formalff -setundef: Fix handling for has_srst FFs #4338
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The `has_srst`` case was checking `sig_ce` instead of `sig_srst` due to a copy and paste error. This would crash when `has_ce` was false and could incorrectly determine that an initial value is unused when `has_ce` and `has_srst` are both set.
jix
added
the
merge-after-jf
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The
has_srstcase was checkingsig_ceinstead ofsig_srstdue to a copy and paste error.This would crash when
has_cewas false and could incorrectly determine that an initial value is unused whenhas_ceandhas_srstare both set.