Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Bug]: Offset render of items/blocks in Chemical Painter #395

Open
1 task done
LolscopeDev2022 opened this issue Sep 15, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
1 task done

[Bug]: Offset render of items/blocks in Chemical Painter #395

LolscopeDev2022 opened this issue Sep 15, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
Bug A feature of the mod doesn't work properly, causes a crash, etc.

Comments

@LolscopeDev2022
Copy link
Collaborator

Initial Check

  • I have checked the existing issues and this one is not a duplicate

Category

🧊Rendering

Description

EWTS. During the item/block painting, the "colored" item/block's rotation is a bit offset from the "uncolored" item/block.
image

Side

Client

Reproduction

  1. Form Chemical Painter multiblock
  2. Fill it with ink, charge it electricity
  3. Give it an item/block to paint
  4. Observe the process closely

Expected Behaviour

The "colored" part of the item/block should be exactly aligned with "uncolored" part

Logs

No response

Other Evidence

Also sometimes during painting there are missing particles from ink spraying

Operating System

Linux

Minecraft Version

1.12.2

Immersive Intelligence Version

0.3.1-dev2

Immersive Engineering Version

0.98

@fastdelaspeed
Copy link
Contributor

To devs and other bug hunters: I investigated this bug and it appears to be directly correlated with viewing angle. When looking at the painted block head on from a cardinal direction, no offset is observed. However, at an intercardinal, the issue is extreme.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bug A feature of the mod doesn't work properly, causes a crash, etc.
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants