Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

653: tidy up is_label_dynamic to return condition directly #675

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 5, 2023

Conversation

lindsay-stevens
Copy link
Contributor

Follow-up to PR #666 comment

Why is this the best possible solution? Were any other approaches considered?

Old way: 5/10, works but looks gross. New way: 10/10

What are the regression risks?

None

Does this change require updates to documentation? If so, please file an issue here and include the link below.

None

Before submitting this PR, please make sure you have:

  • included test cases for core behavior and edge cases in tests
  • run nosetests and verified all tests pass
  • run black pyxform tests to format code
  • verified that any code or assets from external sources are properly credited in comments

@lognaturel lognaturel merged commit 61a4a7d into XLSForm:master Dec 5, 2023
10 checks passed
@lindsay-stevens lindsay-stevens deleted the pyxform-999-fix1 branch December 5, 2023 03:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants