Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Customer Review Sentiment Anaylsis #705

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 12, 2024
Merged

Conversation

tanuj437
Copy link
Contributor

Pull Request for ML-Crate 💡

Issue Title: Customer Review Sentiment Anaylsis

  • Info about the related issue (Aim of the project) : To Predict the sentiment of the customer review over a product
  • Name: Tanuj Saxena
  • Email ID for further communication: tanuj.saxena.rks@gmail.com
  • GitHub ID: https://github.com/tanuj437
  • Idenitfy yourself: Contributor SSOC'24

Closes: #698 number that will be closed through this PR

Describe the add-ons or changes you've made 📃

Firstly Did Some EDA like checking all the features set, consider best required one and drop the rest of the feature set. Since the text data so to vectorized it used TF-IDF and trained few model and all model accuracy where around 89-90 only

Type of change ☑️

What sort of change have you made:

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update

How Has This Been Tested? ⚙️

So to test the model i have dump the model in pickle file, which i have used in webapp along with vectorizer as its not efficient to reuse same model to vector the text so used the same preprocessing way, tested with a positive review and the model also predicted the same

Checklist: ☑️

  • My code follows the guidelines of this project.
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code.
  • I have commented my code, particularly wherever it was hard to understand.
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation.
  • My changes generate no new warnings.
  • I have added things that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works.
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules.

Copy link

Our team will soon review your PR. Thanks @tanuj437 :)

Copy link
Owner

@abhisheks008 abhisheks008 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @tanuj437 upload the demo video inside the Web App folder as well as drag and drop the video file from your local system to the README so that others can play the video directly from the README.

@tanuj437 tanuj437 reopened this Jul 12, 2024
@tanuj437
Copy link
Contributor Author

@abhisheks008 Changes made, kindly check it

Copy link
Owner

@abhisheks008 abhisheks008 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @tanuj437 looks good to me. Approved ✅

@abhisheks008 abhisheks008 added Approved ✅ This PR is approved by the PR or, Mentors. Intermediate Points 30 - SSOC 2024 and removed Requested Changes ⚙️ Some changes have been requested in this PR. labels Jul 12, 2024
@abhisheks008 abhisheks008 merged commit 59e975f into abhisheks008:main Jul 12, 2024
@abhisheks008 abhisheks008 added the Points Added 🎉 This issue's points has been added to the leaderboard. label Jul 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Approved ✅ This PR is approved by the PR or, Mentors. Intermediate Points 30 - SSOC 2024 Points Added 🎉 This issue's points has been added to the leaderboard. SSOC
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Customer Review Sentiment Analysis
2 participants