Welcome to an open source implementation of OpenAI's CLIP (Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training).
The goal of this repository is to enable training models with contrastive image-text supervision, and to investigate their properties such as robustness to distribution shift. Our starting point is an implementation of CLIP that matches the accuracy of the original CLIP models when trained on the same dataset. Specifically, a ResNet-50 model trained with our codebase on OpenAI's 15 million image subset of YFCC achieves 32.7% top-1 accuracy on ImageNet. OpenAI's CLIP model reaches 31.3% when trained on the same subset of YFCC. For ease of experimentation, we also provide code for training on the 3 million images in the Conceptual Captions dataset, where a ResNet-50x4 trained with our codebase reaches 22.2% top-1 ImageNet accuracy.
As we describe in more detail below, CLIP models in a medium accuracy regime already allow us to draw conclusions about the robustness of larger CLIP models since the models follow reliable scaling laws.
This codebase is work in progress, and we invite all to contribute in making it more acessible and useful. In the future, we plan to add support for TPU training and release larger models. We hope this codebase facilitates and promotes further research in contrastive image-text learning. Please submit an issue or send an email if you have any other requests or suggestions.
Note that src/clip
is a copy of OpenAI's official repository with minimal changes.
OpenCLIP reads a CSV file with two columns: a path to an image, and a text caption. The names of the columns are passed as an argument to main.py
.
The script src/data/gather_cc.py
will collect the Conceptual Captions images. First, download the Conceptual Captions URLs and then run the script from our repository:
python3 src/data/gather_cc.py path/to/Train_GCC-training.tsv path/to/Validation_GCC-1.1.0-Validation.tsv
Our training set contains 2.89M images, and our validation set contains 13K images.
In addition to specifying the training data via CSV files as mentioned above, our codebase also supports webdataset, which is recommended for larger scale datasets. The expected format is a series of .tar
files. Each of these .tar
files should contain two files for each training example, one for the image and one for the corresponding text. Both files should have the same name but different extensions. For instance, shard_001.tar
could contain files such as abc.jpg
and abc.txt
. You can learn more about webdataset
at https://github.com/webdataset/webdataset. We use .tar
files with 1,000 data points each, which we create using tarp.
You can download the YFCC dataset from Multimedia Commons. Similar to OpenAI, we used a subset of YFCC to reach the aforementioned accuracy numbers. The indices of images in this subset are in OpenAI's CLIP repository.
conda env create
conda activate open_clip
cd open_clip
export PYTHONPATH="$PYTHONPATH:$PWD/src"
nohup python -u src/training/main.py \
--save-frequency 1 \
--zeroshot-frequency 1 \
--report-to tensorboard \
--train-data="/path/to/train_data.csv" \
--val-data="/path/to/validation_data.csv" \
--csv-img-key filepath \
--csv-caption-key title \
--imagenet-val=/path/to/imagenet/root/val/ \
--warmup 10000 \
--batch-size=128 \
--lr=1e-3 \
--wd=0.1 \
--epochs=30 \
--workers=8 \
--model RN50
Note: imagenet-val
is the path to the validation set of ImageNet for zero-shot evaluation, not the training set!
You can remove this argument if you do not want to perform zero-shot evaluation on ImageNet throughout training. Note that the val
folder should contain subfolders. If it doest not, please use this script.
When run on a machine with 8 GPUs the command should produce the following training curve for Conceptual Captions:
More detailed curves for Conceptual Captions are given at /docs/clip_conceptual_captions.md.
When training a RN50 on YFCC the same hyperparameters as above are used, with the exception of lr=5e-4
and epochs=32
.
Note that to use another model, like ViT-B/32
or RN50x4
or RN50x16
or ViT-B/16
, specify with --model RN50x4
.
tensorboard --logdir=logs/tensorboard/ --port=7777
python src/training/main.py \
--train-data="/path/to/train_data.csv" \
--val-data="/path/to/validation_data.csv" \
--resume /path/to/checkpoints/epoch_K.pt
python src/training/main.py \
--val-data="/path/to/validation_data.csv" \
--resume /path/to/checkpoints/epoch_K.pt
Below are checkpoints of models trained on YFCC-15M, along with their zero-shot top-1 accuracies on ImageNet and ImageNetV2. These models were trained using 8 GPUs and the same hyperparameters described in the "Sample running code" section, with the exception of lr=5e-4
and epochs=32
.
- ResNet-50 (32.7% / 27.9%)
- ResNet-101 (34.8% / 30.0%)
The plot below shows how zero-shot performance of CLIP models varies as we scale the number of samples used for training. Zero-shot performance increases steadily for both ImageNet and ImageNetV2, and is far from saturated at ~15M samples.
TL;DR: CLIP models have high effective robustness, even at small scales.
CLIP models are particularly intriguing because they are more robust to natural distribution shifts (see Section 3.3 in the CLIP paper). This phenomena is illustrated by the figure below, with ImageNet accuracy on the x-axis and ImageNetV2 (a reproduction of the ImageNet validation set with distribution shift) accuracy on the y-axis. Standard training denotes training on the ImageNet train set and the CLIP zero-shot models are shown as stars.
As observed by Taori et al., 2020 and Miller et al., 2021, the in-distribution and out-of-distribution accuracies of models trained on ImageNet follow a predictable linear trend (the red line in the above plot). Effective robustness quantifies robustness as accuracy beyond this baseline, i.e., how far a model lies above the red line. Ideally a model would not suffer from distribution shift and fall on the y = x line (trained human labelers are within a percentage point of the y = x line).
Even though the CLIP models trained with this codebase achieve much lower accuracy than those trained by OpenAI, our models still lie on the same trend of improved effective robustness (the purple line). Therefore, we can study what makes CLIP robust without requiring industrial-scale compute.
For more more information on effective robustness, please see:
We are a group of researchers at UW, Google, Stanford, Amazon, Columbia, and Berkeley.
Gabriel Ilharco*, Mitchell Wortsman*, Nicholas Carlini, Rohan Taori, Achal Dave, Vaishaal Shankar, John Miller, Hongseok Namkoong, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, Ali Farhadi, Ludwig Schmidt
Special thanks to Jong Wook Kim and Alec Radford for help with reproducing CLIP!
If you found this repository useful, please consider citing:
@software{ilharco_gabriel_2021_5143773,
author = {Ilharco, Gabriel and
Wortsman, Mitchell and
Carlini, Nicholas and
Taori, Rohan and
Dave, Achal and
Shankar, Vaishaal and
Namkoong, Hongseok and
Miller, John and
Hajishirzi, Hannaneh and
Farhadi, Ali and
Schmidt, Ludwig},
title = {OpenCLIP},
month = jul,
year = 2021,
note = {If you use this software, please cite it as below.},
publisher = {Zenodo},
version = {0.1},
doi = {10.5281/zenodo.5143773},
url = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5143773}
}
@inproceedings{Radford2021LearningTV,
title={Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision},
author={Alec Radford and Jong Wook Kim and Chris Hallacy and A. Ramesh and Gabriel Goh and Sandhini Agarwal and Girish Sastry and Amanda Askell and Pamela Mishkin and Jack Clark and Gretchen Krueger and Ilya Sutskever},
booktitle={ICML},
year={2021}
}