fix error and lint #37
Conversation
|
Deployment failed with the following error: |
|
@wtfdivyansh is attempting to deploy a commit to the BlueFinZ Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to several configuration and component files within a Next.js application. Key changes include the addition of ESLint and TypeScript settings in Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ For the very first time we hit the vercel deployment limit. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
apps/www/components/custom/signInComponent.tsx (2)
Line range hint
33-37: Add error handling for sign-in failures.The current implementation doesn't handle potential authentication errors, which could lead to a poor user experience when sign-in fails.
Consider implementing error handling:
const onSubmit = async (SignInData: z.infer<typeof formSchema>) => { + try { await authClient.signIn.email({ email: SignInData.email, password: SignInData.password, callbackURL: "/dashboard", }); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Sign-in failed:', error); + // Handle error appropriately (e.g., show error message to user) + } };
Line range hint
33-37: Consider adding loading state for better UX.The sign-in process might take a few seconds, but there's no indication to the user that the request is in progress.
Consider adding a loading state:
const onSubmit = async (SignInData: z.infer<typeof formSchema>) => { + const [isLoading, setIsLoading] = useState(false); try { + setIsLoading(true); await authClient.signIn.email({ email: SignInData.email, password: SignInData.password, callbackURL: "/dashboard", }); } catch (error) { console.error('Sign-in failed:', error); + } finally { + setIsLoading(false); } };Then update the submit button:
- <Button type="submit">Submit</Button> + <Button type="submit" disabled={isLoading}> + {isLoading ? "Signing in..." : "Submit"} + </Button>apps/www/components/custom/signUpComponent.tsx (3)
Line range hint
51-51: Update placeholder text to be more descriptive.The placeholder text "shadcn" appears to be a development artifact and should be replaced with more meaningful placeholders for better user experience.
- <Input placeholder="shadcn" {...field} /> + <Input placeholder="Enter your name" {...field} /> - <Input placeholder="shadcn" {...field} /> + <Input placeholder="Enter your email" {...field} /> - <Input placeholder="shadcn" type="password" {...field} /> + <Input placeholder="Enter your password" type="password" {...field} />Also applies to: 61-61, 71-71
Line range hint
34-39: Add error handling and loading state.The current implementation lacks error handling and user feedback during form submission. This could lead to a poor user experience when errors occur.
Consider implementing proper error handling and loading state:
const form = useForm<z.infer<typeof formSchema>>({ resolver: zodResolver(formSchema), defaultValues: { name: "", email: "", password: "", }, }); + const [isLoading, setIsLoading] = useState(false); const onSubmit = async (SignInData: z.infer<typeof formSchema>) => { + setIsLoading(true); try { await authClient.signUp.email({ name: SignInData.name, email: SignInData.email, password: SignInData.password, }); + // Handle successful signup (e.g., redirect or show success message) + } catch (error) { + // Show error message to user + console.error('Signup failed:', error); + form.setError('root', { + type: 'manual', + message: 'Failed to create account. Please try again.' + }); + } finally { + setIsLoading(false); + } };Then update the submit button:
- <Button type="submit">Submit</Button> + <Button type="submit" disabled={isLoading}> + {isLoading ? "Creating account..." : "Sign Up"} + </Button>
Line range hint
17-21: Enhance password validation rules.The current password validation only checks for minimum length. Consider implementing stronger password requirements for better security.
const formSchema = z.object({ name: z.string(), email: z.string().email(), - password: z.string().min(8), + password: z.string() + .min(8, "Password must be at least 8 characters") + .max(100, "Password is too long") + .regex( + /^(?=.*[a-z])(?=.*[A-Z])(?=.*\d)(?=.*[@$!%*?&])[A-Za-z\d@$!%*?&]+$/, + "Password must contain at least one uppercase letter, one lowercase letter, one number, and one special character" + ), });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
apps/api/next.config.js(1 hunks)apps/app/next.config.ts(1 hunks)apps/www/components/custom/signInComponent.tsx(1 hunks)apps/www/components/custom/signUpComponent.tsx(1 hunks)apps/www/lib/auth-client.ts(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- apps/www/lib/auth-client.ts
🔇 Additional comments (4)
apps/app/next.config.ts (1)
4-4: LGTM: Enabling Strict Mode
Enabling reactStrictMode is a good practice as it helps identify potential problems in the application by:
- Double-invoking functions to help spot side effects
- Warning about legacy/unsafe lifecycle methods
- Detecting unexpected side effects
apps/www/components/custom/signInComponent.tsx (1)
Line range hint 33-37: Verify callback URL handling.
The code uses a hardcoded callback URL. Let's verify that the dashboard route exists and is properly protected.
apps/www/components/custom/signUpComponent.tsx (2)
29-31: LGTM: Form field initialization is complete.
The addition of default values for all form fields is a good practice to ensure consistent form state initialization.
Line range hint 34-39: Verify CSRF protection for the authentication endpoint.
Since this is an authentication form, ensure that the authClient.signUp.email endpoint has proper CSRF protection implemented.
| eslint:{ | ||
| ignoreDuringBuilds: true | ||
| }, | ||
| typescript: { | ||
| ignoreBuildErrors: true, | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
While this change allows the build to complete, it bypasses important safety checks that help prevent bugs and maintain code quality. This is particularly concerning for an API service where type safety and code correctness are crucial.
Instead of ignoring these errors, we should:
- Address the underlying ESLint and TypeScript issues
- Keep the error checks enabled to catch problems early
- Consider using more specific ignore patterns if absolutely necessary
Would you like assistance in:
- Identifying and fixing the specific ESLint/TypeScript errors?
- Setting up more granular ignore patterns?
💡 Codebase verification
Disabling TypeScript and ESLint checks during builds is not recommended
Based on the analysis of the codebase:
- All TypeScript configurations show
strict: true, indicating proper type checking is intended - No widespread type or linting issues are found in the git history
- No documented known issues that would justify bypassing these checks
- The codebase appears to be a standard Next.js setup with proper TypeScript integration
Disabling these checks during builds removes critical safeguards that help maintain code quality and catch potential runtime errors early. Instead:
- Address any type errors properly to maintain type safety
- Fix ESLint violations to ensure code quality standards
- If there are specific cases requiring exceptions, use targeted ignores rather than disabling checks globally
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the nature of build errors being bypassed
Let's understand what specific errors this change is attempting to work around.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Analyze TypeScript and ESLint errors in the codebase
echo "Checking for TypeScript type errors..."
# Look for type annotations and potential type issues
rg -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" "any|unknown" -C 2
echo "\nChecking for common ESLint rule violations..."
# Look for common ESLint disable directives that might indicate problematic areas
rg "eslint-disable|@ts-ignore|@ts-nocheck" -C 2
echo "\nChecking for TODO/FIXME comments that might relate to type issues..."
rg "TODO|FIXME|HACK" -C 2 -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx"
Length of output: 2018
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any existing type errors in the TypeScript configuration and build logs
# Check TypeScript configuration
echo "TypeScript Configuration:"
fd tsconfig.json --exec cat {}
# Check for any error patterns in recent git history
echo -e "\nRecent commits mentioning type or lint errors:"
git log -S "type error" -S "lint error" -S "build error" --pretty=format:"%h %s" -n 10
# Look for error handling patterns
echo -e "\nError handling patterns in TypeScript files:"
rg "throw|catch|Error" -t ts -t tsx -C 2
# Check for any existing error documentation
echo -e "\nChecking documentation for known issues:"
fd "README|CONTRIBUTING" --exec cat {}
Length of output: 8873
| const nextConfig = { | ||
| reactStrictMode: true, | ||
| eslint: { | ||
| ignoreDuringBuilds: true, | ||
| }, | ||
| typescript: { | ||
| ignoreBuildErrors: true, | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
While this configuration will allow the build to succeed, it's masking potential issues rather than fixing them. Disabling type checking and linting can lead to:
- Runtime errors that could have been caught during build
- Decreased code quality
- Hidden bugs that become harder to track down
Instead of ignoring errors, I recommend:
- Address TypeScript errors properly
- Fix ESLint violations
- If temporary, add a TODO comment with a timeline for proper fixes
Would you like help identifying and fixing the underlying TypeScript and ESLint errors?
| @@ -1,7 +1,13 @@ | |||
| import type { NextConfig } from "next"; | |||
|
|
|||
| const nextConfig: NextConfig = { | |||
| /* config options here */ | |||
| const nextConfig = { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Restore the NextConfig type annotation
The removal of the type annotation reduces type safety. While the config will still work, we lose valuable type checking for the configuration object.
-const nextConfig = {
+const nextConfig: NextConfig = {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const nextConfig = { | |
| const nextConfig: NextConfig = { |
| eslint: { | ||
| ignoreDuringBuilds: true, | ||
| }, | ||
| typescript: { | ||
| ignoreBuildErrors: true, | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Disable build-time type checking and linting with caution
Based on the analysis of the TypeScript configurations and Next.js configs, this appears to be a monorepo setup with strict TypeScript configurations enabled. However, disabling both type checking and linting during builds across multiple Next.js applications suggests a broader issue that needs addressing:
- Multiple
next.configfiles are consistently disabling both TypeScript and ESLint checks during builds - The repository has proper TypeScript configurations with
strict: trueand other type-safety features enabled - The pattern of disabling checks appears systematic rather than temporary
Consider these alternatives:
- Enable incremental builds to improve build performance without sacrificing type safety
- Use TypeScript project references for better build caching
- If specific errors need suppression, handle them individually rather than globally disabling all checks
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the nature and scope of build errors
Let's understand what errors are being suppressed to provide targeted solutions.
Consider implementing a more sustainable solution:
- Set up proper TypeScript configurations in
tsconfig.json - Configure ESLint rules appropriately in
.eslintrc - Add pre-commit hooks to catch issues early
- Consider CI/CD pipeline integration for automated checks
Let me try a different approach to gather information about potential build issues.
Let me try one more search to find potential type and lint issues using a different approach.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Identify TypeScript and ESLint errors that are being suppressed
# Check for TypeScript errors
echo "TypeScript Errors:"
npx tsc --noEmit 2>&1 || true
# Check for ESLint errors
echo -e "\nESLint Errors:"
npx next lint 2>&1 || true
Length of output: 283
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for TypeScript configuration and potential type issues
echo "TypeScript Configuration:"
fd tsconfig.json --exec cat {}
echo -e "\nPotential Type Issues:"
# Look for type-related comments or suppressions
rg -i "(@ts-ignore|@ts-nocheck|any|TODO.*type|FIXME.*type)" --type ts --type tsx -A 2
echo -e "\nESLint Configuration:"
fd ".eslintrc" --exec cat {}
echo -e "\nLint Disable Comments:"
# Look for eslint disable comments
rg -i "(eslint-disable|eslint-ignore)" --type ts --type tsx -A 2
Length of output: 3307
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for potential type and lint issues in all files
echo "Searching for type and lint issues:"
rg -t js -t typescript "(@ts-ignore|@ts-nocheck|any|TODO|FIXME|eslint-disable)" -C 2
echo -e "\nChecking for error handling patterns:"
rg -t js -t typescript "(try|catch|throw|Error)" -C 2
echo -e "\nChecking Next.js build output patterns:"
fd "next.config" --exec cat {}
Length of output: 1167
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements
Bug Fixes