Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

legacy NFe 4 - 29/06/2021 xsd for legacy bindings #72

Closed
wants to merge 143 commits into from

Conversation

rvalyi
Copy link
Member

@rvalyi rvalyi commented Jun 1, 2023

transition legacy generateDS nfelib 1.3.1 bindings validate against legacy NFe 4.0.0 schema for which they where generated:
Pacote de Liberação nº 9 (Novo leiaute da NF-e, NT 2020.005, 2020.006 e NT 2021.002). Publicado em 29/06/2021.
This avoids validation errors when trying to validate NFe using the legacy bindings along with the newest schemas.

cc @renatonlima @antoniospneto

add mdfe_dist_dfe schemas and bindings
nfe Pacote nº 9j (NT 2022.003 v.1.00b).
nfe Pacote nº 9k (NT 2023.001 v.1.20)
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 1, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #72 (73393cc) into master (cec8848) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #72   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.58%   98.58%           
=======================================
  Files         224      224           
  Lines       10916    10916           
=======================================
  Hits        10761    10761           
  Misses        155      155           

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

transition legacy generateDS nfelib 1.3.1 bindings
validate against legacy NFe 4.0.0 schema for which they
where generated:
Pacote de Liberação nº 9 (Novo leiaute da NF-e, NT 2020.005, 2020.006 e
NT 2021.002). Publicado em 29/06/2021.
This avoids validation errors when trying to validate NFe using
the legacy bindings along with the newest schemas.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants