Skip to content

Challenge details, inputs, and results for the SAMPL7 series of challenges

License

MIT, CC-BY-4.0 licenses found

Licenses found

MIT
LICENSE
CC-BY-4.0
LICENSE_other
Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

aakankschit/SAMPL7

 
 

Repository files navigation

The SAMPL7 Blind Prediction Challenges for Computational Chemistry

DOI

Challenge details, inputs, and (eventually) results for the SAMPL7 series (phase) of challenges. Each individual SAMPL7 challenge may be broken up into multiple stages.

See the SAMPL website for information on the Statistical Assessment of the Modeling of Proteins and Ligands (SAMPL) series of challenges as a whole. This repository focuses specifically on the SAMPL7 series of challenges. Additionally, see the SAMPL community on Zenodo for content related to the SAMPL series of challenges. If you wish to use Zenodo to post your presentation slides, datasets, and/or other SAMPL related material, and get a DOI for them, please upload to the community here so that your content will be listed.

Because these files are available publicly, we have no record of who downloads them. Therefore, you should sign up for notifications. Specifically, if you want to receive updates if we uncover any problems, it is imperative that you either (a) sign up for the SAMPL e-mail list, or (b) sign up for notifications of changes to this GitHub repository (the Watch button, above); ideally you would do both. Join our SAMPL7 e-mail list to get e-mails with SAMPL7-related announcements.

Acknowledging and citing SAMPL

If you've benefitted from our work on the SAMPL series of challenges, please be sure to acknowledge our SAMPL NIH grant in any publications/presentations. This funded host-guest experiments, as well as our work organizing and administrating these challenges. You may acknowledge SAMPL by saying something like, "We appreciate the National Institutes of Health for its support of the SAMPL project via R01GM124270 to David L. Mobley (UC Irvine)."

We also ask you to cite the SAMPL dataset(s) you used. These are versioned on Zenodo, and the latest DOI is here: DOI . Click through for access to all data releases. You may cite these sets by their DOI.

Of course, we also appreciate it if you cite any overview/experimental papers relevant to the particular SAMPL challenge you participated in.

SAMPL7 special issues

The SAMPL7 physical properties special issue of JCAMD is now open for submission; deadline is March 31, 2021. Select the "SAMPL7" special issue from the dropdown menu on submission, and be sure your paper title includes "SAMPL7".

The SAMPL7 host-guest special issue is closed for submissions.

What's here

All SAMPL7 challenges are now closed. Note the first phase of the SAMPL8 host-guest challenge is now open on the SAMPL8 GitHub repo.

What's coming

Disclaimers:

  • As usual, we make no warranty as to correctness of protonation states, tautomers, conformations and poses provided in these directories. In some cases the most relevant such states may not be known, or multiple states perhaps should be considered. Please exercise caution and due diligence.
  • We make an effort to indicate which files are original source files, and which are derived files, so that participants can refer to the original source files to help resolve any uncertainties. We encourage participants to do so.
  • While we make every effort to ensure correctness of the files we provide, it is not uncommon for there to be some errors. Please sign up for our e-mail list, since if any critical bugs are found, we will e-mail out appropriate announcements.

Changes and Data Set Versions

Release versions

  • Release 0.1 (July 22, 2019): Finalizes all three host-guest systems and provides sdf, mol2 and PDB files for all guests. Fixes several critical bugs, including fixing several incorrect cyclodextrin-derivative host structure files, fixing errors in a draft TrimerTrip structure file, fixing the SMILES string for TrimerTrip guest g15, and finalizing TrimerTrip guest list.
  • Release 0.1.1 (July 22, 2019, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.3346023): Includes updated README files that should have been in release 0.1.
  • Release 0.1.2 (Sept. 16, 2019, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.3432298): Fixes protonation states for three "modified cyclodextrin" hosts which had accidentally been prepared (and drawn in ChemDraw) with charged groups present as neutral -- specifically terminal -NH3 groups were provided as -NH2. This affected MGLab19, 24 and 34. Also includes minor maintenance fixes -- listing final rather than tentative buffer conditions for GDCC case (just removing the "tentative" on the buffer identity, and correcting pH from 11.5 to 11.7); updates submission deadlines; fixes missing coordinates in TrimerTrip g11; fixing breakdown into residues in a couple modified cyclodextrin host PDB/mol2 files.
  • Release 0.2 (Sept. 24, 2019, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.3459975): Adds host-guest submission template files and instructions; makes more clear which compounds/cases are optional; makes clear that free energy predictions (and uncertainties) are required; enthalpies optional; adds links to host-guest submission system
  • Release 0.3 (Sept. 26, 2019, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.3462865): Corrected likely charges/protonation states for MGLab23 and MGLab24 in overview table and in jpg and PDF files. Updated corresponding coded and noncoded CDX files. Fixed a mixture of UNK and MGO residue names. Eliminates all instances of atom name HQ which should correspond to a carbon (which for some reason was instead named HX in some hosts, likely causing problems for some workflows). This has been mapped to atom name C9. Reconnects missing bonds in the PDB section of several models. See PR 42 for full details. Also removes outdated info in README.md and removes extra guest listed in TrimerTrip submission template.
  • Release 0.4 (Oct. 30, 2019): Adds Isaacs' group TrimerTrip binding data (in host_guest/analysis/ExperimentalMeasurements); adds TrimerTrip submissions; adds PHIP2 protein-ligand challenge Stage 1 details.
  • Release 0.4.1 (Nov. 27, 2019, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.3555601): Fixes and corrects some SMILES formatting errors (see release notes) for protein-ligand challenge, adds host-guest experimental data, adds submission instructions for stage 1 protein-ligand challenge.
  • Relase 0.5 (Aug. 6, 2020, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.3975152): Adds PHIP2 components from 2019; corrects an OctaAcid value; brings in host-guest challenge results and reference calculations; adds details on SAMPL7 physical property (pKa, logP, logD, PAMPA permeability) challenge along with inputs and submission formats.
  • Release 0.6 (Oct. 13, 2020, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.4086044): Release the finalized the physical properties challenge inputs, formats, submissions and experimental results. A later release will include the results of analysis. These changes were all available in master earlier (see detailed changelog in release notes), but this provides an official release. Analysis of physical properties results will come at a later date.
  • Release 0.7 (Changes up to Jan. 14, 2021, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.4706017): Includes the physical properties analysis/plots (for logP and pKa) most participants used in their SAMPL7 papers. These stayed the same until a draft of the overview paper was sent out in April, 2021, at which point two participants noticed sign/units errors in their logP submissions and these were corrected.
  • Release 0.8 (Changes up to March 16, 2021, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.4706020): Includes initial logD analysis as of PR #128
  • Release 1.0 (April 20, 2021, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.4706021): Includes updates to two logP submissions, then corrections to the overall analysis and performance statistics to reflect these changes (as of April 9, 2021). Also includes finalized logD analysis (April 20, 2021).
  • Release 1.1 (Nov. 1, 2021, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.5637494): Updates two logP/logD experimental values (SM41 and SM43) to reflect an error in the experimental values provided us, as discussed in the Ballatore lab corrigendum. Adds PHIP2 protein-ligand analysis.

Changes not in a release

Challenge overview

Recently concluded SAMPL7 challenges included a physical property challenge on pKa, partitioning, and permeability; a protein-ligand component on PHIP2; and host-guest binding on three systems: A pair of Gibb Deep Cavity Cavitands (GDCCs), a new "TrimerTrip" molecule from Lyle Isaacs and his group, and a series of cyclodextrin derivatives from Mike Gilson's group. Each host binds one or more guests, and each system involved a total of 9-20 binding free energy calculations. Additional details are provided below. Several hosts and/or guests were optional. Note that the SAMPL8 host-guest challenge is commencing

The planned later stage of SAMPL7 focused on GSK physical property data was shifted to SAMPL8 because of availability of a more time-sensitive physical property dataset which was used here.

Physical property challenge on pKa, partitioning, and permeability

We recently ran a new SAMPL7 challenge focusing on pKa, partitioning, and permeability. The Ballatore group at UCSD contributed a set of measured water-octanol log P, log D, and pKa values for 22 compounds. They also provided PAMPA permeability values they measured.

pKa prediction will consist of predicting relative free energies between compound microstates (which could be also thought of as the reaction free energy for that particular microstate transition; see pKa instructions). We chose free energies rather than pKa values given the recent work of Gunner et al.. For the purposes of the pKa challenge all possible tautomers of each ionization (charge) state are defined as distinct protonation microstates. Macro pKa values may be submitted to allow for a consistency check.

The partitioning prediction challenge will focus on predicting the difference in free energy for the neutral form between water and octanol. As a part of post prediction analysis challenge oraginzers will combine participant-predicted pKa and log P values to obtain estimated distribution coefficients, which will also be compared against experimental values. Participants may optionally submit their own log D values for a consistency check.

A PAMPA permeability prediction challenge was run in parallel to the pKa and partition coefficient challenge.

All three challenges were optional.

Challenge inputs, submission details and submission templates can be found here.

PHIP2 binding prediction

We recently ran a set of SAMPL7 challenges focusing on protein-ligand binding, in partnership with the XChem facility for fragment screening at Diamond Light Source. The second bromodomain of PHIP (PHIP2) was targeted in an extensive X-ray crystallographic fragment screening experiment, leading to the 3D structures of multiple hits. This SAMPL7 challenge will take advantage of this dataset, addressing computational methods for the discrimination of binders from non-binders, binding pose predictions, and the unique opportunity to select new candidate ligands from a database, to be validated experimentally by X-ray crystallography at the Diamond Light Source (Harwell, UK).

This challenge was broken out into at least three stages on a tight timeline:

  1. Identification of binders from fragment screening
  2. Prediction of fragment binding modes
  3. Selection of new compounds for screening from an experimental database

Gibb Deep Cavity Cavitand (GDCC) binding of guests

One host-guest series was based on the Gibb Deep Cavity Cavitands (GDCCs), familiar from SAMPL4-6. However, this challenge we swap one of the hosts; previously, we used octa acid (OA) and tetramethyl octa acid (TEMOA); this challenge revisits OA but also utilizes a variant which changes the location of the carboxylates. Both were developed in the laboratory of Dr. Bruce Gibb (Tulane U), who will provide binding free energies and enthalpies, measured by ITC. In this case the challenge is to predict binding of eight compounds to exo-OA (a new host created and studied by the Gibb group and first disclosed in this challenge), and two of these to OA; the other six have been studied previously in OA and can optionally be submitted. Existing benchmark datasets based on the OA host may be of interest for those preparing to tackle these new complexes: https://github.com/MobleyLab/benchmarksets; this perpetual review paper also provides a good introduction to the sampling and experimental issues which are known to be relevant in these systems. See the README on this challenge for more details.

Modified acyclic cucurbituril (TrimerTrip) binding of guests

The Isaacs lab contributed data on binding of a series of guests to an acyclic cucubituril host, codenamed "TrimerTrip", as detailed in host_guest/Isaacs_clip. Guests include compounds which overlap with the GDCC and cyclodextrin-derivative challenges, with a total of roughly 15 complexes being examined. See the README on this challenge for more details.

The cyclodextrin derivatives challenge

The Gilson lab imeasured binding of two guests to ten different hosts, comprising beta-cyclodextrin as well as nine different cyclodextrin derivatives which have a single functional group added at one location around the rim of the cavity. Binding is being characterized via ITC and NMR. The two guest compounds (R-rimantadine and trans-4-methylcyclohexanol) overlap with those used in the TrimerTrip and GDCC challenges. Full details are available. Binding to beta-cyclodextrin can optionally be submitted, but literature values for these compounds are available.

MANIFEST

SAMPL-related content

If you give a SAMPL-related talk or presentation or an analysis of its data, and are willing to share publicly, please consider posting on Zenodo and linking it to the SAMPL Zenodo community.

LICENSE

This material here is made available under CC-BY and MIT licenses, as appropriate:

  • MIT for all software/code
  • CC-BY 4.0 for all other materials

About

Challenge details, inputs, and results for the SAMPL7 series of challenges

Resources

License

MIT, CC-BY-4.0 licenses found

Licenses found

MIT
LICENSE
CC-BY-4.0
LICENSE_other

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Packages

No packages published

Languages

  • Python 72.0%
  • TeX 15.1%
  • Mathematica 7.1%
  • Jupyter Notebook 5.8%