Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Physics informed neural operator ode #806

Open
wants to merge 144 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Physics informed neural operator ode #806

wants to merge 144 commits into from

Conversation

KirillZubov
Copy link
Member

@KirillZubov KirillZubov commented Feb 12, 2024

Implementation Physics-informed neural operator method for solve parametric Ordinary Differential Equations (ODE) use DeepOnet.

#575

Checklist

  • pino ode
  • family ode by parameter
  • physics informed DeepOnet
  • tests
  • addition loss test
  • doc
  • multiple parameters
  • test with vector outputs and multiple parameters
  • imigrate to LuxNeuralOperators
  • interpretation output with another mesh
  • vector output Vector output for PINO ODE #871
  • update docs

https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.10974
https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.03794

@KirillZubov
Copy link
Member Author

@ChrisRackauckas I need help with packages version. Adding dependency of NeuralOperator.jl to project, fail CI. I've tried a little to line up suitable versions but not success.

KirillZubov and others added 2 commits September 5, 2024 18:21
Co-authored-by: Sathvik Bhagavan <35105271+sathvikbhagavan@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sathvik Bhagavan <35105271+sathvikbhagavan@users.noreply.github.com>
@sathvikbhagavan
Copy link
Member

@KirillZubov, This looks good to go, but I do not want to merge until CI is ran successfully. So, have to wait a bit on that. Until then, I see Chris has pinged you to look into #883. Can you look into fixing that?

@KirillZubov
Copy link
Member Author

@KirillZubov, This looks good to go, but I do not want to merge until CI is ran successfully. So, have to wait a bit on that. Until then, I see Chris has pinged you to look into #883. Can you look into fixing that?

Hey @sathvikbhagavan yes, it is related to my task with output vector so yes I going to figure out to it on this week.
I agree there will be needed sure that all work fine before merge it. I will complete this task, waiting for the remaining parts to be ready in order to merge this PR.

@KirillZubov
Copy link
Member Author

Hi @sathvikbhagavan, @ChrisRackauckas I updated this PR for Lux v1.0 and some another update in order to PinoODE tests would passed for CI. The fact that other tests don't work due to the Lux update is beyond the scope of my summer project. This PR is ready for review.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants