-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fork5-rebasing #24
Fork5-rebasing #24
Conversation
npm run audit
This is their code and you're just merging it in, right? Should I review the specific changes? |
console.log(`npx hardhat verify --constructor-args upgrade/arguments.js ${newImplPolygonAddress} --network ${process.env.HARDHAT_NETWORK}\n`); | ||
console.log("Copy the following constructor arguments on: upgrade/arguments.js \n", upgrade.constructorArgs) | ||
console.log('Copy the following constructor arguments on: upgrade/arguments.js \n', upgrade.constructorArgs); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wouldn't this print a literal \n when we want a new line?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In my terminal, it prints a new line.
Yes, its a 1to1 merge from their code. The only major change is the difference in function signature of verifyBatches with the different proof handover. No, nothing specific to review, just whether it makes sense all together. |
It's a rebase to the newest fork.5 contracts of the polygon contracts. I will keep it open until the polygon team merges it to main