Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consolidate gamma #9769

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 6, 2023
Merged

Conversation

fxdup
Copy link
Contributor

@fxdup fxdup commented Oct 5, 2023

Describe your change:

Consolidation of gamma and gamma_recursive into one file
Fixes #8098

  • Add an algorithm?
  • Fix a bug or typo in an existing algorithm?
  • Documentation change?
  • Merge two different implementations into one file

Checklist:

  • I have read CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • This pull request is all my own work -- I have not plagiarized.
  • I know that pull requests will not be merged if they fail the automated tests.
  • This PR only changes one algorithm file. To ease review, please open separate PRs for separate algorithms.
  • All new Python files are placed inside an existing directory.
  • All filenames are in all lowercase characters with no spaces or dashes.
  • All functions and variable names follow Python naming conventions.
  • All function parameters and return values are annotated with Python type hints.
  • All functions have doctests that pass the automated testing.
  • All new algorithms include at least one URL that points to Wikipedia or another similar explanation.
  • If this pull request resolves one or more open issues then the description above includes the issue number(s) with a closing keyword: "Fixes #ISSUE-NUMBER".

@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot added enhancement This PR modified some existing files awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed labels Oct 5, 2023
maths/gamma.py Outdated
Comment on lines 104 to 110
def test_gamma_recursive() -> None:
"""
>>> test_gamma_recursive()
"""
assert gamma_recursive(0.5) == math.sqrt(math.pi)
assert gamma_recursive(1) == 1.0
assert gamma_recursive(2) == 1.0
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we get rid of this function by adding its tests to the gamma_recursive doctests?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, I just realized that 108 and 110 are already tested in the doctests

maths/gamma.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@tianyizheng02 tianyizheng02 merged commit 995c553 into TheAlgorithms:master Oct 6, 2023
3 checks passed
@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot removed the awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed label Oct 6, 2023
sedatguzelsemme pushed a commit to sedatguzelsemme/Python that referenced this pull request Sep 15, 2024
* refactor(gamma): Append _iterative to func name

* refactor(gamma): Consolidate implementations

* refactor(gamma): Redundant test function removal

* Update maths/gamma.py

---------

Co-authored-by: Tianyi Zheng <tianyizheng02@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement This PR modified some existing files
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Concatenate/consolidate all algorithms with different implementations
2 participants