Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat!: Rename reactor to imports #35

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 5, 2023
Merged

feat!: Rename reactor to imports #35

merged 2 commits into from
Dec 5, 2023

Conversation

ricochet
Copy link
Contributor

We have established a convention for WASI proposals
to have a world definition called imports.

This change updates the command world to include
an imports world rather than reactor. The goal
is to establish consistency with this change as
well as clear up some confusion around command
vs reactors in this context.

Additionally, this change takes advantage of the include
syntax to include the imports worlds across WASI
proposals.

We have established a convention for WASI proposals
to have a world definition called `imports`.

This change updates the `command` world to include
an `imports` world rather than `reactor`. The goal
is to establish consistency with this change as
well as clear up some confusion around command
vs reactors in this context.

Additionally, this change takes advantage of the `include`
syntax to include the `imports` worlds across WASI
proposals.
@sunfishcode
Copy link
Member

Sounds good.

@sunfishcode sunfishcode merged commit 266876a into main Dec 5, 2023
1 check passed
@sunfishcode sunfishcode deleted the reactor-to-imports branch December 5, 2023 17:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants