Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ocelots - McKay #16

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Ocelots - McKay #16

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

mckay1818
Copy link

No description provided.

@@ -54,13 +54,14 @@ def test_friends_unique_movies_not_duplicated():

# Assert
assert len(friends_unique_movies) == 3

raise Exception("Test needs to be completed.")
assert INTRIGUE_3 in friends_unique_movies

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice job testing the content, as well

@@ -1,23 +1,121 @@
# ------------- WAVE 1 --------------------

from shutil import move

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why did this line get included?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am actually not sure how this line got into my code! I had never heard of the shutil module until noticing this comment, so this is as much a mystery to me as it is to you!

def create_movie(title, genre, rating):
pass
if title and genre and rating:

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good job making use of "truthiness" to validate against "" and None here

return user_data

def watch_movie(user_data, title):
for movie in user_data["watchlist"]:

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note, while this may work here, it's considered dangerous practice to modify the content of a data structure that you're looping over. Especially in more complex code, this can open you up to complex errors. A simple alternative here could be to save a copy of what you get from movie in user_data["watchlist"] and iterate over that, so that as you modify user_data["watchlist"], there's no risk.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it would be helpful for me to talk through what this alternative would look like in code. Just flagging here that I'll probably swing by your office hours next week to ask about this!

num_of_movies = len(user_data["watched"])
for movie in user_data["watched"]:
total_rating_score += movie["rating"]
if num_of_movies == 0:

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good check on div by zero

else:
genres[movie["genre"]] = 1
#review this concept
return max(genres, key=genres.get)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice use of max() plus using the dict.get() as key to sort your dict!

return total_rating_score / num_of_movies

def get_most_watched_genre(user_data):
genres = {}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice use of a dict as part of your data processing


# -----------------------------------------
# ------------- WAVE 3 --------------------
# -----------------------------------------

def get_unique_watched(user_data):

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could sets have been an alternate to the nested loop logic in these functions?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants