
## Alpha: 0.82
## G.6: 0.82
## Omega Hierarchical: 0.62
## Omega H asymptotic: 0.75
## Omega Total 0.83
##
## Schmid Leiman Factor loadings greater than 0.2
## g F1* F2* F3* h2 u2 p2
## bif_01 0.27 0.10 0.90 0.74
## bif_02 0.36 0.21 0.20 0.80 0.66
## bif_03 0.03 0.97 0.28
## bif_04 0.28 0.43 0.26 0.74 0.29
## bif_05 0.30 0.16 0.84 0.58
## bif_06 0.34 0.21 0.17 0.83 0.67
## bif_07 0.40 0.28 0.26 0.74 0.63
## bif_08 0.29 0.32 0.19 0.81 0.43
## bif_09 0.48 0.29 0.31 0.69 0.73
## bif_10 0.37 0.21 0.18 0.82 0.73
## bif_11 0.31 0.25 0.18 0.82 0.54
## bif_12 0.47 0.26 0.30 0.70 0.75
## bif_13 0.42 0.24 0.76 0.74
## bif_14 0.38 0.20 0.80 0.73
## bif_15 0.39 0.24 0.23 0.77 0.66
## bif_16 0.54 0.25 0.37 0.63 0.78
## bif_17 0.38 0.30 0.24 0.76 0.58
## bif_18 0.34 0.35 0.24 0.76 0.47
## bif_19 0.25 0.39 0.21 0.79 0.28
## bif_20 0.47 0.24 0.31 0.69 0.71
## bif_21 0.30 0.21 0.15 0.85 0.61
## bif_22 0.28 0.09 0.91 0.05
## bif_23 0.35 0.26 0.22 0.78 0.55
## bif_24 0.26 0.25 0.13 0.87 0.51
## bif_25 0.42 0.30 0.28 0.72 0.63
##
## With Sums of squares of:
## g F1* F2* F3*
## 3.17 0.69 0.81 0.56
##
## general/max 3.9 max/min = 1.45
## mean percent general = 0.57 with sd = 0.18 and cv of 0.32
## Explained Common Variance of the general factor = 0.61
##
## The degrees of freedom are 228 and the fit is 0.27
## The number of observations was 2923 with Chi Square = 788.31 with prob < 8.5e-63
## The root mean square of the residuals is 0.02
## The df corrected root mean square of the residuals is 0.03
## RMSEA index = 0.029 and the 10 % confidence intervals are 0.027 0.031
## BIC = -1031.21
##
## Compare this with the adequacy of just a general factor and no group factors
## The degrees of freedom for just the general factor are 275 and the fit is 0.61
## The number of observations was 2923 with Chi Square = 1783.6 with prob < 7e-219
## The root mean square of the residuals is 0.05
## The df corrected root mean square of the residuals is 0.06
##
## RMSEA index = 0.043 and the 10 % confidence intervals are 0.041 0.045
## BIC = -411
##
## Measures of factor score adequacy
## g F1* F2* F3*
## Correlation of scores with factors 0.81 0.49 0.65 0.60
## Multiple R square of scores with factors 0.65 0.24 0.42 0.36
## Minimum correlation of factor score estimates 0.31 -0.52 -0.16 -0.29
##
## Total, General and Subset omega for each subset
## g F1* F2* F3*
## Omega total for total scores and subscales 0.83 0.75 0.60 0.53
## Omega general for total scores and subscales 0.62 0.56 0.33 0.30
## Omega group for total scores and subscales 0.12 0.19 0.27 0.23
bif_alpha_likelihood
## Omega
## Call: omegah(m = m, nfactors = nfactors, fm = fm, key = key, flip = flip,
## digits = digits, title = title, sl = sl, labels = labels,
## plot = plot, n.obs = n.obs, rotate = rotate, Phi = Phi, option = option,
## covar = covar)
## Alpha: 0.57
## G.6: 0.56
## Omega Hierarchical: 0.4
## Omega H asymptotic: 0.65
## Omega Total 0.62
##
## Schmid Leiman Factor loadings greater than 0.2
## g F1* F2* F3* h2 u2 p2
## bif_01 0.25 0.29 0.15 0.85 0.42
## bif_07 0.26 0.42 0.25 0.75 0.28
## bif_08 0.21 0.20 0.13 0.87 0.34
## bif_09 0.44 0.28 0.32 0.68 0.61
## bif_11 0.29 0.40 0.25 0.75 0.35
## bif_12 0.43 0.29 0.29 0.71 0.63
## bif_18 0.32 0.30 0.22 0.78 0.48
## bif_22 0.03 0.97 0.38
## bif_25 0.41 0.42 0.34 0.66 0.48
##
## With Sums of squares of:
## g F1* F2* F3*
## 0.92 0.41 0.35 0.30
##
## general/max 2.22 max/min = 1.39
## mean percent general = 0.44 with sd = 0.12 and cv of 0.27
## Explained Common Variance of the general factor = 0.46
##
## The degrees of freedom are 12 and the fit is 0.01
## The number of observations was 2935 with Chi Square = 32.58 with prob < 0.0011
## The root mean square of the residuals is 0.01
## The df corrected root mean square of the residuals is 0.02
## RMSEA index = 0.024 and the 10 % confidence intervals are 0.014 0.034
## BIC = -63.23
##
## Compare this with the adequacy of just a general factor and no group factors
## The degrees of freedom for just the general factor are 27 and the fit is 0.12
## The number of observations was 2935 with Chi Square = 337.85 with prob < 1.9e-55
## The root mean square of the residuals is 0.06
## The df corrected root mean square of the residuals is 0.07
##
## RMSEA index = 0.063 and the 10 % confidence intervals are 0.057 0.069
## BIC = 122.27
##
## Measures of factor score adequacy
## g F1* F2* F3*
## Correlation of scores with factors 0.66 0.53 0.52 0.48
## Multiple R square of scores with factors 0.44 0.28 0.27 0.23
## Minimum correlation of factor score estimates -0.12 -0.44 -0.45 -0.53
##
## Total, General and Subset omega for each subset
## g F1* F2* F3*
## Omega total for total scores and subscales 0.62 0.44 0.35 0.47
## Omega general for total scores and subscales 0.40 0.23 0.14 0.27
## Omega group for total scores and subscales 0.14 0.21 0.22 0.20
bif_alpha_likelihood
## Omega
## Call: omegah(m = m, nfactors = nfactors, fm = fm, key = key, flip = flip,
## digits = digits, title = title, sl = sl, labels = labels,
## plot = plot, n.obs = n.obs, rotate = rotate, Phi = Phi, option = option,
## covar = covar)
## Alpha: 0.57
## G.6: 0.56
## Omega Hierarchical: 0.4
## Omega H asymptotic: 0.65
## Omega Total 0.62
##
## Schmid Leiman Factor loadings greater than 0.2
## g F1* F2* F3* h2 u2 p2
## bif_01 0.25 0.29 0.15 0.85 0.42
## bif_07 0.26 0.42 0.25 0.75 0.28
## bif_08 0.21 0.20 0.13 0.87 0.34
## bif_09 0.44 0.28 0.32 0.68 0.61
## bif_11 0.29 0.40 0.25 0.75 0.35
## bif_12 0.43 0.29 0.29 0.71 0.63
## bif_18 0.32 0.30 0.22 0.78 0.48
## bif_22 0.03 0.97 0.38
## bif_25 0.41 0.42 0.34 0.66 0.48
##
## With Sums of squares of:
## g F1* F2* F3*
## 0.92 0.41 0.35 0.30
##
## general/max 2.22 max/min = 1.39
## mean percent general = 0.44 with sd = 0.12 and cv of 0.27
## Explained Common Variance of the general factor = 0.46
##
## The degrees of freedom are 12 and the fit is 0.01
## The number of observations was 2935 with Chi Square = 32.58 with prob < 0.0011
## The root mean square of the residuals is 0.01
## The df corrected root mean square of the residuals is 0.02
## RMSEA index = 0.024 and the 10 % confidence intervals are 0.014 0.034
## BIC = -63.23
##
## Compare this with the adequacy of just a general factor and no group factors
## The degrees of freedom for just the general factor are 27 and the fit is 0.12
## The number of observations was 2935 with Chi Square = 337.85 with prob < 1.9e-55
## The root mean square of the residuals is 0.06
## The df corrected root mean square of the residuals is 0.07
##
## RMSEA index = 0.063 and the 10 % confidence intervals are 0.057 0.069
## BIC = 122.27
##
## Measures of factor score adequacy
## g F1* F2* F3*
## Correlation of scores with factors 0.66 0.53 0.52 0.48
## Multiple R square of scores with factors 0.44 0.28 0.27 0.23
## Minimum correlation of factor score estimates -0.12 -0.44 -0.45 -0.53
##
## Total, General and Subset omega for each subset
## g F1* F2* F3*
## Omega total for total scores and subscales 0.62 0.44 0.35 0.47
## Omega general for total scores and subscales 0.40 0.23 0.14 0.27
## Omega group for total scores and subscales 0.14 0.21 0.22 0.20