Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add definitions for PF_INET, PF_INET6 and PF_UNSPEC #426

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 13, 2023
Merged

Add definitions for PF_INET, PF_INET6 and PF_UNSPEC #426

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 13, 2023

Conversation

loganek
Copy link
Contributor

@loganek loganek commented Jun 29, 2023

Given there are already AF_* definitions, and they are (now) essentially synonyms, we add those definitions to enable compilation of code that already use PF_* macros.

abrown
abrown reviewed Jul 11, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Collaborator

@abrown abrown left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we fix up the removed white spaces? I think with that this diff should be much smaller and I will merge it.

@loganek
Add definitions for PF_INET, PF_INET6 and PF_UNSPEC
79f1851 
Given there are already AF_* definitions, and they are (now) essentially
synonyms, we add those definitions to enable compilation of code that
already use PF_* macros.
@loganek
Copy link
Contributor Author

loganek commented Jul 13, 2023

Can we fix up the removed white spaces? I think with that this diff should be much smaller and I will merge it.

done

abrown
abrown approved these changes Jul 13, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Collaborator

@abrown abrown left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@abrown abrown merged commit 9f51a71 into WebAssembly:main Jul 13, 2023
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@abrown abrown abrown approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@loganek @abrown