No frames3 #351
Merged
No frames3 #351
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
alternative to #349
That PR would not allow a merge for some weird reason and the spalloc_server test hung
the transceiver code was designed to allow a different BMP per frame and cabinet.
This was however never used. In Frame and cabinet where always 0
This pr removes that.
So a Transceiver now has a single bmp connection and therefor a single bmp conncetion selector
Must be done at the same time as:
SpiNNakerManchester/SpiNNFrontEndCommon#1097
SpiNNakerManchester/spalloc_server#90
tested by:
SpiNNakerManchester/IntegrationTests#222