Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adjustments for v170 #2

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 16, 2024
Merged

Adjustments for v170 #2

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 16, 2024

Conversation

DidacSF
Copy link
Contributor

@DidacSF DidacSF commented Feb 16, 2024

Description

This PR fixes the issues highlighted in #1

Type of changes

  • build: Changes that affect the build system or external dependencies (eg, Cargo, Docker)
  • ci: Changes to CI configuration
  • docs: Changes to documentation only
  • feat: Changes to add a new feature
  • fix: Changes to fix a bug
  • refactor: Changes that do not alter functionality
  • style: Changes to format the code
  • test: Changes to add missing tests or correct existing tests

Checklist

  • Tests for the changes have been added
  • Necessary documentation is added (if appropriate)
  • Formatted with cargo fmt --all
  • Linted with cargo clippy --all-features --all-targets
  • Tested with cargo test --workspace --all-features --all-targets

@DidacSF DidacSF requested a review from clangenb February 16, 2024 10:15
@DidacSF DidacSF linked an issue Feb 16, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link
Contributor

@clangenb clangenb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The changes look good to me, thanks!

I would still like to change the MessageQueue pallet index to 34, this is also how a parity did it for their chains https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/blob/932fc1555e9892c66f8394ee55c63faf4436d7a4/system-parachains/collectives/collectives-polkadot/src/lib.rs#L662.

As we don't have any xcm activity, I would suggest we remove the dmpq-pallet (contrary to parity). Regardless, can you leave the definition of the dmpq-pallet in the construct-runtime macro for future reference of the previously occupied slot?

@DidacSF DidacSF merged commit 27ac240 into develop Feb 16, 2024
3 checks passed
@DidacSF DidacSF deleted the ds/v170-review branch February 16, 2024 11:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

V1.7.0 review
2 participants