Construal Level International Multi-lab Replication (CLIMR) Project

This project entails multi-lab collaborative replications of studies on Construal Level Theory (CLT):

Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 5-18. Study 1.

Fujita, K., Henderson, M., Eng, J., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2006). Spatial distance and mental construal of social events. Psychological Science, 14, 278-282. Study 1.

In addition to close replications of these two studies, this project also includes two paradigmatic replications relevant to social and likelihood distance.

The CLIMR project is a collaboration of 78 labs, across 27 countries, featuring 15 languages.

Compendium Structure

The CLIMR project compendium comprises two main parts, one hosted on the Open Science Framework (OSF; https://osf.io/ra3dp/) and one hosted on GitHub (https://github.com/RabbitSnore/CLIMR). The OSF repository for CLIMR contains the materials, methods, and data (when data are collected). The OSF repository also contains the registration documentation and Stage 1 manuscript for the registered report for the primary results of the project. The GitHub repository contains the code necessary to execute and reproduce the statistical analyses for the project.

This repository is structured as follows:

• The source file for compiling the project is located in the root directory.
• The source files to render analysis reports (i.e., .Rmd files) in the root directory.
• The source files for data wrangling, visualization, simulation, effect calculation, and analysis are located in the /R/ directory.
• Rendered figures are located in the /figures/ directory.
• Some data are located in the /data/ directory, and data required for analyses will be downloaded automatically from the Open Science Framework as required.
• Rendered reports are located in the /reports/ directory.

(Re-)Building the Project

If you want to reproduce the analyses and output for the CLIMR project, the most straightforward way to do this is to clone this repository into an RStudio project. This webpage has information about how to clone repositories in RStudio. Once you have cloned the repository, open the project in RStudio, and run the following code:

source("CLIMR_build-project.R")

Running this script will install all necessary packages and build the project, including all effect size calculations, meta-analytic models, data visualizations, and reports.

Additionally, CLIMR_build-project.R includes parameters that control its operations (e.g., whether to run a simulation or load data files). These parameters must be changed manually, and they should only be changed if you know what you are doing.

Additional supplemental materials are available on the Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/ra3dp/

Technical Information for Reproducibility

The CLIMR project analysis code was built using R 4.3.2. The packages required for the project are tracked with the renv package. Guidance on how to use the renv package can be found here

If you are reproducing the analyses for the first time, before running the script to build the project, you will need to install all necessary packages (in their correct version). The parameters of the build script are set to perform these installations by default. Note that this process can be time consuming and may require user input to confirm the installations. Alternatively, to do this manually, make sure that renv is installed, and run renv::restore().

Readable Reports

Reports of the the main analyses, supplemental analyses, and preliminary studies are available in the /reports/ directory. These reports are rendered in a format that is readable on GitHub.

Primary Results

The primary results of the replications are available in the reports linked below.

• Main Analyses
• Comprehension Check Analyses
• Manipulation Check Analyses
• Power Analyses
• BIF Response Option Valence Robustness Checks

Validation Studies

In part to assist with the selection of studies that would be theoretically informative to replicate, we have conducted a series of studies assessing measures of mental abstraction/concreteness. These validations studies are reported in a preprint available here: https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/v6xt4

• Validation Study 1: BIF, Categorization, Segmentation
• Validation Study 2: Interval Estimation
• Validation Study 3: Linguistic Measures

Pretests and Examination of Outcome Measures

To address reviewer concerns and to validate the procedures used in the replication studies, we have conducted a series of pretests and assessments of potential sources of error. These analyses are reported in the documents linked below.

• Differntial Effects on BIF Items
• Relevance of BIF Items to Target Event
• Valence of BIF Response Options
• Pretest of Social Distance Manipulation

Exploratory and Post Hoc Analyses

In addition to the planned analyses, we conducted several exploratory and post hoc analyses of the data.

• Spatial Experiment: Online Location Check Analysis
• Additional BIF Response Option Valence Difference Analyses: Random Slopes Models and Full Scales
• Scale Reliability of the BIF
• Cause Size and Effect Size Analysis
• Analysis of Influential Cases
• Analysis of Country and Language
• Analysis of Effects on Individual BIF Items
• Reanalysis of Data from Previous CLT Research
• Potential Moderating Effect of the Analysis-Holism Scale
• Potential Moderating Effect of Positive and Negative Affect
• Influence of Actual Distance on Effect of Spatial Distance
• Potential Differences of Effect of Temporal Distance Across (Actual) Time