-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
IGNITE-22732 Transaction aware SQL #11438
Conversation
|
||
/** */ | ||
@RunWith(Parameterized.class) | ||
public abstract class AbstractTransactionalSqlTest extends GridCommonAbstractTest { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There are no children of this class, only static imports
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Removed
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ public void testCorrelatesAssignedBeforeAccess() { | |||
*/ | |||
@Test | |||
public void testCorrelatesWithTableSpool() { | |||
sql("CREATE TABLE test(i1 INT, i2 INT)"); | |||
sql("CREATE TABLE test(i1 INT, i2 INT) WITH atomicity=transactional"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
atomicity()
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fixed.
@@ -474,6 +446,9 @@ public void testNumericConversion() { | |||
/** */ | |||
@Test | |||
public void testFunctionArgsToNumericImplicitConversion() { | |||
if (sqlTxMode != SqlTransactionMode.NONE) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we add condition like in executeSql
:
if (sqlTxMode != SqlTransactionMode.NONE && tx == null)
startTransaction(ignite);
To assertQuery
to avoid such checks in tests?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
assertQuery has check that tx exists in certain modes.
It required to check that test logic correct and starts tx if required.
I skip two tests in DataTypeTest
with assumeTrue
, because them check only queries without any actual data select.
.setQueryEntities(F.asList(new QueryEntity(Integer.class, AllTypes.class).setTableName("all_types"))) | ||
.setBackups(2) | ||
); | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Redundant NL
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fixed.
Quality Gate failedFailed conditions See analysis details on SonarCloud Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarLint |
Thank you for submitting the pull request to the Apache Ignite.
In order to streamline the review of the contribution
we ask you to ensure the following steps have been taken:
The Contribution Checklist
The description explains WHAT and WHY was made instead of HOW.
The following pattern must be used:
IGNITE-XXXX Change summary
whereXXXX
- number of JIRA issue.(see the Maintainers list)
the
green visa
attached to the JIRA ticket (see TC.Bot: Check PR)Notes
If you need any help, please email dev@ignite.apache.org or ask anу advice on http://asf.slack.com #ignite channel.