add mail service #23
add mail service #23
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several updates across various workflow files and configurations, primarily enhancing caching mechanisms and modifying scripts for improved efficiency. Key changes include the addition of caching steps for Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Warning Tool Failures:Tool Failure Count:Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (21)
apps/api/package.json (2)
9-9: Consider expanding format patterns.The formatting scripts only target TypeScript and MDX files. Consider including other file types like JSON, CSS, etc., if they exist in your project.
- "format:write": "prettier --write \"**/*.{ts,tsx,mdx}\" --cache", - "format:check": "prettier --check \"**/*.{ts,tsx,mdx}\" --cache" + "format:write": "prettier --write \"**/*.{ts,tsx,mdx,json,css,scss}\" --cache", + "format:check": "prettier --check \"**/*.{ts,tsx,mdx,json,css,scss}\" --cache"Also applies to: 12-13
10-11: Enhance test and DB scripts.
- The test script with
--runflag only runs tests once. Consider adding watch mode for development.- The db:generate script might benefit from additional Prisma options.
- "test": "vitest --run", + "test": "vitest", + "test:ci": "vitest --run", "db:generate": "prisma generate", + "db:push": "prisma db push", + "db:studio": "prisma studio"apps/app/package.json (2)
6-6: Review port configuration strategy.A few concerns about the port configuration:
- Hard-coded ports (3002, 4444) might cause conflicts in development environments
- Port 4444 is non-standard and might be blocked by some firewalls
- The port number is duplicated in both
startandpreviewscriptsConsider:
- Using environment variables for port configuration
- Using a more standard port range (3000-3999 for dev, 8000-8999 for prod)
Example implementation:
- "dev": "next dev -p 3002 --turbopack", - "start": "next start -p 4444", - "preview": "next build && next start -p 4444", + "dev": "next dev -p ${PORT:-3000} --turbopack", + "start": "next start -p ${PORT:-8000}", + "preview": "next build && next start -p ${PORT:-8000}",Also applies to: 8-8, 9-9
11-13: LGTM! Well-structured formatting scripts.The new formatting and linting scripts follow good practices with performance considerations (--cache) and proper file type coverage.
Consider adding
.jsonto the format patterns since this is a crucial file type in a Node.js project:- "format:write": "prettier --write \"**/*.{ts,tsx,mdx}\" --cache", - "format:check": "prettier --check \"**/*.{ts,tsx,mdx}\" --cache" + "format:write": "prettier --write \"**/*.{ts,tsx,mdx,json}\" --cache", + "format:check": "prettier --check \"**/*.{ts,tsx,mdx,json}\" --cache".github/workflows/test-multiple-node-versions.yml (3)
Line range hint
18-18: Review Node.js version matrix configuration.The Node.js version matrix includes potentially problematic versions:
- Node.js 22.11.0 and 23.1.0 are experimental/unstable versions
- Node.js 19.x is End-of-Life
Consider using only LTS versions (18.x and 20.x) for production testing.matrix: - node-version: [20.18.0, 18.20.4, 22.11.0, 19.9.0, 23.1.0] # we dont support bellow v18 + node-version: [20.18.0, 18.20.4] # LTS versions only🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 44-44: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
Line range hint
21-27: Update GitHub Actions to latest versions.The workflow uses outdated versions of GitHub Actions:
- actions/checkout@v2 → v4
- actions/setup-node@v2 → v4
- name: Checkout code - uses: actions/checkout@v2 + uses: actions/checkout@v4 - name: Set up Node.js - uses: actions/setup-node@v2 + uses: actions/setup-node@v4🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 44-44: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
42-46: Fix formatting and consider adding test flags.There's a trailing whitespace on line 44 that should be removed. Also, consider adding the
--no-bailflag to continue testing all files even if one fails.- name: Install dependencies - run: pnpm install - + run: pnpm install - name: Run tests - run: pnpm test + run: pnpm test --no-bail🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 44-44: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
turbo.json (2)
28-35: LGTM! Format task configurations are well-structured.The separation of check and write tasks provides good control over formatting operations.
Consider adding a comment in the JSON to document the purpose of these format tasks:
{ "$schema": "https://turbo.build/schema.json", "ui": "tui", + // Tasks configuration for building, testing, linting, and formatting + // format:check: Verifies formatting without making changes + // format:write: Applies formatting changes "tasks": {
Line range hint
5-35: Well-structured task organization enhances workflow efficiency.The clear separation between test, lint, and format tasks with appropriate cache settings creates a robust and maintainable build pipeline. The dependency configurations ensure correct task execution order.
Consider these potential enhancements for future iterations:
- Add input globs to lint and format tasks to optimize for monorepo setups
- Consider implementing shared cache settings using pipeline configurations
apps/api/app/api/[[...route]]/route.ts (1)
51-54: Consider enhancing health check endpoint.While the current implementation is functional, consider adding more meaningful health metrics such as:
- Database connection status
- Memory usage
- System uptime
apps/www/package.json (2)
6-9: Consider environment-based port configurationWhile specifying ports explicitly is good for local development coordination, consider making these configurable through environment variables to avoid conflicts in different environments.
- "dev": "next dev -p 3003 --turbopack", - "start": "next start -p 3333", - "preview": "next build && next start -p 3333", + "dev": "next dev -p ${PORT:-3003} --turbopack", + "start": "next start -p ${PORT:-3333}", + "preview": "next build && next start -p ${PORT:-3333}",
Line range hint
31-32: Review the use of React RC version in productionUsing a release candidate version of React (
19.0.0-rc-02c0e824-20241028) in production could lead to stability issues. Consider using the latest stable version unless there's a specific requirement for the RC features.- "react": "19.0.0-rc-02c0e824-20241028", - "react-dom": "19.0.0-rc-02c0e824-20241028", + "react": "^18.2.0", + "react-dom": "^18.2.0",.github/workflows/lint-and-test.yml (4)
31-37: Update actions/setup-node to v3 for better pnpm support.While the cache configuration is correct, consider updating
actions/setup-nodefrom v2 to v3 for better pnpm support and built-in caching capabilities.- uses: actions/setup-node@v2 + uses: actions/setup-node@v3 with: node-version: '21.7.1' + cache: 'pnpm'
42-43: Add error handling to lint step.Consider adding continue-on-error and better error reporting for the lint step.
- name: Run Lint - run: pnpm lint + run: | + pnpm lint || { + echo "::error::Linting failed. Please fix the issues above." + exit 1 + }
61-67: Consider using reusable workflows to reduce duplication.The cache configuration is duplicated between lint and test jobs. Consider creating a reusable workflow for the common setup steps.
Example structure:
# .github/workflows/setup-pnpm.yml name: Setup PNPM runs: using: composite steps: - uses: actions/setup-node@v3 with: node-version: '21.7.1' cache: 'pnpm' - run: npm install -g pnpm - uses: actions/cache@v3 with: path: ~/.pnpm-store key: ${{ runner.os }}-pnpm-${{ hashFiles('**/pnpm-lock.yaml') }} restore-keys: | ${{ runner.os }}-pnpm-
72-73: Enhance test reporting and artifact handling.Consider adding test result reporting and artifact upload for better visibility of test outcomes.
- name: Run tests - run: pnpm test + run: pnpm test --reporter=junit --output-file=junit.xml + - name: Upload test results + if: always() + uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3 + with: + name: test-results + path: junit.xmlpackage.json (1)
8-26: Consider implementing workspace-specific configuration files.For better maintainability as the monorepo grows:
- Consider moving workspace-specific scripts to their respective package.json files
- Use
nxor similar tools for intelligent script execution and dependency management- Implement proper error handling instead of relying on --force flags
This will improve scalability and make the build process more robust.
.github/workflows/format-and-push.yml (2)
15-17: Fix trailing space in permissions block.The permissions block is correctly added with appropriate write access for pushing changes.
permissions: - contents: write + contents: write🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 16-16: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
45-54: Improve shell script robustness.The two-step formatting approach is well-designed, but the shell script could be more robust.
if pnpm format:check; then - echo "Formatting is correct" + echo 'Formatting is correct' else - echo "Formatting required" + echo 'Formatting required' - echo "formatting_required=true" >> $GITHUB_ENV + echo 'formatting_required=true' >> "$GITHUB_ENV" fi🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
47-47: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:5:38: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
apps/api/tests/hello.test.ts (2)
5-14: Consider enhancing the Prisma mock setup.While the mock setup is functional, consider these improvements:
- Move the Prisma mock to a separate test utils file for reuse across test files
- Add TypeScript types to the mock functions for better type safety
Example implementation:
// __mocks__/db.ts import { vi } from 'vitest' import type { User, PrismaClient } from '@prisma/client' export const mockPrisma = { user: { findMany: vi.fn<[], Promise<User[]>>(), create: vi.fn<[{ data: Partial<User> }], Promise<User>>(), update: vi.fn<[{ where: { id: string }, data: Partial<User> }], Promise<User>>(), delete: vi.fn<[{ where: { id: string } }], Promise<User>>(), }, } as unknown as PrismaClient
83-94: Separate health check tests.Consider moving the health check test to its own describe block for better organization, as it's a different concern from user management endpoints.
Example structure:
describe("Health Check", () => { it("GET /api/health should return health status", async () => { // ... existing test code ... }); it("should include additional health metrics", async () => { // Add test for checking database connection, mail service status, etc. }); });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
.github/workflows/format-and-push.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/lint-and-test.yml(2 hunks).github/workflows/test-multiple-node-versions.yml(1 hunks).npmrc(1 hunks)apps/api/app/api/[[...route]]/route.ts(1 hunks)apps/api/package.json(1 hunks)apps/api/tests/hello.test.ts(1 hunks)apps/app/package.json(1 hunks)apps/www/package.json(2 hunks)package.json(2 hunks)turbo.json(2 hunks)vitest.workspace.ts(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- vitest.workspace.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint
.github/workflows/format-and-push.yml
27-27: the runner of "actions/setup-node@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
47-47: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:5:38: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
🪛 yamllint
.github/workflows/format-and-push.yml
[error] 16-16: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
.github/workflows/test-multiple-node-versions.yml
[error] 44-44: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
🔇 Additional comments (24)
.npmrc (2)
1-1:
Consider security implications of hoisting all packages.
While hoisting all packages can improve build performance and reduce disk space usage, it may expose your application to security risks:
- Dependency confusion attacks become more likely
- All dependencies become available at the root level
- Potential for unintended access to transitive dependencies
Consider using a more selective hoisting pattern by explicitly listing only the packages that need hoisting.
Let's check for any existing hoisting patterns or security configurations:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the package management setup to better understand the context and implications.
Let me check the workspace configuration and any existing hoisting patterns in the monorepo setup.
Hoisting pattern is appropriate for this monorepo setup
The public-hoist-pattern[]=* configuration is actually appropriate in this context because:
- This is a monorepo using pnpm workspaces (as evidenced by pnpm-workspace.yaml and package.json)
- The project uses modern tooling (Next.js, TypeScript, Turbo) that often requires shared dependencies
- Hoisting is necessary for compatibility with tools like Next.js that expect dependencies at the root
- The project is marked as
private: true, reducing the risk of dependency confusion attacks
The configuration aligns with pnpm's recommended practices for monorepos where workspace packages need access to shared dependencies.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for existing security-related configurations
rg -l 'hoist|security' .npmrc package.json
Length of output: 51
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for package manager and workspace configuration
cat package.json
# Look for any workspace or monorepo configuration
fd -e yaml -e yml -e json -H workspace
fd pnpm-workspace.yaml
# Check for existing dependency management configurations
cat .npmrc
Length of output: 1691
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check workspace configuration
cat pnpm-workspace.yaml
# Look for any existing package-specific hoisting configurations in apps and packages
fd -t f -e npmrc . apps packages
# Check if there are any other dependency management related files
fd -t f -e lock -e yaml -e json . | rg -i "package-lock|yarn|pnpm-lock"
Length of output: 188
1-1: Clarify the relationship between package hoisting and mail service.
This configuration change appears unrelated to the PR's stated objective of adding a mail service. Please clarify:
- Why is this hoisting configuration necessary for the mail service?
- Are there specific dependencies that require hoisting?
Let's check for mail-related dependencies that might benefit from hoisting:
apps/api/package.json (3)
17-17: Clarify contentlayer2 dependency.
The addition of contentlayer2 seems unrelated to the mail service mentioned in the PR title. Please clarify:
- Is this dependency necessary for the mail service?
- Why use contentlayer2 instead of the standard contentlayer package?
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for contentlayer usage in the codebase
# Expect: Find references to contentlayer in the code
# Search for contentlayer imports or usage
rg "from ['\"]contentlayer2['\"]|require\(['\"]contentlayer2['\"]\)"4-4: Review port configuration and development setup.
A few considerations:
- Using turbopack is experimental and might cause stability issues
- Having different ports for dev (3001) and start/preview (5555) might lead to confusion
- The preview script seems redundant as it does the same as running build and start separately
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential port conflicts in other services
# Expect: No other services using ports 3001 or 5555
# Search for port usage across the codebase
rg -l "3001|5555" -g "package.json"Also applies to: 6-7
2-2: Verify package name change impact.
The package name change from "api" to "plura-api" is more descriptive, but we should ensure it doesn't affect any workspace dependencies.
✅ Verification successful
Package name change is safe to proceed
The package name change from "api" to "plura-api" is safe as:
- No other packages in the workspace directly depend on this package
- The root package.json correctly references it as "plura-api" in its build scripts
- The workspace configuration uses wildcard patterns (
apps/*) which are name-agnostic
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any references to the old package name "api" in workspace packages
# Expect: No direct dependencies on "@repo/api" or similar
# Search for potential references to the old package name
rg -l "\"@repo/api\"" -g "package.json"
Length of output: 172
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more comprehensive search for package dependencies
# Check for any references to both old and new package names in all package.json files
# First, find all package.json files
echo "=== Searching package.json files ==="
fd "package.json$"
echo -e "\n=== Checking for dependencies referencing 'api' or 'plura-api' ==="
rg -l "\"(api|plura-api)\"" -g "package.json"
echo -e "\n=== Checking workspace references in root package.json ==="
cat package.json | grep -A 10 "workspaces"
Length of output: 1053
apps/app/package.json (2)
16-19:
Critical concerns about dependency versions.
Several issues need attention:
- Next.js v15.0.2 seems incorrect as the latest stable version is 14.x
- Using a React RC version (19.0.0-rc) in production is risky
- The addition of contentlayer2 isn't explained in the PR objectives
#!/bin/bash
# Check if contentlayer2 is used in the codebase
rg -l "from ['|\"]contentlayer2['\"]"
# Check for other Next.js version references
rg -l "\"next\": \"15"Recommendations:
- Downgrade Next.js to the latest stable version
- Use the latest stable version of React
- Document the purpose of adding contentlayer2
Also applies to: 25-26
2-2: Verify the scope of package name change.
The package rename from "app" to "plura-app" doesn't seem related to adding a mail service. Please clarify if this is an intentional change within the scope of this PR.
✅ Verification successful
Package name change aligns with project naming convention
The rename from "app" to "plura-app" follows the established naming pattern across the monorepo where all packages are prefixed with "plura-": root package is "plura", and other apps are named "plura-www", "plura-api", and now "plura-app". This change appears to be a necessary alignment with the project's naming convention rather than being related to the mail service feature.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if this name is referenced in other configuration files
rg -l "plura-app"
Length of output: 144
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of package.json files to understand the naming pattern
echo "=== Root package.json ==="
cat package.json | grep -A1 '"name":'
echo -e "\n=== apps/www/package.json ==="
cat apps/www/package.json | grep -A1 '"name":'
echo -e "\n=== apps/api/package.json ==="
cat apps/api/package.json | grep -A1 '"name":'
echo -e "\n=== apps/app/package.json ==="
cat apps/app/package.json | grep -A1 '"name":'
Length of output: 711
.github/workflows/test-multiple-node-versions.yml (1)
34-40: LGTM: Cache configuration looks good.
The pnpm cache configuration is well-structured:
- Uses latest cache action (v3)
- Proper cache key strategy with lockfile hash
- Appropriate restore-keys fallback
turbo.json (2)
5-8: LGTM! Test task configuration is appropriate.
Disabling cache for tests is the correct approach as it ensures fresh test runs each time.
19-27: LGTM! Lint task configurations are well-structured.
The dependency chain and cache settings are appropriate. The separation of lint and lint:fix tasks provides good flexibility.
Let's verify the lint scripts are properly set up in the workspace packages:
✅ Verification successful
Lint scripts are properly configured across all workspace packages ✅
The verification confirms that:
- Root package.json correctly uses Turborepo to orchestrate lint tasks
- All apps (www, app, api) have both
lintandlint:fixscripts using Next.js linting - UI package has the basic
lintscript using ESLint directly
The turbo.json configuration aligns perfectly with the actual package.json implementations.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify lint scripts exist in package.json files
# Expected: Each workspace package should have corresponding lint scripts
# Search for lint script definitions in package.json files
rg '"lint":|"lint:fix":' -g 'package.json'
Length of output: 522
apps/api/app/api/[[...route]]/route.ts (2)
7-7: LGTM!
The Hono app initialization with base path is correctly implemented.
58-63: LGTM!
The export structure is clean and allows for better tree-shaking.
apps/www/package.json (3)
11-13: LGTM! Good addition of formatting and linting scripts
The addition of specific formatting and linting scripts improves code quality consistency. The cache flag in prettier commands is a nice performance optimization.
2-2: Verify project name change impact across the codebase
The project name change from "www" to "plura-www" looks good, but we should verify its impact on other configurations.
✅ Verification successful
Project name change is safe and properly referenced
The name change from "www" to "plura-www" is correctly reflected across the codebase:
- In root package.json, all references use the new "plura-www" name in turbo commands
- In docker-compose.yml, the reference is to the directory path
./apps/wwwwhich is correct - In pnpm-lock.yaml, references are to the directory structure which should remain as
apps/www
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for potential references to the old project name that might need updating
rg -l '\bwww\b' --type yaml --type json
Length of output: 110
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of files that reference 'www' to understand the context
echo "=== package.json ==="
cat package.json | grep -A 5 -B 5 "www"
echo -e "\n=== docker-compose.yml ==="
cat docker-compose.yml | grep -A 5 -B 5 "www"
echo -e "\n=== pnpm-lock.yaml ==="
# Using head to limit output as pnpm-lock.yaml can be very large
cat pnpm-lock.yaml | grep -A 2 -B 2 "www"
Length of output: 1297
24-24: Verify the purpose and version of contentlayer2
The addition of contentlayer2 dependency:
- Its purpose isn't clear from the PR objective of adding mail service
- The version number (0.5.3) seems unusual - the official package is typically named "contentlayer"
.github/workflows/lint-and-test.yml (1)
39-40: Verify the necessity of --shamefully-hoist.
The --shamefully-hoist flag is typically used as a workaround for packages that don't work with pnpm's strict node_modules structure. Consider if this flag is really necessary as it may hide underlying dependency issues.
✅ Verification successful
The --shamefully-hoist flag can be safely removed
The project is a standard Turborepo monorepo using Next.js, and based on the analysis:
- No peer dependency issues were detected in the dependency tree
- The project uses standard React/Next.js dependencies that work well with pnpm's default node_modules structure
- No documented requirements for hoisting in any of the workspace READMEs
- The pnpm-lock.yaml shows proper resolution of dependencies without conflicts
The --shamefully-hoist flag is unnecessary and can be removed from the workflow file.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for potential peer dependency issues that might necessitate hoisting
pnpm list --json | jq -r '.[] | select(.problems != null) | .problems[]'
# Look for packages that might require hoisting
rg -l "require\(.+\)" --type js
Length of output: 214
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check package.json for dependencies that might require hoisting
cat package.json
# Check the require statements in eslint configs to understand dependency usage
cat packages/eslint-config/react-internal.js packages/eslint-config/next.js packages/eslint-config/library.js
# Look for any documented dependency hoisting requirements
fd README.md
Length of output: 3786
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check contents of workspace READMEs for any dependency-related instructions
cat README.md apps/*/README.md packages/*/README.md
# Check for any pnpm-workspace.yaml configuration
cat pnpm-workspace.yaml
# Look for pnpm-lock.yaml to analyze dependency structure
cat pnpm-lock.yaml | head -n 50
Length of output: 7133
package.json (3)
4-11: LGTM: Well-structured workspace configuration!
The workspace configuration properly sets up the monorepo structure, and the author information adds good package ownership metadata.
54-54: LGTM: Appropriate dependency addition.
The addition of vite-tsconfig-paths is appropriate for TypeScript path resolution in Vite projects.
21-23: Review the use of --force flag in lint and test commands.
The --force flag in lint and test commands will continue execution even if some workspaces fail. This could potentially mask important issues.
Let's verify the existence of referenced workspaces:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the workspace structure to better understand the context.
The use of --force flag in lint and test commands is justified in this monorepo setup
The --force flag usage in lint and test commands is appropriate here because:
- The workspace structure is correctly set up with
apps/api,apps/app, andapps/wwwdirectories - The turbo.json configuration shows these tasks are properly configured with
cache: false - In a monorepo setup, you might want to continue linting/testing other packages even if one fails, especially during development
The original concern about masking issues is mitigated since:
- The CI/CD pipeline can still enforce strict checking
- Individual workspace testing can be done without --force when needed
- Failed tasks will still report errors, just won't block other workspaces
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if all referenced workspaces exist
# Expected: Should find directories for www, app, and api in apps/
# Check for workspace directories
echo "Checking workspace directories..."
fd -t d "^(plura-www|plura-app|plura-api)$" apps/
Length of output: 128
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual workspace configuration and structure
# Check turbo.json for workspace configuration
echo "=== Checking turbo.json configuration ==="
cat turbo.json
# Check package.json for workspace configuration
echo -e "\n=== Checking package.json workspace configuration ==="
cat package.json
# List all directories under apps to see actual structure
echo -e "\n=== Listing directories under apps/ ==="
ls -la apps/
Length of output: 3133
.github/workflows/format-and-push.yml (2)
34-41: LGTM! Efficient caching implementation.
The pnpm caching configuration is well-implemented with:
- Correct cache path for pnpm store
- Proper cache key strategy with fallback
- Usage of latest cache action version
55-57: LGTM! Well-implemented conditional formatting.
The conditional formatting step is correctly implemented using the environment variable.
apps/api/tests/hello.test.ts (3)
1-3: LGTM! Clean and clear imports.
The imports are well-organized, separating test utilities, route handlers, and database client.
16-19: LGTM! Good test hygiene.
The beforeEach hook ensures clean test isolation by clearing all mocks between tests.
1-94: Verify mail service integration tests.
Given that this PR adds mail service functionality, there seems to be a gap in test coverage. The current tests only cover basic CRUD operations for users.
Let's check if there are any mail service-related files that should be tested:
Would you like me to help create test cases for the mail service functionality?
| .post(async (c) => { | ||
| const body = await c.req.json(); | ||
| console.log(body); | ||
| const test = await prisma.user.create({ | ||
| data: body, | ||
| }); | ||
| return c.json({ | ||
| test, | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add input validation and error handling in POST endpoint.
The POST endpoint needs:
- Input validation
- Error handling for database operations
Implement these safety measures:
.post(async (c) => {
+ try {
const body = await c.req.json();
- console.log(body);
+ const { name, email } = body;
+ if (!name || !email) {
+ return c.json({ error: "Missing required fields" }, 400);
+ }
const test = await prisma.user.create({
data: body,
});
return c.json({
test,
});
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error("Create failed:", error);
+ return c.json({ error: "Failed to create user" }, 500);
+ }
});📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| .post(async (c) => { | |
| const body = await c.req.json(); | |
| console.log(body); | |
| const test = await prisma.user.create({ | |
| data: body, | |
| }); | |
| return c.json({ | |
| test, | |
| }); | |
| .post(async (c) => { | |
| try { | |
| const body = await c.req.json(); | |
| const { name, email } = body; | |
| if (!name || !email) { | |
| return c.json({ error: "Missing required fields" }, 400); | |
| } | |
| const test = await prisma.user.create({ | |
| data: body, | |
| }); | |
| return c.json({ | |
| test, | |
| }); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| console.error("Create failed:", error); | |
| return c.json({ error: "Failed to create user" }, 500); | |
| } | |
| }); |
| .delete(async (c) => { | ||
| const test = await prisma.user.delete({ | ||
| where: { | ||
| id: "2", | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
| return c.json({ | ||
| test, | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add error handling and remove hardcoded ID in DELETE endpoint.
Similar issues exist in the DELETE endpoint:
- Hardcoded ID "2"
- No error handling
Apply this improvement:
.delete(async (c) => {
+ try {
+ const { id } = await c.req.json();
+ if (!id) {
+ return c.json({ error: "Missing user ID" }, 400);
+ }
const test = await prisma.user.delete({
where: {
- id: "2",
+ id,
},
});
return c.json({
test,
});
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error("Delete failed:", error);
+ return c.json({ error: "Failed to delete user" }, 500);
+ }
})📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| .delete(async (c) => { | |
| const test = await prisma.user.delete({ | |
| where: { | |
| id: "2", | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| return c.json({ | |
| test, | |
| }); | |
| .delete(async (c) => { | |
| try { | |
| const { id } = await c.req.json(); | |
| if (!id) { | |
| return c.json({ error: "Missing user ID" }, 400); | |
| } | |
| const test = await prisma.user.delete({ | |
| where: { | |
| id, | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| return c.json({ | |
| test, | |
| }); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| console.error("Delete failed:", error); | |
| return c.json({ error: "Failed to delete user" }, 500); | |
| } | |
| }) |
| .patch(async (c) => { | ||
| const name = await c.req.json(); | ||
| const test = await prisma.user.update({ | ||
| where: { | ||
| id: "123", | ||
| }, | ||
| data: { | ||
| name: name.name, | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
| return c.json({ | ||
| test, | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add error handling and remove hardcoded ID in PATCH endpoint.
The PATCH endpoint has several issues:
- Hardcoded ID "123" in the where clause
- No validation of input data
- Missing error handling for database operations
Consider this safer implementation:
.patch(async (c) => {
+ try {
+ const { id, name } = await c.req.json();
+ if (!id || !name) {
+ return c.json({ error: "Missing required fields" }, 400);
+ }
const test = await prisma.user.update({
where: {
- id: "123",
+ id,
},
data: {
name: name.name,
},
});
return c.json({
test,
});
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error("Update failed:", error);
+ return c.json({ error: "Failed to update user" }, 500);
+ }
})📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| .patch(async (c) => { | |
| const name = await c.req.json(); | |
| const test = await prisma.user.update({ | |
| where: { | |
| id: "123", | |
| }, | |
| data: { | |
| name: name.name, | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| return c.json({ | |
| test, | |
| }); | |
| .patch(async (c) => { | |
| try { | |
| const { id, name } = await c.req.json(); | |
| if (!id || !name) { | |
| return c.json({ error: "Missing required fields" }, 400); | |
| } | |
| const test = await prisma.user.update({ | |
| where: { | |
| id, | |
| }, | |
| data: { | |
| name: name.name, | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| return c.json({ | |
| test, | |
| }); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| console.error("Update failed:", error); | |
| return c.json({ error: "Failed to update user" }, 500); | |
| } | |
| }) |
| - name: Install dependencies | ||
| run: pnpm install |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maintain consistent installation flags across jobs.
The test job's installation command differs from the lint job (missing --shamefully-hoist). This inconsistency could lead to different dependency resolutions between jobs.
- name: Install dependencies
- run: pnpm install
+ run: pnpm install --shamefully-hoist📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| - name: Install dependencies | |
| run: pnpm install | |
| - name: Install dependencies | |
| run: pnpm install --shamefully-hoist |
| jobs: | ||
| format: | ||
| runs-on: ubuntu-latest | ||
|
|
||
| steps: | ||
| - name: Checkout code | ||
| uses: actions/checkout@v2 | ||
| uses: actions/checkout@v3 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Update setup-node action to v3.
While the checkout action has been correctly updated to v3, the setup-node action is using an outdated version.
- uses: actions/setup-node@v2
+ uses: actions/setup-node@v3Also applies to: 27-29
| it("POST http:/localhost:3000/api/hello should create a new user", async () => { | ||
| // Mock the response of prisma.user.create | ||
| const newUser = { id: "123", name: "New User" }; | ||
| prisma.user.create.mockResolvedValue(newUser); | ||
|
|
||
| const req = new Request("http:/localhost:3000/api/hello", { | ||
| method: "POST", | ||
| body: JSON.stringify(newUser), | ||
| }); | ||
| const res = await POST(req); | ||
|
|
||
| expect(res.status).toBe(200); | ||
| const json = await res.json(); | ||
| expect(json.test).toEqual(newUser); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add comprehensive test coverage for error cases.
The CRUD operation tests only cover happy paths. Consider adding tests for:
- Invalid request bodies
- Non-existent users for update/delete
- Database errors
- Input validation failures
Also, fix the URL format in the test cases (should be "http://localhost:3000" instead of "http:/localhost:3000").
Example test case:
it("POST should return 400 for invalid user data", async () => {
const req = new Request("http://localhost:3000/api/hello", {
method: "POST",
body: JSON.stringify({ invalid: "data" }),
});
const res = await POST(req);
expect(res.status).toBe(400);
const json = await res.json();
expect(json.error).toBeDefined();
});Also applies to: 37-50, 52-66, 68-81
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
pnpmmodules to enhance dependency management in workflows.Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores