Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

XLS-69d: Simulate #207

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Aug 1, 2024
Merged

XLS-69d: Simulate #207

merged 10 commits into from
Aug 1, 2024

Conversation

mvadari
Copy link
Collaborator

@mvadari mvadari commented Jul 10, 2024

Discussion thread can be found here: #199

@intelliot
Copy link
Collaborator

I think we may want to consider changing/updating this to use the API version 2 format.

(Unrelated: Outside the scope of this spec, I noticed the docs have not yet been updated for API version 2, so I opened this: XRPLF/xrpl-dev-portal#2693)

@mvadari
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mvadari commented Jul 23, 2024

I think we may want to consider changing/updating this to use the API version 2 format.

Is there some part of the spec that doesn't use the APIv2 format? I thought I got everything.

XLS-0069d-simulate/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@intelliot
Copy link
Collaborator

I think the Example Response should be updated to have the transaction data moved under tx_json

@mvadari
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mvadari commented Jul 25, 2024

I think the Example Response should be updated to have the transaction data moved under tx_json

It already is.

I've made some changes to this version that aren't in the discussion, btw.

@mvadari
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mvadari commented Jul 31, 2024

@sappenin this is ready to merge.

@intelliot intelliot merged commit c0fecfa into XRPLF:master Aug 1, 2024
@mvadari mvadari deleted the simulate branch August 2, 2024 16:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants