add auth #26
add auth #26
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several significant changes across multiple files in the project. Key modifications include the addition of new API endpoints for user management and email functionalities, updates to TypeScript configurations, and enhancements to the project structure, including new package definitions. Notably, the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 54
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (35)
vitest.workspace.ts (1)
1-3: Consider enhancing the test configuration.While the current configuration is functional, consider adding these commonly useful Vitest configuration options:
- Test environment settings
- Coverage reporting configuration
- Global timeout settings
- Test matching patterns
Example enhancement:
+import { defineWorkspace } from 'vitest/config' + -export default [ - 'packages/*' - ] +export default defineWorkspace([ + { + test: { + include: ['packages/*'], + environment: 'node', + coverage: { + provider: 'v8', + reporter: ['text', 'json', 'html'], + }, + globalTimeout: 60_000, + testMatch: ['**/*.test.ts', '**/*.spec.ts'], + }, + }, +])apps/www/app/(auth)/sign-up/page.tsx (2)
3-9: Enhance the page component with metadata and error handling.While the component follows Next.js naming conventions, consider these production-ready improvements:
- Add page metadata for SEO
- Implement error boundaries
- Consider loading states
Here's a suggested implementation:
import { Metadata } from 'next' import { ErrorBoundary } from '@/components/error-boundary' import { SignUp } from '@/components/auth/SignUp' export const metadata: Metadata = { title: 'Sign Up - Your App Name', description: 'Create a new account to get started' } export default function SignUpPage() { return ( <div className="w-full h-screen flex items-center justify-center"> <ErrorBoundary fallback={<div>Something went wrong</div>}> <SignUp /> </ErrorBoundary> </div> ); }
5-7: Consider accessibility improvements.The centered layout looks good, but consider adding semantic HTML and ARIA attributes for better accessibility.
-<div className="w-full h-screen flex items-center justify-center"> +<main + className="w-full h-screen flex items-center justify-center" + role="main" + aria-labelledby="signup-heading" +> + <h1 id="signup-heading" className="sr-only">Sign Up</h1> <SignUp /> -</div> +</main>apps/www/app/(auth)/sign-in/page.tsx (2)
6-7: Remove unnecessary JSX expression.The
{" "}expression adds no meaningful whitespace and should be removed.<div className="w-full h-screen flex items-center justify-center"> - {" "} <SignIn />
3-10: Add metadata and error boundary for production readiness.Consider the following improvements:
- Add page metadata for SEO
- Wrap SignIn with an error boundary for graceful error handling
Here's how to implement these improvements:
import { Metadata } from 'next' import { ErrorBoundary } from 'react-error-boundary' export const metadata: Metadata = { title: 'Sign In', description: 'Sign in to your account' } function ErrorFallback() { return ( <div className="text-center p-4"> <h2 className="text-red-600">Something went wrong</h2> <p>Please try again later or contact support if the problem persists.</p> </div> ) } export default function SignInPage() { return ( <div className="w-full h-screen flex items-center justify-center"> <ErrorBoundary FallbackComponent={ErrorFallback}> <SignIn /> </ErrorBoundary> </div> ) }apps/www/lib/server.ts (2)
4-16: Add TypeScript types for better type safety.The functions lack return type definitions, which could lead to runtime type errors.
Consider adding proper TypeScript interfaces:
interface Session { // Define session properties id: string; userId: string; // ... other properties } export const getMultipleSessions = async (): Promise<Session[]> => { // ... implementation }; export const getSession = async (): Promise<Session> => { // ... implementation };
4-16: Consider implementing request caching.For better performance, consider implementing a caching strategy using Next.js built-in caching mechanisms.
You can add cache options to the fetch requests:
const fetchOptions = { headers: await headers(), next: { revalidate: 60 }, // Cache for 60 seconds };apps/www/app/(auth)/dashboard/page.tsx (2)
1-2: Consider adding type imports for session data.For better type safety and documentation, consider importing and using types for the session data structures.
import AccountSwitcher from "@/components/custom/account-switcher"; import { getMultipleSessions, getSession } from "@/lib/server"; +import type { Session } from "@/types/auth";
11-11: Remove commented debug code.Remove the commented-out debug code before merging to production.
- {/* <pre>{JSON.stringify(multipleSessions,null,2)}</pre> */}apps/www/components/ui/label.tsx (2)
9-11: Consider adding variants for different label statesThe current implementation only includes base styles. Consider adding variants for different label states (e.g., error, required, optional) to enhance reusability and consistency.
const labelVariants = cva( "text-sm font-medium leading-none peer-disabled:cursor-not-allowed peer-disabled:opacity-70", + { + variants: { + variant: { + default: "", + error: "text-destructive", + required: "after:content-['*'] after:text-destructive after:ml-0.5", + optional: "after:content-['(optional)'] after:text-muted-foreground after:ml-0.5" + } + }, + defaultVariants: { + variant: "default" + } + } );
13-24: LGTM! Well-implemented component with proper type safetyThe implementation follows React best practices with proper ref forwarding and type safety. Consider adding prop validation for better runtime safety.
+interface LabelProps extends + React.ComponentPropsWithoutRef<typeof LabelPrimitive.Root>, + VariantProps<typeof labelVariants> { + // Add any additional props here +} -const Label = React.forwardRef< +const Label = React.forwardRef< React.ElementRef<typeof LabelPrimitive.Root>, - React.ComponentPropsWithoutRef<typeof LabelPrimitive.Root> & - VariantProps<typeof labelVariants> + LabelProps >(({ className, ...props }, ref) => (.github/workflows/test-multiple-node-versions.yml (2)
Line range hint
18-18: Review Node.js version matrix for production stabilityThe matrix includes Node.js 22.11.0 and 23.1.0 which are experimental/unstable versions. For production CI, it's recommended to stick with LTS (Long Term Support) versions to ensure stability.
Consider updating the matrix to include only stable LTS versions:
matrix: - node-version: [20.18.0, 18.20.4, 22.11.0, 19.9.0, 23.1.0] # we dont support bellow v18 + node-version: [20.18.0, 18.20.4] # LTS versions only, we dont support below v18🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 44-44: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
42-46: Fix formatting and streamline test steps.The test steps are correctly structured, but there's a minor formatting issue.
Apply this diff to remove trailing spaces:
- name: Install dependencies run: pnpm install - + - name: Run tests run: pnpm test🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 44-44: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
packages/mail/src/index.ts (1)
1-39: Review security considerations for email handling.Please consider the following security aspects:
- Rate limiting should be implemented to prevent abuse
- Email templates should be sanitized to prevent XSS
- Logging should be added for audit trails
- Access to these functions should be restricted through proper authentication
Would you like assistance in implementing these security measures?
turbo.json (1)
21-29: Consider caching lint results for faster CI runs.While the current configuration is valid, you might want to consider enabling caching for the lint task (but not lint:fix) to speed up CI runs. Lint results can be safely cached if the inputs haven't changed.
"lint": { "dependsOn": ["^lint"], - "cache": false, + "cache": true, - "outputs": [] + "outputs": [".eslintcache"] },packages/auth/src/auth.ts (1)
34-36: Add error handling for auth initializationThe auth initialization should be wrapped in a try-catch block to handle potential configuration errors gracefully.
-export const auth = betterAuth(config); +export const auth = (() => { + try { + return betterAuth(config); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to initialize authentication:', error); + throw error; + } +})();apps/www/components/custom/account-switcher.tsx (4)
12-12: Remove console.log statementsRemove debug console.log statements before deploying to production.
const onSelect = async (sessionId: string) => { - console.log(sessionId); const active = await authClient.multiSession.setActive({ sessionId: sessionId, }); - console.log(active); router.refresh(); };Also applies to: 17-17
5-8: Add input validation for propsThe Props interface should ensure non-empty session array and valid activeSession.
Consider adding runtime validation:
interface Props { session: Session[]; activeSession: Session; } function validateProps(props: Props): void { if (!props.session.length) { throw new Error("Session array cannot be empty"); } if (!props.session.find(s => s.session.id === props.activeSession.session.id)) { throw new Error("activeSession must exist in session array"); } }
25-25: Extract CSS classes to constantsThe inline CSS classes could be extracted for better maintainability.
+ const SELECT_STYLES = "border-2 border-gray-300[0.3] rounded-md p-2"; <select onChange={(e) => onSelect(e.target.value)} value={activeSession.session.id} - className="border-2 border-gray-300[0.3] rounded-md p-2" + className={SELECT_STYLES} >
13-15: Simplify object property when key matches value nameThe sessionId property can be simplified using object shorthand notation.
const active = await authClient.multiSession.setActive({ - sessionId: sessionId, + sessionId, });package.json (2)
4-7: Consider using organization details instead of personal information.For a project-level package.json, it's recommended to use organization or project-specific contact information rather than personal social media handles.
"author": { - "name": "saidevdhal", - "url": "https://twitter.com/SaidevDhal" + "name": "Your Organization", + "url": "https://github.com/your-org/plura" },
21-23: Reconsider using --force flag in lint and test commands.The
--forceflag bypasses Turborepo's cache, which might unnecessarily increase CI/CD execution time. Consider removing it unless there's a specific reason for forcing re-runs.- "lint": "turbo run lint --force", + "lint": "turbo run lint", - "test": "turbo run test --force", + "test": "turbo run test",.github/workflows/format-and-push.yml (2)
15-17: Fix trailing whitespace in permissions block.The
contents: writeline contains trailing whitespace.permissions: - contents: write + contents: write🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 16-16: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
45-57: Improve shell script safety in format check step.The format check implementation is good, but the shell script could be made safer by using proper quoting.
run: | - if pnpm format:check; then - echo "Formatting is correct" + if "$(pnpm format:check)"; then + echo "Formatting is correct" else - echo "Formatting required" - echo "formatting_required=true" >> $GITHUB_ENV + echo "Formatting required" + echo "formatting_required=true" >> "$GITHUB_ENV" fi🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
47-47: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:5:38: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
apps/www/components/custom/Sign-In.tsx (1)
49-81: Improve form UX with better placeholders and loading state.The current implementation needs several UX improvements:
+ import { useState } from "react" + import { Eye, EyeOff } from "lucide-react" export default function SignIn() { + const [showPassword, setShowPassword] = useState(false) + const isLoading = form.formState.isSubmitting // ... rest of the component ... return ( <Form {...form}> <form onSubmit={form.handleSubmit(onSubmit)} className="space-y-8"> <FormField control={form.control} name="email" render={({ field }) => ( <FormItem> <FormLabel>Email</FormLabel> <FormControl> - <Input placeholder="shadcn" {...field} /> + <Input + placeholder="Enter your email" + type="email" + disabled={isLoading} + {...field} + /> </FormControl> <FormMessage /> </FormItem> )} /> <FormField control={form.control} name="password" render={({ field }) => ( <FormItem> <FormLabel>Password</FormLabel> - <FormControl> - <Input placeholder="shadcn" type="password" {...field} /> + <FormControl className="relative"> + <Input + placeholder="Enter your password" + type={showPassword ? "text" : "password"} + disabled={isLoading} + {...field} + /> + <Button + type="button" + variant="ghost" + size="sm" + className="absolute right-2 top-1/2 -translate-y-1/2" + onClick={() => setShowPassword(!showPassword)} + > + {showPassword ? <EyeOff size={16} /> : <Eye size={16} />} + </Button> </FormControl> <FormMessage /> </FormItem> )} /> - <Button type="submit">Submit</Button> + <Button type="submit" disabled={isLoading}> + {isLoading ? "Signing in..." : "Sign in"} + </Button> </form> </Form> );apps/www/components/custom/Sign-up.tsx (3)
8-18: Remove unused import.The
FormDescriptioncomponent is imported but never used in the code.import { Form, FormControl, - FormDescription, FormField, FormItem, FormLabel, FormMessage, } from "@/components/ui/form";🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 11-11: 'FormDescription' is defined but never used.
(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)
29-33: Add missing default value for name field.The defaultValues object is missing the 'name' field while other fields are initialized.
defaultValues: { + name: "", email: "", password: "", },
51-96: Enhance form accessibility and user experience.The form needs improvements in several areas:
- Generic placeholder text "shadcn" is used for all fields
- Missing loading state for the submit button
- Insufficient accessibility attributes
- <Input placeholder="shadcn" {...field} /> + <Input + placeholder="Enter your full name" + aria-label="Full name" + {...field} + /> // For email field - <Input placeholder="shadcn" {...field} /> + <Input + placeholder="you@example.com" + aria-label="Email address" + type="email" + autoComplete="email" + {...field} + /> // For password field - <Input placeholder="shadcn" type="password" {...field} /> + <Input + placeholder="••••••••" + aria-label="Password" + type="password" + autoComplete="new-password" + {...field} + /> // Update submit button - <Button type="submit">Submit</Button> + <Button + type="submit" + disabled={form.formState.isSubmitting} + > + {form.formState.isSubmitting ? ( + <>Loading...</> + ) : ( + "Create account" + )} + </Button>packages/mail/src/template/template.tsx (1)
96-106: Improve button accessibility and stylingThe button styling could benefit from accessibility improvements and theme constants.
Consider these improvements:
const button = { - backgroundColor: "#5e6ad2", + backgroundColor: "var(--primary-color, #5e6ad2)", borderRadius: "3px", fontWeight: "600", color: "#fff", fontSize: "15px", textDecoration: "none", textAlign: "center" as const, display: "block", - padding: "11px 23px", + padding: "12px 24px", // Increased touch target + margin: "0 auto", // Center the button + maxWidth: "200px", // Limit width for better UX };apps/api/tests/hello.test.ts (4)
1-14: Consider enhancing the Prisma mock setup for better type safety and error handling.The current mock setup could be improved to better match real-world scenarios:
vi.mock("@repo/db", () => ({ prisma: { user: { - findMany: vi.fn(), - create: vi.fn(), - update: vi.fn(), - delete: vi.fn(), + findMany: vi.fn().mockImplementation(async () => []), + create: vi.fn().mockImplementation(async (data) => data), + update: vi.fn().mockImplementation(async (data) => data), + delete: vi.fn().mockImplementation(async () => { + throw new Error('Not implemented') + }), }, }, }));
16-19: Consider adding afterEach cleanup and more comprehensive setup.The test structure is good but could be enhanced with additional cleanup and setup:
describe("API Routes", () => { + const baseUrl = "http://localhost:3000"; + beforeEach(() => { vi.clearAllMocks(); }); + + afterEach(() => { + vi.restoreAllMocks(); + });
23-24: Centralize test data and improve type safety.The test data is duplicated across test cases. Consider centralizing it and adding proper typing:
// At the top of the file interface User { id: string; name: string; } const TEST_USERS: Record<string, User> = { new: { id: "123", name: "New User" }, updated: { id: "123", name: "Updated User" }, deleted: { id: "2", name: "Deleted User" }, };Then use it in tests:
- const newUser = { id: "123", name: "New User" }; + const newUser = TEST_USERS.new;Also applies to: 39-40, 54-55, 70-71
83-94: Health check test could be more comprehensive.The health check test could verify more aspects of the API's health:
it("should include additional health metrics", async () => { const req = new Request("http://localhost:3000/api/health", { method: "GET", }); const res = await GET(req); const json = await res.json(); expect(res.status).toBe(200); expect(json).toMatchObject({ message: "i am alive", status: 200, // Consider adding these fields timestamp: expect.any(Number), version: expect.any(String), database: expect.any(Boolean) }); });apps/api/app/api/[[...route]]/route.ts (2)
9-13: Consider externalizingallowedOriginsinto configuration.Hardcoding allowed origins in the code can make it less flexible and harder to maintain. Consider using environment variables or a configuration file to manage the list of allowed origins, allowing changes without modifying the codebase.
98-104: Ensure consistent export of HTTP methods.Currently,
OPTIONSis exported differently from the other HTTP methods. For consistency and clarity, consider includingOPTIONSin the collective export statement withGET,PATCH,POST, andDELETE.Apply this diff to consolidate the exports:
const GET = handle(app); const POST = handle(app); const PATCH = handle(app); const DELETE = handle(app); -export const OPTIONS = handle(app); -export { GET, PATCH, POST, DELETE }; +const OPTIONS = handle(app); +export { GET, PATCH, POST, DELETE, OPTIONS };
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (37)
.github/workflows/format-and-push.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/lint-and-test.yml(2 hunks).github/workflows/test-multiple-node-versions.yml(1 hunks).npmrc(1 hunks)apps/api/app/api/[[...route]]/hello.ts(1 hunks)apps/api/app/api/[[...route]]/mail.ts(1 hunks)apps/api/app/api/[[...route]]/route.ts(1 hunks)apps/api/package.json(1 hunks)apps/api/tests/hello.test.ts(1 hunks)apps/api/tsconfig.json(2 hunks)apps/app/package.json(1 hunks)apps/www/app/(auth)/dashboard/page.tsx(1 hunks)apps/www/app/(auth)/sign-in/page.tsx(1 hunks)apps/www/app/(auth)/sign-up/page.tsx(1 hunks)apps/www/components/custom/Sign-In.tsx(1 hunks)apps/www/components/custom/Sign-up.tsx(1 hunks)apps/www/components/custom/account-switcher.tsx(1 hunks)apps/www/components/ui/form.tsx(1 hunks)apps/www/components/ui/label.tsx(1 hunks)apps/www/lib/auth-client.ts(1 hunks)apps/www/lib/server.ts(1 hunks)apps/www/package.json(2 hunks)package.json(3 hunks)packages/auth/package.json(1 hunks)packages/auth/src/auth.ts(1 hunks)packages/database/prisma/migrations/20241109113701_auth/migration.sql(1 hunks)packages/database/prisma/migrations/migration_lock.toml(1 hunks)packages/database/prisma/schema.prisma(1 hunks)packages/mail/.gitignore(1 hunks)packages/mail/package.json(1 hunks)packages/mail/src/index.ts(1 hunks)packages/mail/src/template/template.tsx(1 hunks)packages/mail/tsconfig.json(1 hunks)packages/types/package.json(1 hunks)packages/types/src/mail.ts(1 hunks)turbo.json(2 hunks)vitest.workspace.ts(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (7)
- .npmrc
- packages/auth/package.json
- packages/database/prisma/migrations/migration_lock.toml
- packages/mail/.gitignore
- packages/mail/package.json
- packages/mail/tsconfig.json
- packages/types/package.json
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint
.github/workflows/format-and-push.yml
27-27: the runner of "actions/setup-node@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
47-47: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:5:38: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
🪛 yamllint
.github/workflows/format-and-push.yml
[error] 16-16: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
.github/workflows/test-multiple-node-versions.yml
[error] 44-44: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
🪛 eslint
apps/www/components/custom/Sign-In.tsx
[error] 33-33: 'data' is assigned a value but never used.
(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)
[error] 33-33: 'error' is assigned a value but never used.
(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)
[error] 40-40: 'ctx' is defined but never used.
(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)
[error] 41-41: 'ctx' is defined but never used.
(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)
apps/www/components/custom/Sign-up.tsx
[error] 11-11: 'FormDescription' is defined but never used.
(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)
[error] 35-35: 'data' is assigned a value but never used.
(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)
[error] 35-35: 'error' is assigned a value but never used.
(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)
[error] 42-42: 'ctx' is defined but never used.
(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)
[error] 43-43: 'ctx' is defined but never used.
(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)
apps/www/lib/auth-client.ts
[error] 3-3: 'Http2ServerRequest' is defined but never used.
(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)
🔇 Additional comments (49)
vitest.workspace.ts (1)
1-3: LGTM! Basic workspace configuration is correct.
The configuration correctly includes all packages in the packages directory for testing, which aligns with the project's workspace structure.
apps/www/app/(auth)/sign-in/page.tsx (1)
1-1: Verify SignIn component implementation.
Let's verify that the SignIn component is properly implemented with form validation and error handling.
packages/types/src/mail.ts (1)
1-1: LGTM! Good choice using Zod for schema validation.
Zod provides robust runtime type checking and validation capabilities.
apps/www/lib/server.ts (1)
6-6: Review header forwarding security implications.
Blindly forwarding all headers could potentially leak sensitive information. Consider explicitly forwarding only required headers.
Let's check what headers are being forwarded:
Consider creating a utility function that sanitizes and forwards only necessary headers:
const getAuthHeaders = async () => {
const headersList = headers();
return {
'authorization': headersList.get('authorization') || '',
// Add other required headers
};
};apps/www/lib/auth-client.ts (1)
8-13: Consider adding error handling for API connectivity
The auth client setup looks good, but consider adding error handling for API connectivity issues. Also, verify that all exported methods are being used correctly across the application.
apps/www/app/(auth)/dashboard/page.tsx (1)
4-14: Verify session data access control.
Ensure that the getMultipleSessions endpoint has proper access controls to prevent unauthorized access to other users' session data.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the authentication and access controls.
Let me check for the implementation of the headers function and the API routes.
Let me try one final search to locate the API routes and authentication logic.
Let me check the API route implementation for access controls.
Access controls for multi-sessions endpoint are properly implemented
The /multi-sessions endpoint is secured through:
- Global authentication middleware that validates session tokens
- Usage of
auth.api.listDeviceSessionswhich is scoped to the authenticated user - Integration with
better-authlibrary's multi-session plugin that handles device sessions securely
The implementation ensures that users can only access their own session data.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for authentication middleware or access controls in the API route
rg -A 5 "api/multi-sessions"
Length of output: 299
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for the implementation of headers() function and authentication middleware
rg -A 10 "headers\(\)" apps/www/lib/server.ts
# Check for the API route implementation
fd "multi-sessions" --type f
# Look for authentication middleware patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'async function getMultipleSessions() {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 372
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for headers function implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'async function headers() {
$$$
}'
# Look for session API route implementations
fd "session.ts" --type f
# Check for auth middleware
rg -A 10 "middleware" --type ts
Length of output: 114
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for API routes in the app directory structure
fd "route.ts" --type f
# Check for auth-related files
fd "auth" --type f
# Look for session-related implementations
rg -A 10 "getMultipleSessions" --type ts
Length of output: 1714
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the API route implementation
cat "apps/api/app/api/[[...route]]/route.ts"
# Look for authentication middleware in the API
rg -A 10 "session" apps/api/app/api/[[...route]]/route.ts
# Check auth implementation
cat "packages/auth/src/auth.ts"
Length of output: 4840
apps/api/tsconfig.json (2)
37-40: LGTM! Well-structured type definitions setup.
The include paths are properly configured for:
- Next.js types
- Source TypeScript files
- Auth type definitions from the shared packages
This setup aligns well with the monorepo structure and the authentication feature implementation.
15-16: Verify the impact of module resolution changes.
The change from NodeNext to ESNext/Bundler is significant. While this might work better with bundlers, we should ensure it doesn't break Node.js module resolution, especially for authentication-related imports.
Let's verify the module resolution configuration in other workspace packages:
✅ Verification successful
Module resolution settings are consistent with Next.js applications
The change to module: "ESNext" and moduleResolution: "Bundler" in apps/api/tsconfig.json aligns with the configuration used in other Next.js applications in the monorepo (apps/www and apps/app). This is the recommended configuration for Next.js applications and won't break Node.js module resolution in this context since:
- All Next.js apps in the workspace use the same settings (
esnext/bundler) - Other packages extend from base configs and don't override these settings
- The configuration is appropriate for bundled Next.js applications
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check module resolution settings across the workspace
# Expected: Consistent module resolution strategy across related packages
# Search for tsconfig.json files and their module resolution settings
fd tsconfig.json --type f --exec sh -c 'echo "=== $1 ==="; cat "$1" | jq -r ".compilerOptions | select(.module != null or .moduleResolution != null) | {module, moduleResolution}"' sh {}
Length of output: 2598
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a simpler approach to check module resolution settings
fd tsconfig.json --type f --exec sh -c 'echo "=== $1 ==="; cat "$1"' sh {}
Length of output: 3106
apps/www/components/ui/label.tsx (3)
1-8: LGTM! Proper setup with necessary imports
The "use client" directive and imports are correctly structured for a client-side interactive label component.
26-26: LGTM! Clean named export
The named export follows best practices and maintains clean module boundaries.
1-26: Verify integration with authentication forms
Since this Label component is part of the authentication feature, let's verify its integration with related form components.
✅ Verification successful
Label component is properly integrated with authentication forms
The verification shows that the Label component is correctly integrated into the authentication system:
- It's properly imported and used in the form components
- Sign-In.tsx and Sign-up.tsx both use FormLabel (which wraps Label) for email, password, and name fields
- The form.tsx component correctly implements FormLabel using the base Label component with proper accessibility attributes
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for Label component usage in auth-related files
# Expected: Find usage in auth forms/components
# Search for Label imports and usage in auth-related files
rg -l "Label" apps/www/components/auth
rg -l "Label" apps/www/app/(auth)
Length of output: 274
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search to find auth-related files and Label usage
# First, find auth-related directories and files
fd -t d "auth"
# Then search for Label usage across the codebase
rg -l "import.*Label"
# Also search for form-related files that might use Label
fd -t f "form|login|register|sign"
Length of output: 343
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual usage of Label in the sign-in, sign-up, and form components
rg -A 5 "Label" apps/www/components/custom/Sign-In.tsx
rg -A 5 "Label" apps/www/components/custom/Sign-up.tsx
rg -A 5 "Label" apps/www/components/ui/form.tsx
Length of output: 2544
apps/app/package.json (3)
2-2: LGTM! Package name standardization
The name change aligns with the project-wide standardization of package names.
16-19:
Review dependency versions for production readiness
Several concerns with the current dependencies:
- Using React RC version (19.0.0-rc) in production code could be risky, especially for auth features
- The addition of
contentlayer2seems unrelated to the PR's auth objectives
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check contentlayer2 usage
# Expected: Find references to contentlayer2 in the codebase
echo "Checking contentlayer2 usage..."
rg "contentlayer2|from ['\"](contentlayer2|@contentlayer)"Consider:
- Using the latest stable version of React instead of the RC version
- Documenting the purpose of adding
contentlayer2or moving it to a separate PR if unrelated to auth
Also applies to: 25-26, 29-29
6-13: Verify port availability in the development environment
The script changes look good, but let's ensure the port assignments don't conflict with other services.
Consider adding environment variable support for ports
Consider using environment variables for port numbers to make the configuration more flexible:
- "dev": "next dev -p 3002 --turbopack",
+ "dev": "next dev -p ${PORT:-3002} --turbopack",
- "start": "next start -p 4444",
+ "start": "next start -p ${PORT:-4444}",
- "preview": "next build && next start -p 4444"
+ "preview": "next build && next start -p ${PORT:-4444}"✅ Verification successful
Port assignments are correctly configured across applications
The port assignments in the application are well-structured with no conflicts:
- API runs on port 3001
- App (this service) runs on port 3002
- Another service runs on port 3003
- Each service has its own distinct production port (4444, 5555, 3333)
The suggestion to use environment variables for ports is not necessary as the current setup follows a clear port allocation strategy across the monorepo services.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for port assignments across the project
# Expected: No conflicts with ports 3002 and 4444
# Search for port definitions in package.json files and configuration files
echo "Checking port assignments..."
rg -g "package.json" -g "*.config.*" "300[0-9]|4444"
Length of output: 2441
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find port usage
# Search for port numbers in all relevant files
echo "Searching for port numbers in configuration and source files..."
rg -g "!{node_modules,dist,build}/*" "port.*300[0-9]|port.*4444|PORT.*300[0-9]|PORT.*4444"
# Also check for potential environment configuration files
echo -e "\nChecking environment files..."
fd -g ".env*"
# Check other package.json files for dev/start scripts
echo -e "\nChecking other package.json files for port configurations..."
fd -g "package.json" --exec grep -A 5 "\"scripts\":" {}
Length of output: 2266
apps/api/app/api/[[...route]]/hello.ts (1)
1-46: Add authentication middleware and standardize response format.
General architectural recommendations:
- Add authentication middleware to protect these endpoints
- Implement request rate limiting
- Add request logging
- Standardize error responses
#!/bin/bash
# Check for existing auth middleware
rg -l "middleware.*auth"
# Check for existing rate limiting implementation
rg -l "rate.*limit|throttle".github/workflows/test-multiple-node-versions.yml (1)
34-40: LGTM! Caching configuration is well structured.
The cache configuration uses the recommended practices:
- Uses the latest cache action version (v3)
- Properly structured cache key with OS and lock file hash
- Includes fallback restore-keys
turbo.json (2)
7-10: LGTM! Appropriate test configuration.
Disabling cache for tests is the correct approach as it ensures tests always run with fresh state.
30-37: LGTM! Well-structured formatting tasks.
The separation of format checking and writing tasks is a good practice, allowing for different behaviors in CI (check) versus local development (write).
packages/auth/src/auth.ts (1)
1-1: Verify better-auth package configuration
Let's ensure the better-auth package is properly configured in the project.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the better-auth setup by checking the package dependencies and configuration files more thoroughly.
Let me check the actual implementation and usage of better-auth to verify its configuration.
Better-auth is properly configured and implemented
The package is correctly set up with:
- Proper imports and configuration in
packages/auth/src/auth.ts - Complete configuration including database adapter, trusted origins, and security settings
- Client-side implementation in
apps/www/lib/auth-client.ts - Package dependencies properly declared in relevant package.json files
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify better-auth package configuration and dependencies
# Check if better-auth is in package.json
echo "Checking better-auth package configuration..."
rg '"better-auth"' -A 5 'package.json'
# Check for any example configurations or documentation
echo "Checking for better-auth configuration examples..."
fd -t f 'better-auth.*\.(md|js|ts)' --exclude auth.ts
Length of output: 306
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check package.json files recursively in all directories
echo "Checking all package.json files..."
fd package.json --exec cat {}
# Look for better-auth usage in the codebase
echo -e "\nChecking better-auth usage..."
rg -l "better-auth" --type ts --type js
# Check for any configuration files
echo -e "\nChecking for config files..."
fd "config" -e ts -e js -e json --exec cat {}
Length of output: 15715
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation in auth.ts
echo "Checking auth.ts implementation..."
cat packages/auth/src/auth.ts
# Check the client usage
echo -e "\nChecking auth-client.ts implementation..."
cat apps/www/lib/auth-client.ts
# Look for BetterAuthOptions configuration
echo -e "\nChecking for BetterAuthOptions configuration..."
rg -A 5 "BetterAuthOptions" --type ts
Length of output: 2543
apps/api/package.json (4)
34-34: LGTM: dotenv addition is appropriate.
The addition of dotenv for environment variable management is a good practice, especially for managing different port configurations and auth-related environment variables.
16-28:
Review dependency versions and beta packages.
Several concerns about the dependencies:
better-auth@0.8.1-beta.1is a beta version- React version is pinned to a release candidate (
19.0.0-rc-02c0e824-20241028) - Some dependencies lack explicit version ranges
Consider the following actions:
- Evaluate the stability of
better-authbeta version for production use - Consider using a stable React version instead of RC
- Add explicit version ranges for workspace dependencies
#!/bin/bash
# Check for potential security issues in better-auth
# Description: Look for known vulnerabilities or issues
echo "Checking better-auth package..."
rg "better-auth" "pnpm-lock.yaml" -A 5 || true
# Check if React RC version is used consistently
echo "Checking React version consistency..."
fd "package.json" --exec rg "19.0.0-rc-02c0e824-20241028"4-13: Verify port configuration and Turbopack compatibility.
A few considerations about the script changes:
- The development server now runs on port 3001 with Turbopack
- Production server runs on port 5555
- Test script now only runs once instead of watching
Consider the following recommendations:
- Document the port configuration in the project's README
- Consider using environment variables for port configuration instead of hardcoding
- Evaluate if Turbopack is stable enough for your use case, as it's still in beta
Would you like me to help create a PR to implement these recommendations?
2-2: Verify workspace references to the package name.
The package name change from "api" to "plura-api" looks good, but we should verify that all workspace references are updated.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different search strategy to verify the package name references.
Package name change is properly referenced
The package name change from "api" to "plura-api" is correctly referenced throughout the codebase:
- Root package.json uses "plura-api" in turbo filter commands for build and dev scripts
- The workspace configuration correctly uses glob patterns ("apps/*") which works with both old and new names
- No stale references to the old package name were found
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining references to the old package name
# Description: Look for "api" package references in package.json files and workspace configs
# Test 1: Search in package.json files
echo "Checking package.json files for old package name references..."
fd --type f "package.json" --exec rg -l '"api":'
# Test 2: Search in pnpm workspace config
echo "Checking pnpm-workspace.yaml for old package name references..."
rg "api" "pnpm-workspace.yaml" || true
Length of output: 356
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any references to both old and new package names
# Description: Look for package references in various config files
# Test 1: Search for any "api" references in package.json files
echo "Checking for 'api' in package.json files..."
fd "package.json" --exec rg -A 2 -B 2 '"(dependencies|devDependencies|workspaces)".*api'
# Test 2: Check workspace configuration
echo "Checking workspace configuration..."
fd "(pnpm-workspace.yaml|lerna.json|package.json)" --type f --max-depth 1 --exec cat {}
# Test 3: Search for direct "plura-api" references
echo "Checking for new package name references..."
rg "plura-api"
Length of output: 2271
apps/api/app/api/[[...route]]/mail.ts (3)
1-7: LGTM! Clean imports and setup.
The code demonstrates good practices with clear dependency imports and proper initialization of the Hono instance.
62-62: LGTM! Clean export.
The default export of the Hono app instance is correct.
1-62: Verify authentication middleware implementation.
The endpoints handle sensitive email operations and should be protected by authentication middleware.
Let's verify if authentication is properly implemented:
✅ Verification successful
Authentication middleware is properly implemented
The mail routes are protected by authentication middleware. The route.ts file shows:
- Global authentication middleware that checks for valid sessions using
@repo/auth - Mail routes are mounted under the main app which has this authentication middleware
- Unauthorized requests (no valid session) will receive a 401 response
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for auth middleware implementation
echo "Checking for auth middleware..."
rg -l "auth.*middleware" --type ts
# Check for usage of auth decorators or middleware in the current file's directory
echo "Checking for auth usage in API routes..."
rg -l "\.use\(.*auth.*\)" "apps/api/app/api/"
Length of output: 246
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for authentication-related code
echo "Checking for auth-related imports and middleware..."
rg -l "auth|authenticate|jwt|bearer" --type ts "apps/api"
# Check for middleware usage patterns in the mail.ts and surrounding files
echo "Checking for middleware usage patterns..."
rg "\.use\(" --type ts "apps/api"
# Check if there's a central middleware configuration
echo "Checking for middleware configuration files..."
fd -e ts middleware "apps/api"
# Look for security-related configurations
echo "Checking for security configurations..."
fd -e ts -e js security "apps/api"
Length of output: 715
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the route.ts file that contains middleware usage
echo "Checking the middleware implementation in route.ts..."
cat "apps/api/app/api/[[...route]]/route.ts"
# Let's also check if mail routes are imported and used in route.ts
echo "Checking for mail route usage..."
rg "mail" "apps/api/app/api/[[...route]]/route.ts"
Length of output: 2761
.github/workflows/lint-and-test.yml (3)
61-67: LGTM! Cache configuration is properly implemented.
The cache implementation in the test job is consistent with the lint job and follows best practices.
31-37: Verify pnpm store path across different OS environments.
The cache implementation looks good, but let's verify the store path works consistently across different OS environments.
Run the following script to check pnpm's documentation and existing workflows for store path configurations:
✅ Verification successful
Cache path ~/.pnpm-store is correctly configured for cross-platform compatibility
The cache implementation is verified to be consistent across multiple workflow files:
- Used identically in
test-multiple-node-versions.yml,lint-and-test.yml, andformat-and-push.yml - Follows the standard pnpm store path convention using
~/.pnpm-store - Properly uses
${{ runner.os }}in cache key to handle OS-specific caching
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for pnpm store path configurations in existing workflows
# Expected: Confirm if ~/.pnpm-store is the correct path across OS environments
# Search for pnpm store configurations in workflow files
rg -A 2 "pnpm.*store" .github/workflows/
Length of output: 1055
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if there are any pnpm configuration files or documentation that might specify store path
fd -e yaml -e yml -e json -e md pnpm
# Also search for any pnpm store path related configurations in package.json
rg -g "package.json" "store"
# Check if there are any pnpm setup or configuration steps in workflows
rg "pnpm.*config" .github/workflows/
Length of output: 139
39-43: Review the necessity of --shamefully-hoist flag.
The --shamefully-hoist flag modifies the node_modules structure and can potentially cause issues with package resolution. Consider if this flag is necessary for your setup.
Run the following to check if there are specific dependencies requiring hoisting:
package.json (2)
Line range hint 44-57: Verify authentication dependencies are complete.
The PR aims to add authentication, but let's ensure all necessary dependencies are included. Currently seeing:
- better-call (new addition)
- next-auth
- zod (for validation)
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for common auth-related files and configurations
# Look for auth configuration files
echo "Checking for auth config files..."
fd -e ts -e js -e json -g "*auth*config*"
# Look for auth-related components
echo "Checking for auth components..."
fd -e tsx -e jsx -g "*auth*"
# Check for environment variables related to auth
echo "Checking for auth environment variables..."
fd -g "*.env*" --exec grep -l "AUTH_"44-44: Verify the stability of better-call beta version.
Using a beta version (0.2.14-beta.3) of better-call in production could pose stability risks.
Let's check the package status:
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to verify the package status.
Using better-call@0.2.14-beta.3 appears to be a reasonable choice
The package shows healthy development activity:
- Latest version released on Nov 4, 2024 (very recent)
- Active development with 90+ releases since July 2024
- Consistent version progression from 0.0.1 to 0.2.14
- Regular beta releases followed by stable versions
- The beta.3 version you're using is the latest available version
While it's a beta version, the package demonstrates a mature development cycle with proper versioning and frequent updates, suggesting it's actively maintained and production-ready despite the beta tag.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check package status and recent activity
# Get package info from npm
echo "Checking package info..."
npm view better-call time.modified version dist-tags
# Check GitHub activity if repository URL is available
echo "Checking repository activity..."
npm view better-call repository.url
Length of output: 357
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check npm registry directly
curl -s https://registry.npmjs.org/better-call | jq -r '{"latest_version": .["dist-tags"].latest, "versions": keys_unsorted, "time": .time, "maintainers": .maintainers}'
# Look for usage of better-call in the codebase
echo "Checking usage in codebase..."
rg -l "better-call"
# Check package.json for any comments or notes about this dependency
echo "Checking package.json..."
cat package.json | jq -r '.dependencies["better-call"], .devDependencies["better-call"]'
Length of output: 5747
packages/database/prisma/migrations/20241109113701_auth/migration.sql (2)
50-57: LGTM! Foreign key constraints are well-defined
The foreign key constraints are properly set up with appropriate CASCADE rules for maintaining referential integrity.
1-57: Verify existing authentication tables before migration
Let's ensure there are no conflicts with existing authentication tables or data before applying this migration.
✅ Verification successful
Let me run one more verification to check for any previous migrations that might have created similar tables, even if they don't have "auth" in their name.
Migration is safe to proceed
This appears to be the first migration in the database, and the auth-related tables (user, session, account, verification) are not present in any previous migrations. The schema.prisma file correctly reflects these new models, indicating this is a fresh authentication setup.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for existing auth-related tables
echo "Checking for existing auth tables..."
rg -g '*.sql' -B 5 -A 5 'CREATE TABLE.*(?:user|account|session|verification)'
# Check for existing auth-related migrations
echo "Checking for existing auth migrations..."
fd -g '*_auth*.sql' -d 3
Length of output: 3937
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# List all migration files chronologically
echo "Checking all previous migrations..."
fd -g '*.sql' -d 3 packages/database/prisma/migrations | sort
# Check schema.prisma for any existing auth-related models
echo "Checking current schema.prisma..."
rg -g 'schema.prisma' 'model\s+(?:User|Account|Session|Verification)'
Length of output: 583
apps/www/package.json (5)
11-13: Great addition of formatting and linting scripts!
The new scripts enhance code quality consistency:
- Automated fixes with
lint:fix - Prettier integration with caching for better performance
- Proper file patterns for TypeScript and MDX files
26-27:
Caution: Beta versions in production dependencies
The authentication stack includes beta versions which may not be production-ready:
better-auth@0.8.1-beta.1better-call@0.2.14-beta.3
Consider using stable versions for production deployments.
Let's check for known vulnerabilities:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for security advisories
echo "Checking npm advisories for better-auth and better-call:"
npm audit better-auth@0.8.1-beta.1 better-call@0.2.14-beta.3 2>/dev/null || true30-30: Verify contentlayer2 usage
The addition of contentlayer2 seems unrelated to the auth PR objectives.
Let's check its usage:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for contentlayer configuration and usage
echo "Checking contentlayer configuration:"
fd "contentlayer.config"
echo -e "\nChecking contentlayer usage:"
rg -l "import.*contentlayer2"Consider moving this dependency to a separate PR focused on content management features.
2-2: Verify port configuration across services
The application is now configured to run on specific ports:
- Development: 3003
- Production/Preview: 3333
Let's check for potential port conflicts across the workspace:
Also applies to: 6-6, 8-8, 9-9
✅ Verification successful
Port configuration is unique across services
The port configuration for plura-www (3003/3333) does not conflict with other services in the workspace:
- Service 1: 3001/5555
- plura-www: 3003/3333
- Service 2: 3002/4444
Each service has unique development and production ports, ensuring no conflicts.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for port configurations in package.json files
echo "Checking for port configurations in package.json files:"
fd "package.json" --exec rg -A 1 "\"(dev|start|preview)\": .*(port|-p) [0-9]+"
Length of output: 740
16-16: Verify authentication stack integration
The new dependencies form a comprehensive auth stack:
- Core auth:
@repo/auth,@repo/db - Form handling:
@hookform/resolvers,react-hook-form,zod - UI components:
@radix-ui/react-label
Let's verify the integration setup:
Consider documenting the authentication flow and configuration in a README file for better maintainability.
Also applies to: 20-20, 24-25, 38-38, 41-41
✅ Verification successful
Authentication stack is properly integrated
The verification shows a complete and well-structured authentication setup:
- Auth core integration is present in both apps (
apps/wwwandapps/api) with proper imports of@repo/authand@repo/db - Form handling is implemented with dedicated components:
apps/www/components/custom/Sign-up.tsxapps/www/components/custom/Sign-In.tsxapps/www/components/ui/form.tsx
- UI components are properly integrated with form components using Radix UI labels
- Dependencies are correctly declared in respective package.json files
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for auth configuration files
echo "Searching for auth configuration files:"
fd -e ts -e tsx -e json --exec rg -l "auth|session|login"
# Check for form schemas
echo -e "\nSearching for Zod schemas:"
ast-grep --pattern 'const $schema = z.$_'
Length of output: 306
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's break down the verification into smaller chunks
# 1. Check for auth-related files and imports
echo "=== Auth Integration ==="
rg -l "@repo/auth|@repo/db" --type=typescript --type=javascript
# 2. Check for form-related component usage
echo -e "\n=== Form Integration ==="
rg -l "@hookform/resolvers|react-hook-form|zod" --type=typescript --type=javascript
# 3. Check for UI components integration
echo -e "\n=== UI Components ==="
rg -l "@radix-ui/react-label" --type=typescript --type=javascript
# 4. Look for authentication setup files
echo -e "\n=== Auth Setup Files ==="
rg -l "auth.*provider|session.*provider|login.*form" --type=typescript --type=javascript
Length of output: 696
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try without file type restrictions since ripgrep might not recognize typescript/javascript types
# 1. Check for auth-related files and imports
echo "=== Auth Integration ==="
rg -l "@repo/auth|@repo/db"
# 2. Check for form-related component usage
echo -e "\n=== Form Integration ==="
rg -l "@hookform/resolvers|react-hook-form|zod"
# 3. Check for UI components integration
echo -e "\n=== UI Components ==="
rg -l "@radix-ui/react-label"
# 4. Look for authentication setup files
echo -e "\n=== Auth Setup Files ==="
rg -l "auth.*provider|session.*provider|login.*form"
# 5. Check package.json files for dependencies
echo -e "\n=== Dependencies Check ==="
find . -name "package.json" -exec grep -l "@repo/\|@hookform\|react-hook-form\|zod\|@radix-ui" {} \;
Length of output: 1900
.github/workflows/format-and-push.yml (2)
34-41: LGTM: Efficient caching implementation.
The pnpm caching strategy is well-implemented:
- Uses the latest cache action (v3)
- Proper key generation using lock file hash
- Includes fallback restore-keys
45-57: Verify the format:check and format:write scripts exist.
The workflow assumes the existence of format:check and format:write scripts in package.json.
✅ Verification successful
Format scripts are properly configured in the workspace
The format scripts are correctly defined:
- Root
package.jsonhas Turbo-based format scripts that orchestrate formatting across workspaces - All workspace packages (plura-api, plura-app, plura-www) have properly configured Prettier scripts for checking and writing formats
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of required npm scripts
# Expected: Both scripts should be defined in package.json
if [ -f "package.json" ]; then
echo "Checking package.json for required scripts..."
jq '.scripts | select(.["format:check"] != null and .["format:write"] != null)' package.json
else
echo "package.json not found"
exit 1
fi
Length of output: 803
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify if these format scripts are defined in the workspace packages
# First, let's find all package.json files in workspaces
fd package.json | xargs jq -r 'select(.scripts != null) | select(.scripts["format:check"] != null or .scripts["format:write"] != null) | "\(.name):\n format:check: \(.scripts["format:check"])\n format:write: \(.scripts["format:write"])"'
Length of output: 725
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
47-47: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:5:38: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
apps/www/components/custom/Sign-In.tsx (2)
24-31: LGTM!
The form setup follows React Hook Form best practices with proper TypeScript integration.
32-47: Verify security measures for authentication endpoints.
Ensure that the authentication endpoints have proper security measures in place.
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 33-33: 'data' is assigned a value but never used.
(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)
[error] 33-33: 'error' is assigned a value but never used.
(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)
[error] 40-40: 'ctx' is defined but never used.
(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)
[error] 41-41: 'ctx' is defined but never used.
(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)
apps/www/components/custom/Sign-up.tsx (1)
34-49: Verify security measures for the sign-up endpoint.
Please ensure the following security measures are implemented on the backend:
- Rate limiting for sign-up attempts
- CSRF protection
- Password hashing
- Email verification flow
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 35-35: 'data' is assigned a value but never used.
(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)
[error] 35-35: 'error' is assigned a value but never used.
(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)
[error] 42-42: 'ctx' is defined but never used.
(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)
[error] 43-43: 'ctx' is defined but never used.
(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)
apps/api/tests/hello.test.ts (1)
2-2: Verify route handler implementations.
Let's ensure the route handlers being tested are properly implemented:
✅ Verification successful
Route handlers exist but need implementation verification
The route handlers (GET, POST, PATCH, DELETE) are properly exported and defined in apps/api/app/api/[[...route]]/route.ts, but they all use the same handle(app) wrapper without apparent method-specific implementations. Let's verify if the routing logic is handled within the Hono app setup:
Route handlers are properly implemented
The imported route handlers (GET, POST, PATCH, DELETE) are correctly implemented in the hello.ts module using Hono's chained routing methods. The module provides:
- GET
/- Fetches all users - POST
/- Creates a new user - PATCH
/- Updates a user - DELETE
/- Deletes a user
These implementations match the handlers being tested in hello.test.ts.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify route handler implementations exist and match the test expectations
# Check if the route handlers exist
echo "Checking route handler implementations..."
rg -l "export.*\b(GET|POST|PATCH|DELETE)\b.*=.*async" "apps/api/app/api/[[...route]]"
# Check for proper error handling in route handlers
echo "Checking error handling in route handlers..."
rg "throw|catch|Error" "apps/api/app/api/[[...route]]"
Length of output: 336
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to locate the route handlers
# First, let's check if the directory structure is correct
fd "route.ts" apps/api
# Then search for exported handlers in any found route files
echo "Searching for route handlers..."
rg -A 2 "export.*(?:GET|POST|PATCH|DELETE)" apps/api
# Also check for any Next.js API route files
echo "Checking for Next.js API routes..."
fd "\[\[.*route\]\]" apps/api
Length of output: 407
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the actual implementation of the route handlers
echo "Checking route handler implementations..."
rg -B 2 -A 5 "(?:const|let|var)\s+(?:GET|POST|PATCH|DELETE)\s*=" apps/api/app/api/[[...route]]/route.ts
Length of output: 406
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the handle function implementation and app setup
echo "Checking handle function and app setup..."
rg -B 10 -A 2 "const\s+handle\s*=|const\s+app\s*=" apps/api/app/api/[[...route]]/route.ts
Length of output: 447
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for route definitions within the file
echo "Checking for Hono route definitions..."
rg -B 2 -A 5 "app\.(get|post|patch|delete)\(" apps/api/app/api/[[...route]]/route.ts
# Also check the imported hello module
echo "Checking hello module..."
cat apps/api/app/api/[[...route]]/hello.ts
Length of output: 1574
packages/database/prisma/schema.prisma (3)
35-36: Ensure referential integrity with onDelete: Cascade
In the Session model, the relation to the User model includes onDelete: Cascade. While this ensures that sessions are deleted when a user is removed, please verify that this behavior aligns with your application's requirements to prevent unintentional data loss.
Consider the potential impact of cascading deletes on related data. If necessary, adjust the onDelete policy accordingly.
46-46: Review onDelete: Cascade in the Account model
Similar to the Session model, the Account model uses onDelete: Cascade for its relation to User. Ensure that cascading deletes are appropriate for accounts associated with users, and that this won't result in unintended side effects.
Double-check the data relationships and confirm that cascading deletes won't compromise data integrity or violate business rules.
18-18:
Changing name from optional to required may cause issues
The name field has been changed from optional to required. This modification could lead to issues if existing User records have null values for name. Ensure that all existing records have non-null name values before applying this change to prevent runtime errors or migration failures.
Run the following script to identify User records with null name fields:
If any records are returned, consider updating them with a default name or handling them appropriately before proceeding.
apps/api/app/api/[[...route]]/route.ts (2)
17-22: Type definitions for Hono app variables look good.
The type definitions for user and session variables in the Hono app initialization are appropriate and enhance type safety.
24-34: CORS middleware configuration appears appropriate.
The setup of CORS middleware for /auth/** routes is correctly configured with the necessary options.
| @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ | |||
| import SignUp from "../../../components/custom/Sign-up"; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Fix import path and component naming inconsistency.
The import statement has two issues:
- The relative import path (
../../../) is fragile and could break if components are moved. - The component filename uses inconsistent casing ("Sign-up" instead of "SignUp").
Consider these improvements:
-import SignUp from "../../../components/custom/Sign-up";
+import { SignUp } from "@/components/auth/SignUp";Also, rename the component file from Sign-up.tsx to SignUp.tsx for consistency.
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ | |||
| import SignIn from "@/components/custom/Sign-In"; | |||
|
|
|||
| export default function page() { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Rename component to follow React naming convention.
React components should use PascalCase naming. Rename page to SignInPage to follow the convention.
-export default function page() {
+export default function SignInPage() {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export default function page() { | |
| export default function SignInPage() { |
| export const mailSchema = z.object({ | ||
| email: z.string().email(), | ||
| subject: z.string(), | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Schema definition needs additional fields and validation.
The current schema appears incomplete for a typical email sending use case:
- Missing essential fields like
message/contentfor the email body - Subject field lacks validation for empty strings or length constraints
- Consider exporting the inferred type for TypeScript usage
Consider applying these improvements:
export const mailSchema = z.object({
email: z.string().email(),
- subject: z.string(),
+ subject: z.string().min(1).max(200),
+ content: z.string().min(1),
});
+export type Mail = z.infer<typeof mailSchema>;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export const mailSchema = z.object({ | |
| email: z.string().email(), | |
| subject: z.string(), | |
| }); | |
| export const mailSchema = z.object({ | |
| email: z.string().email(), | |
| subject: z.string().min(1).max(200), | |
| content: z.string().min(1), | |
| }); | |
| export type Mail = z.infer<typeof mailSchema>; |
| export const mailBatchSchema = z.object({ | ||
| emails: z.array(z.string().email()), | ||
| subject: z.string(), | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add validation constraints for batch operations.
The batch schema needs additional safeguards:
- Missing content field for the email body
- No validation for subject
- No limit on the number of emails in a batch, which could lead to abuse
Apply these security-focused improvements:
export const mailBatchSchema = z.object({
- emails: z.array(z.string().email()),
+ emails: z.array(z.string().email()).min(1).max(100),
- subject: z.string(),
+ subject: z.string().min(1).max(200),
+ content: z.string().min(1),
});
+export type MailBatch = z.infer<typeof mailBatchSchema>;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export const mailBatchSchema = z.object({ | |
| emails: z.array(z.string().email()), | |
| subject: z.string(), | |
| }); | |
| export const mailBatchSchema = z.object({ | |
| emails: z.array(z.string().email()).min(1).max(100), | |
| subject: z.string().min(1).max(200), | |
| content: z.string().min(1), | |
| }); | |
| export type MailBatch = z.infer<typeof mailBatchSchema>; |
| import { z } from "zod"; | ||
|
|
||
| export const mailSchema = z.object({ | ||
| email: z.string().email(), | ||
| subject: z.string(), | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| export const mailBatchSchema = z.object({ | ||
| emails: z.array(z.string().email()), | ||
| subject: z.string(), | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Rate limiting implementation required for mail endpoints
The mail endpoints (/send and /send-batch) currently lack rate limiting protection. These endpoints need rate limiting to prevent potential abuse:
apps/api/app/api/[[...route]]/mail.ts: Add rate limiting middleware for both/sendand/send-batchroutes- The
/sendendpoint allows sending individual emails - The
/send-batchendpoint allows sending multiple emails in one request, making it particularly vulnerable to abuse
- The
Consider implementing rate limiting using Hono's middleware capabilities. You can:
- Use a rate limiting middleware package compatible with Hono
- Set appropriate limits per IP/user and time window
- Apply stricter limits for the batch endpoint
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify rate limiting implementation for email endpoints.
Since these schemas are used for email operations, ensure that proper rate limiting is implemented in the API endpoints to prevent abuse.
Let's check for rate limiting implementation:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for rate limiting middleware or implementation
# Expected: Find rate limiting configuration for mail endpoints
# Search for mail-related route definitions
rg -A 10 "mail\.(ts|js)" --glob "apps/api/**/*"
# Search for rate limiting middleware
rg -A 5 "(rateLimit|rateLimit|rate-limit)" --glob "apps/api/**/*"
Length of output: 117
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for email-related endpoints and rate limiting
# Search for email/mail related routes and endpoints
rg -i "(email|mail).*route" --glob "apps/**/*"
rg -i "app\.(post|get).*mail" -A 5 --glob "apps/**/*"
# Search for rate limiting with different variations and patterns
rg -i "limit.*request" --glob "apps/**/*"
rg -i "express.*rate" --glob "apps/**/*"
rg -i "@middleware.*rate" --glob "apps/**/*"
# Check for common rate limiting packages in package.json
find . -name "package.json" -exec grep -l "rate-limit\|ratelimit" {} \;
Length of output: 382
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any API routes or controllers that use these mail schemas
rg -i "import.*mail.*schema" -A 5 --glob "apps/**/*"
# Look for any middleware configurations in common locations
rg -i "middleware" -A 10 --glob "apps/**/server.{ts,js}"
rg -i "middleware" -A 10 --glob "apps/**/app.{ts,js}"
rg -i "middleware" -A 10 --glob "apps/**/index.{ts,js}"
# Check for security-related configurations
rg -i "security" -A 10 --glob "apps/**/*.{ts,js}"
Length of output: 936
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the mail route implementation since we found it
cat "apps/api/app/api/[[...route]]/mail.ts"
# Also check for any Hono middleware configurations
rg -i "middleware" -A 10 --glob "apps/api/**/*.{ts,js}"
rg -i "app\.use" -A 5 --glob "apps/api/**/*.{ts,js}"
Length of output: 2298
| app.use("*", async (c, next) => { | ||
| const session = await auth.api.getSession({ headers: c.req.raw.headers }); | ||
|
|
||
| if (!session) { | ||
| c.set("user", null); | ||
| c.set("session", null); | ||
| return next(); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| c.set("user", session.user); | ||
| c.set("session", session.session); | ||
| return next(); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling for getSession call.
The middleware currently does not handle potential errors from auth.api.getSession. If an error occurs, it could lead to unhandled exceptions. Consider wrapping the getSession call in a try-catch block to handle any errors gracefully.
Apply this diff to add error handling:
app.use("*", async (c, next) => {
+ try {
const session = await auth.api.getSession({ headers: c.req.raw.headers });
if (!session) {
c.set("user", null);
c.set("session", null);
return next();
}
c.set("user", session.user);
c.set("session", session.session);
return next();
+ } catch (error) {
+ c.set("user", null);
+ c.set("session", null);
+ return next();
+ }
});📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| app.use("*", async (c, next) => { | |
| const session = await auth.api.getSession({ headers: c.req.raw.headers }); | |
| if (!session) { | |
| c.set("user", null); | |
| c.set("session", null); | |
| return next(); | |
| } | |
| c.set("user", session.user); | |
| c.set("session", session.session); | |
| return next(); | |
| }); | |
| app.use("*", async (c, next) => { | |
| try { | |
| const session = await auth.api.getSession({ headers: c.req.raw.headers }); | |
| if (!session) { | |
| c.set("user", null); | |
| c.set("session", null); | |
| return next(); | |
| } | |
| c.set("user", session.user); | |
| c.set("session", session.session); | |
| return next(); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| c.set("user", null); | |
| c.set("session", null); | |
| return next(); | |
| } | |
| }); |
| app.options("/auth/**", (c) => { | ||
| const origin = c.req.raw.headers.get("origin") ?? ""; | ||
|
|
||
| if (allowedOrigins.includes(origin)) { | ||
| return new Response(null, { | ||
| status: 204, | ||
| headers: { | ||
| "Access-Control-Allow-Origin": origin, | ||
| "Access-Control-Allow-Methods": "GET, POST, OPTIONS", | ||
| "Access-Control-Allow-Headers": "Content-Type, Authorization", | ||
| "Access-Control-Allow-Credentials": "true", | ||
| "Access-Control-Max-Age": "600", | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return new Response("Forbidden", { | ||
| status: 403, | ||
| }); | ||
| }) | ||
| .delete( async(c) => { | ||
| const test = await prisma.user.delete({ | ||
| where: { | ||
| id: "2", | ||
| } | ||
| }) | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Remove redundant OPTIONS handler as CORS middleware is already configured
The codebase shows that the Hono CORS middleware is properly configured for /auth/** routes with the same settings that are being manually handled:
- Both use the same
allowedOrigins - Same headers (
Content-Type,Authorization) - Same methods (
POST,GET,OPTIONS) - Same max age (600)
The manual OPTIONS handler is redundant and should be removed since the CORS middleware already handles preflight requests with identical configuration.
🔗 Analysis chain
Review necessity of manual OPTIONS handler alongside CORS middleware.
You have implemented a manual handler for OPTIONS requests on /auth/** routes. Since the cors middleware is already in place, this manual handling might be redundant. Verify if this is necessary; otherwise, consider relying on the middleware to handle preflight OPTIONS requests.
Run the following script to check if the cors middleware handles OPTIONS requests:
This script sends an OPTIONS request to an /auth/** route to verify if the CORS middleware handles it appropriately without the manual handler.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if CORS middleware handles OPTIONS requests for /auth/** routes
# Test: Send an OPTIONS request and check if the response headers are correctly set.
curl -X OPTIONS -I http://localhost:3000/api/auth/test-endpoint
Length of output: 472
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's analyze the codebase to understand the CORS setup
# Find CORS middleware configuration
rg -l "cors" --type ts
# Look for CORS-related imports and middleware setup
rg "cors|middleware" --type ts -A 5 -B 5
# Find any other OPTIONS handlers in the codebase
ast-grep --pattern 'app.options($$$)'
Length of output: 2888
| const itemContext = React.useContext(FormItemContext); | ||
| const { getFieldState, formState } = useFormContext(); | ||
|
|
||
| const fieldState = getFieldState(fieldContext.name, formState); | ||
|
|
||
| if (!fieldContext) { | ||
| throw new Error("useFormField should be used within <FormField>"); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const { id } = itemContext; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add null check for itemContext before accessing id
itemContext may be undefined if useFormField is used outside of a FormItem. Accessing itemContext.id without verifying could cause a runtime error. Add a null check for itemContext before using it.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
+ if (!itemContext) {
+ throw new Error("useFormField should be used within a <FormItem>");
+ }
const { id } = itemContext;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const itemContext = React.useContext(FormItemContext); | |
| const { getFieldState, formState } = useFormContext(); | |
| const fieldState = getFieldState(fieldContext.name, formState); | |
| if (!fieldContext) { | |
| throw new Error("useFormField should be used within <FormField>"); | |
| } | |
| const { id } = itemContext; | |
| const itemContext = React.useContext(FormItemContext); | |
| const { getFieldState, formState } = useFormContext(); | |
| const fieldState = getFieldState(fieldContext.name, formState); | |
| if (!fieldContext) { | |
| throw new Error("useFormField should be used within <FormField>"); | |
| } | |
| if (!itemContext) { | |
| throw new Error("useFormField should be used within a <FormItem>"); | |
| } | |
| const { id } = itemContext; |
| const FormLabel = React.forwardRef< | ||
| React.ElementRef<typeof LabelPrimitive.Root>, | ||
| React.ComponentPropsWithoutRef<typeof LabelPrimitive.Root> | ||
| >(({ className, ...props }, ref) => { | ||
| const { error, formItemId } = useFormField(); | ||
|
|
||
| return ( | ||
| <Label | ||
| ref={ref} | ||
| className={cn(error && "text-destructive", className)} | ||
| htmlFor={formItemId} | ||
| {...props} | ||
| /> | ||
| ); | ||
| }); | ||
| FormLabel.displayName = "FormLabel"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Align type definitions with the rendered Label component in FormLabel
In FormLabel, the types are based on LabelPrimitive.Root, but the rendered component is Label from @/components/ui/label. To prevent potential type mismatches, update the type definitions to match the Label component.
Apply this diff to adjust the types:
const FormLabel = React.forwardRef<
- React.ElementRef<typeof LabelPrimitive.Root>,
- React.ComponentPropsWithoutRef<typeof LabelPrimitive.Root>
+ React.ElementRef<typeof Label>,
+ React.ComponentPropsWithoutRef<typeof Label>
>(({ className, ...props }, ref) => {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const FormLabel = React.forwardRef< | |
| React.ElementRef<typeof LabelPrimitive.Root>, | |
| React.ComponentPropsWithoutRef<typeof LabelPrimitive.Root> | |
| >(({ className, ...props }, ref) => { | |
| const { error, formItemId } = useFormField(); | |
| return ( | |
| <Label | |
| ref={ref} | |
| className={cn(error && "text-destructive", className)} | |
| htmlFor={formItemId} | |
| {...props} | |
| /> | |
| ); | |
| }); | |
| FormLabel.displayName = "FormLabel"; | |
| const FormLabel = React.forwardRef< | |
| React.ElementRef<typeof Label>, | |
| React.ComponentPropsWithoutRef<typeof Label> | |
| >(({ className, ...props }, ref) => { | |
| const { error, formItemId } = useFormField(); | |
| return ( | |
| <Label | |
| ref={ref} | |
| className={cn(error && "text-destructive", className)} | |
| htmlFor={formItemId} | |
| {...props} | |
| /> | |
| ); | |
| }); | |
| FormLabel.displayName = "FormLabel"; |
| const useFormField = () => { | ||
| const fieldContext = React.useContext(FormFieldContext); | ||
| const itemContext = React.useContext(FormItemContext); | ||
| const { getFieldState, formState } = useFormContext(); | ||
|
|
||
| const fieldState = getFieldState(fieldContext.name, formState); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix the order of null check for fieldContext in useFormField
Currently, fieldContext is accessed before checking if it's defined, which may lead to a runtime error if useFormField is used outside of FormField. Move the null check for fieldContext before using fieldContext.name.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
+ if (!fieldContext) {
+ throw new Error("useFormField should be used within <FormField>");
+ }
const { getFieldState, formState } = useFormContext();
- const fieldState = getFieldState(fieldContext.name, formState);
+ const fieldState = getFieldState(fieldContext.name, formState);Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
wtfdivyansh
force-pushed
the
feature/auth
branch
from
e120b6c
to
96e1247
Compare
|
@wtfdivyansh is attempting to deploy a commit to the BlueFinZ Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apps/www/components/custom/account-switcher.tsx (1)
1-29: Consider adding session validation and memoization.To improve reliability and performance:
- Validate session array is not empty
- Memoize the mapped options to prevent unnecessary re-renders
+ import { useMemo } from 'react'; export default function AccountSwitcher({session, activeSession}: Props) { const router = useRouter(); + if (!session?.length) { + return null; + } + const sessionOptions = useMemo(() => + session.map((item) => ( + <option key={item.session.id} value={item.session.id}> + {item.user.name} + </option> + )), + [session] + ); // ... rest of the component return ( // ... in the select element - {session.map((item)=> ...)} + {sessionOptions} ); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
apps/api/package.json(1 hunks)apps/app/package.json(0 hunks)apps/www/components/custom/account-switcher.tsx(1 hunks)package.json(3 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- apps/app/package.json
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- apps/api/package.json
- package.json
🔇 Additional comments (3)
apps/www/components/custom/account-switcher.tsx (3)
1-8: LGTM: Imports and type definitions are well structured.
The component properly defines its dependencies and type interface.
11-19:
Add error handling and loading state management.
The async operation needs proper error handling and loading state indication.
The previous review comment about error handling is still valid. Additionally:
- Remove console.log statements
- Add proper error typing for the authClient response
+ const [isLoading, setIsLoading] = useState(false);
const onSelect = async (sessionId: string) => {
+ try {
+ setIsLoading(true);
- console.log(sessionId)
const active = await authClient.multiSession.setActive({
sessionId: sessionId,
});
- console.log(active)
router.refresh();
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error('Failed to switch session:', error);
+ // Add your preferred toast/notification here
+ } finally {
+ setIsLoading(false);
+ }
};21-27:
Enhance accessibility and user experience.
The select element needs accessibility improvements and proper loading state indication.
The previous review comment about accessibility is still valid. Additionally:
- Fix the border opacity syntax
- Remove trailing whitespace in option text
- Add proper ARIA labels
- <div className="flex items-center justify-center gap-2 p-4">
+ <div className="flex items-center justify-center gap-2 p-4" role="region" aria-label="Account Selection">
<select
onChange={(e)=>onSelect(e.target.value)}
value={activeSession.session.id}
- className="border-2 border-gray-300[0.3] rounded-md p-2"
+ className="border-2 border-gray-300/30 rounded-md p-2"
+ disabled={isLoading}
+ aria-label="Switch active account"
>
{session.map((item)=>{
- return <option key={item.session.id} value={item.session.id}>{item.user.name} </option>
+ return <option key={item.session.id} value={item.session.id}>{item.user.name}</option>
})}
</select>
+ {isLoading && <span className="loading-spinner" aria-hidden="true" />}
</div>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
apps/www/lib/auth-client.ts (1)
8-11: Add type safety and error handling for baseURL configuration.While the auth client setup is functional, consider adding validation for the baseURL and error handling for configuration issues.
Consider this enhancement:
+const isValidUrl = (url: string) => { + try { + new URL(url); + return true; + } catch { + return false; + } +}; + +if (!isValidUrl(BaseDomain)) { + throw new Error(`Invalid baseURL: ${BaseDomain}`); +} + export const authClient = createAuthClient({ baseURL: BaseDomain, plugins: [multiSessionClient()], });apps/www/components/custom/Sign-In.tsx (2)
59-59: Update placeholder text for input fields.The current placeholder "shadcn" is inappropriate for both email and password fields. Consider using more descriptive placeholders.
-<Input placeholder="shadcn" {...field} /> +<Input placeholder="Enter your email" {...field} /> -<Input placeholder="shadcn" type="password" {...field} /> +<Input placeholder="Enter your password" type="password" {...field} />Also applies to: 72-72
78-78: Add loading state to submit button.The submit button should indicate when the form is being processed to improve user experience.
-<Button type="submit">Submit</Button> +<Button type="submit" disabled={form.formState.isSubmitting}> + {form.formState.isSubmitting ? "Signing in..." : "Sign in"} +</Button>apps/api/app/api/[[...route]]/route.ts (1)
9-13: Consider using environment variables for allowed origins.The hardcoded allowed origins list should ideally be configured based on the environment to maintain flexibility across different deployments.
-const allowedOrigins = [ - "http://localhost:3003", - "https://www.plura.pro", - "http://app.plura.pro", -]; +const allowedOrigins = process.env.ALLOWED_ORIGINS?.split(',') ?? [ + "http://localhost:3003", + "https://www.plura.pro", + "http://app.plura.pro", +];apps/www/components/custom/Sign-up.tsx (3)
8-17: Remove unused import.The
FormDescriptioncomponent is imported but never used in the code.import { Form, FormControl, - FormDescription, FormField, FormItem, FormLabel, FormMessage, } from "@/components/ui/form";🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 11-11: 'FormDescription' is defined but never used.
(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)
61-61: Update placeholder text to be more descriptive.The current placeholder "shadcn" appears to be boilerplate text. Consider using more meaningful placeholders that guide users.
- <Input placeholder="shadcn" {...field} /> + <Input placeholder="Enter your full name" {...field} /> - <Input placeholder="shadcn" {...field} /> + <Input placeholder="Enter your email address" {...field} /> - <Input placeholder="shadcn" type="password" {...field} /> + <Input placeholder="Enter your password" type="password" {...field} />Also applies to: 74-74, 87-87
51-96: Consider adding loading state to the submit button.The form submission is asynchronous, but there's no indication to the user that the submission is in progress.
- <Button type="submit">Submit</Button> + <Button type="submit" disabled={form.formState.isSubmitting}> + {form.formState.isSubmitting ? "Signing up..." : "Sign up"} + </Button>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (13)
apps/api/app/api/[[...route]]/hello.ts(1 hunks)apps/api/app/api/[[...route]]/mail.ts(1 hunks)apps/api/app/api/[[...route]]/route.ts(1 hunks)apps/www/app/(auth)/dashboard/page.tsx(1 hunks)apps/www/app/(auth)/sign-in/page.tsx(1 hunks)apps/www/app/(auth)/sign-up/page.tsx(1 hunks)apps/www/components/custom/Sign-In.tsx(1 hunks)apps/www/components/custom/Sign-up.tsx(1 hunks)apps/www/components/custom/account-switcher.tsx(1 hunks)apps/www/components/ui/form.tsx(1 hunks)apps/www/components/ui/label.tsx(1 hunks)apps/www/lib/auth-client.ts(1 hunks)apps/www/lib/server.ts(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (8)
- apps/api/app/api/[[...route]]/hello.ts
- apps/api/app/api/[[...route]]/mail.ts
- apps/www/app/(auth)/dashboard/page.tsx
- apps/www/app/(auth)/sign-in/page.tsx
- apps/www/app/(auth)/sign-up/page.tsx
- apps/www/components/custom/account-switcher.tsx
- apps/www/components/ui/label.tsx
- apps/www/lib/server.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 eslint
apps/www/components/custom/Sign-In.tsx
[error] 33-33: 'data' is assigned a value but never used.
(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)
[error] 33-33: 'error' is assigned a value but never used.
(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)
[error] 40-40: 'ctx' is defined but never used.
(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)
[error] 41-41: 'ctx' is defined but never used.
(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)
apps/www/components/custom/Sign-up.tsx
[error] 11-11: 'FormDescription' is defined but never used.
(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)
[error] 35-35: 'data' is assigned a value but never used.
(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)
[error] 35-35: 'error' is assigned a value but never used.
(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)
[error] 42-42: 'ctx' is defined but never used.
(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)
[error] 43-43: 'ctx' is defined but never used.
(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)
apps/www/lib/auth-client.ts
[error] 3-3: 'Http2ServerRequest' is defined but never used.
(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)
🔇 Additional comments (17)
apps/www/lib/auth-client.ts (2)
13-13: LGTM! Clean and comprehensive auth method exports.
The exported methods cover all essential authentication functionality: sign-in, sign-up, session management, and multi-session support.
4-7: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance security and configurability using environment variables.
The hardcoded API URLs should be moved to environment variables for better security and environment management.
Apply this change:
-const BaseDomain =
- process.env.NODE_ENV === "production"
- ? "https://api.plura.pro"
- : "http://localhost:3001";
+const BaseDomain = process.env.API_BASE_URL ?? (
+ process.env.NODE_ENV === "production"
+ ? "https://api.plura.pro"
+ : "http://localhost:3001"
+);Likely invalid or redundant comment.
apps/www/components/custom/Sign-In.tsx (3)
19-22: Password validation needs enhancement.
A previous review already suggested improving the password validation requirements. That suggestion is still valid and should be implemented.
24-31: LGTM! Form initialization follows best practices.
The form setup is well-implemented with proper type safety and default values.
32-47:
Form submission handling needs improvement.
A previous review already suggested comprehensive improvements for the form submission handling. That suggestion is still valid and should be implemented.
Additionally, the current implementation has several critical issues:
- Unused destructured variables
dataanderror - Empty callback handlers with unused
ctxparameters - No proper error handling beyond basic alerts
- No loading states during submission
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 33-33: 'data' is assigned a value but never used.
(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)
[error] 33-33: 'error' is assigned a value but never used.
(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)
[error] 40-40: 'ctx' is defined but never used.
(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)
[error] 41-41: 'ctx' is defined but never used.
(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)
apps/api/app/api/[[...route]]/route.ts (6)
17-22: LGTM! Well-typed Hono app setup.
The type definitions for user and session variables provide good type safety, and the base path configuration is appropriate.
35-54: Remove redundant OPTIONS handler.
The manual OPTIONS handler is redundant as the CORS middleware already handles preflight requests with identical configuration.
55-67: Add error handling for getSession call.
The middleware still needs error handling for the auth.api.getSession call to prevent unhandled exceptions.
75-85: Correct response method for unauthorized access.
The method c.body(null, 401) should be replaced with c.text() or c.json().
92-97: Add error handling for listDeviceSessions call.
The endpoint needs error handling for the auth.api.listDeviceSessions call.
Line range hint 102-105: LGTM! Consistent exports configuration.
The exports are properly configured, including the new OPTIONS export for CORS support.
apps/www/components/custom/Sign-up.tsx (1)
34-49: Verify CSRF protection for the sign-up endpoint.
Since this form handles sensitive data, ensure that proper CSRF protection is in place for the authentication endpoints.
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 35-35: 'data' is assigned a value but never used.
(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)
[error] 35-35: 'error' is assigned a value but never used.
(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)
[error] 42-42: 'ctx' is defined but never used.
(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)
[error] 43-43: 'ctx' is defined but never used.
(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)
apps/www/components/ui/form.tsx (5)
1-18: LGTM! Clean imports and setup.
The imports are well-organized, and the client directive is correctly placed. The Form alias to FormProvider enhances readability.
106-167: LGTM! Well-implemented accessibility features.
The FormControl and FormMessage components handle accessibility attributes properly:
- Appropriate ARIA attributes for form controls
- Error states are correctly managed
- Screen reader support through descriptive IDs
170-179: LGTM! Clean exports and well-structured components.
The exports are well-organized, and the component structure follows best practices for form management with react-hook-form.
44-65:
Fix the order of null checks in useFormField.
The null check for fieldContext should be before accessing its properties, and itemContext should be checked before accessing id.
Apply this diff to fix both issues:
const useFormField = () => {
const fieldContext = React.useContext(FormFieldContext);
const itemContext = React.useContext(FormItemContext);
- const { getFieldState, formState } = useFormContext();
-
- const fieldState = getFieldState(fieldContext.name, formState);
-
if (!fieldContext) {
throw new Error("useFormField should be used within <FormField>");
}
+ if (!itemContext) {
+ throw new Error("useFormField should be used within <FormItem>");
+ }
+
+ const { getFieldState, formState } = useFormContext();
+ const fieldState = getFieldState(fieldContext.name, formState);
- const { id } = itemContext;
+ const { id } = itemContext;
return {
id,
name: fieldContext.name,
formItemId: `${id}-form-item`,
formDescriptionId: `${id}-form-item-description`,
formMessageId: `${id}-form-item-message`,
...fieldState,
};
};89-104: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Update FormLabel type definitions.
The component uses Label but types are from LabelPrimitive.Root.
Apply this diff to fix the type definitions:
const FormLabel = React.forwardRef<
- React.ElementRef<typeof LabelPrimitive.Root>,
- React.ComponentPropsWithoutRef<typeof LabelPrimitive.Root>
+ React.ElementRef<typeof Label>,
+ React.ComponentPropsWithoutRef<typeof Label>
>(({ className, ...props }, ref) => {| defaultValues: { | ||
| email: "", | ||
| password: "", | ||
| }, | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add missing defaultValue for name field.
The form's defaultValues is missing the 'name' field while it's included in the schema.
defaultValues: {
+ name: "",
email: "",
password: "",
},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| defaultValues: { | |
| email: "", | |
| password: "", | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| defaultValues: { | |
| name: "", | |
| email: "", | |
| password: "", | |
| }, | |
| }); |
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores