Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Support time.monotonic() and time.monotonic_ns() #382

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 18, 2023
Merged

Support time.monotonic() and time.monotonic_ns() #382

merged 3 commits into from
Sep 18, 2023

Conversation

asottile-sentry
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@asottile-sentry asottile-sentry marked this pull request as ready for review September 14, 2023 14:22
adamchainz
adamchainz reviewed Sep 18, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Owner

@adamchainz adamchainz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, just missing changelog and alphabetizing the source code. I'll take it from here

README.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/_time_machine.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/_time_machine.c Show resolved Hide resolved
src/_time_machine.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/_time_machine.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@adamchainz adamchainz changed the title add time.monotonic support reusing time.time() Support time.monotonic() and time.monotonic_ns() Sep 18, 2023
@adamchainz adamchainz merged commit e2766de into adamchainz:main Sep 18, 2023
6 checks passed
@asottile-sentry asottile-sentry deleted the monotonic branch September 18, 2023 15:04
@adamchainz
Copy link
Owner

THanks for this. Released in 2.13.0.

@mtomilov mtomilov mentioned this pull request Oct 12, 2023
Open
@Mocramis Mocramis mentioned this pull request Nov 22, 2023
Open
@adamchainz adamchainz mentioned this pull request Nov 24, 2023
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@adamchainz adamchainz adamchainz left review comments

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@asottile-sentry @adamchainz