-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 41
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update to Rust 2021, and auto-apply clippy lints #148
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent updates to the codebase focus on modernizing and simplifying the Rust project. Key improvements include upgrading the Rust edition, refining pattern matching, enhancing error handling, and optimizing data structures and method calls for clarity and efficiency. These changes aim to make the code more readable, maintainable, and aligned with current Rust standards. Changes
Poem
Recent Review DetailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Files selected for processing (2)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
@@ -45,15 +44,13 @@ impl fmt::Display for StoreCommand { | |||
struct CappedLineReader<C> { | |||
inner: C, | |||
filled: usize, | |||
buf: [u8; 2048], | |||
buf: Vec<u8>, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tip
Codebase Verification
The extracted content from the test test_capped_line_reader
in the src/protocol/ascii.rs
file shows that the test primarily focuses on the functionality of reading lines correctly using the CappedLineReader
. The test uses a mock reader to simulate input and checks if the CappedLineReader
can correctly parse lines from the input. However, there is no indication that this test assesses memory usage or performance implications of using a Vec<u8>
instead of a fixed-size array.
Given the lack of specific tests or benchmarks addressing the memory usage or performance after changing to Vec<u8>
, we cannot conclusively verify that there are no unintended side effects such as increased memory usage or performance degradation due to this change. It would be advisable to implement or look for additional benchmarks or profiling tests that specifically measure these aspects.
Analysis chain
Replacing fixed-size array with Vec<u8>
in CappedLineReader
struct allows for more flexible buffer management. Ensure that there are no unintended side effects such as increased memory usage or performance degradation.
The search results from the rg
command indicate that the CappedLineReader
struct is indeed present in the src/protocol/ascii.rs
file and is used in various contexts, including instantiation and method implementations. However, the output does not provide direct evidence regarding the impact of replacing a fixed-size array with Vec<u8>
on memory usage or performance.
To further verify the impact of this change, we need to examine the usage patterns of CappedLineReader
and possibly look for any benchmarks or tests that measure memory usage or performance. This will help us determine if there are any reported or observable issues related to the change.
---
The search results indicate that there is a test specifically for the `CappedLineReader` within the `src/protocol/ascii.rs` file. This suggests that there is some level of automated testing in place to verify the functionality of the `CappedLineReader`. However, the output does not provide details on whether this test covers aspects related to memory usage or performance, which are critical in assessing the impact of changing from a fixed-size array to a `Vec<u8>`.
To conclusively verify the impact of this change on memory usage and performance, we need to examine the contents of the test to see if it addresses these concerns.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any reported issues with increased memory usage or performance degradation due to this change.
rg --type rust "CappedLineReader"
Length of output: 365
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for benchmarks or tests related to CappedLineReader
rg --type rust "CappedLineReader" -A 30 -B 30 | rg "bench|test"
Length of output: 223
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Extract the content of the test for CappedLineReader to assess its focus areas
rg --type rust --context 10 "fn test_capped_line_reader" src/protocol/ascii.rs
Length of output: 786
value: V, | ||
options: &Options, | ||
) -> Result<bool, MemcacheError> { | ||
if command == StoreCommand::Cas { | ||
if options.cas.is_none() { | ||
Err(ClientError::Error(Cow::Borrowed( | ||
"cas_id should be present when using cas command", | ||
)))?; | ||
} | ||
if command == StoreCommand::Cas && options.cas.is_none() { | ||
Err(ClientError::Error(Cow::Borrowed( | ||
"cas_id should be present when using cas command", | ||
)))?; | ||
} | ||
let noreply = if options.noreply { " noreply" } else { "" }; | ||
if options.cas.is_some() { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tip
Codebase Verification
The verification process did not find any test cases specifically covering the store
method or CAS operations in the provided codebase. It is recommended to add comprehensive tests to ensure the functionality and error handling of the store
method, especially for edge cases involving CAS operations, are well-tested.
Analysis chain
📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [348-380]
The changes in the store
method, including the check for cas_id
presence and the use of write_all
, improve error handling and data integrity. Ensure that these changes are well-tested, especially in edge cases.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify comprehensive testing of the `store` method, particularly for edge cases involving CAS operations.
rg --type rust "store.*test"
Length of output: 30
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Broaden the search to find any test cases related to the `store` method or CAS operations in the test files.
rg --type rust --files-with-matches 'fn test' | xargs rg 'store|CAS'
Length of output: 703
Avoids a bunch of `return` statements in favor of shorthands. Removes a useless `Arc` indirection, and avoids `Arc::clone` within `get_connection`.
This uses a `Vec` instead, plus iterator chaining, and avoids a `Clone` of the `Connection`.
Thanks for the contribution! At first glance, I want to know if this change is just do the auto apply clippy lints? If so, I want to wait for #147 to be merged to decrease the conflict risks. |
There is a bunch of other optimizations as well, but no rush here. Eventually, I might want to also improve the way that |
That PR is good to go, just needs review. |
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
ClientBuilder
andTlsOptions
.Refactor
client.rs
andconnection.rs
.protocol/ascii.rs
andtests.rs
.Bug Fixes