-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 745
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use IRBuilder in the binary parser #6963
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
In preparation for using IRBuilder in the binary parser, eagerly create Functions when parsing the function section so that they are already created once we parse the code section. IRBuilder will require the functions to exist when parsing calls so it can figure out what type each call should have, even when there is a call to a function whose body has not been parsed yet. NFC except that some error messages change to include the new empty functions.
The purpose of the datacount section is to pre-declare how many data segments there will be so that engines can allocate space for them and not have to back patch subsequent instructions in the code section that refer to them. Once we use IRBuilder in the binary parser, we will have to have the data segments available by the time we parse instructions that use them, so eagerly construct the data segments when parsing the datacount section.
The binary parser generally does not know the final names of module elements when it parses them, or even when it parses instructions that refer to them, since the name section comes at the end of a binary. The parser previously kept a list of pointers to locations where each module element's name would have to be used, then it patched those locations after parsing the names section to discover the final names. When the binary parser starts using IRBuilder, the parsed expressions will be constructed and managed by IRBuilder rather than by the parser itself. This means that the parser will no longer be able to collect pointers to places where module element names are used; it won't have access to the instructions at all. Since the strategy of collecting locations to patch will no longer work, switch to a strategy of traversing the module to find and update names instead. This is generally less efficient because the locations have to be found before they can be updated, but on the other hand it only happens when preserving debug info and it is parallelizable anyway.
IRBuilder is a utility for turning arbitrary valid streams of Wasm instructions into valid Binaryen IR. It is already used in the text parser, so now use it in the binary parser as well. Since the IRBuilder API for building each intruction requires only the information that the binary and text formats include as immediates to that instruction, the parser is now much simpler than before. In particular, it does not need to manage a stack of instructions to figure out what the children of each expression should be; IRBuilder handles this instead. There are some differences between the IR constructed by IRBuilder and the IR the binary parser constructed before this change. Most importantly, IRBuilder generates better multivalue code because it avoids eagerly breaking up multivalue results into individual components that might need to be immediately reassembled into a tuple. It also parses try-delegate more correctly, allowing the delegate to target arbitrary labels, not just other `try`s. There are also a couple superficial differences in the generated label and scratch local names. There are two remaining bugs: First, support for creating DWARF location spans is missing because IRBuilder does not have an API for that yet (but source map locations work fine). Second, IRBuilder generates pops inside nameless blocks in some circumstances involving stacky code. This is currently an IR validation error, so #6950 will have to be resolved before this can land. This change also makes the binary parser significantly slower (by about 50%). The lowest hanging performance fruit seems to be tracking branch targets in IRBuilder to avoid having to scan for branches when finalizing blocks.
There were previously two separate code paths for printing function signatures, one for imported functions and one for declared functions. The only intended difference was that parameter names were printed for declared functions but not for imported functions. Reduce duplication by consolidating the code paths, and add support for printing names for imported function parameters that have them. Also fix a bug where empty names were printed as `$` rather than the correct `$""`.
Rather than back-patching names when we get to the names section in the binary reader, skip ahead to read the names section before anything else so we can use the final names right away. This is a prerequisite for using IRBuilder in the binary reader. The only functional change is that we now allow empty local names. Empty names are perfectly valid.
Previously the interpreter only executed overflow and bounds checks for memory.grow on 32-bit memories. Run the checks on 64-bit memories as well.
CodeFolding previously did not consider br_on_* instructions at all, so it would happily merge tails even if there were br_on_* branches to the same label with non-matching tails. Fix the bug by making any label targeted by any instruction not explicitly handled by CodeFolding unoptimizable. This will gracefully handle other branching instructions like `resume` and `resume_throw` as well. Folding these branches properly is left as future work. Also rename the test file from code-folding_enable-threads.wast to just code-folding.wast and enable all features instead of just threads. The old name was left over from when the test was originally ported to lit, and the new feature is necessary because the new test uses GC instructions.
CodeFolding previously only worked on blocks that did not produce values. It worked on Ifs that produced values, but only by accident; the logic for folding matching tails was not written to support tails producing concrete values, but it happened to work for Ifs because subsequent ReFinalize runs fixed all the incorrect types it produced. Improve the power of the optimization by explicitly handling tails that produce concrete values for both blocks and ifs. Now that the core logic handles concrete values correctly, remove the unnecessary ReFinalize run.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
IRBuilder is a utility for turning arbitrary valid streams of Wasm instructions into valid Binaryen IR. It is already used in the text parser, so now use it in the binary parser as well. Since the IRBuilder API for building each intruction requires only the information that the binary and text formats include as immediates to that instruction, the parser is now much simpler than before. In particular, it does not need to manage a stack of instructions to figure out what the children of each expression should be; IRBuilder handles this instead.
There are some differences between the IR constructed by IRBuilder and the IR the binary parser constructed before this change. Most importantly, IRBuilder generates better multivalue code because it avoids eagerly breaking up multivalue results into individual components that might need to be immediately reassembled into a tuple. It also parses try-delegate more correctly, allowing the delegate to target arbitrary labels, not just other
try
s. There are also a couple superficial differences in the generated label and scratch local names.As part of this change, add support for recording binary source locations in IRBuilder.