Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump h2 from 1.4.197 to 2.2.220 #5395

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 1, 2023
Merged

Conversation

tkobayas
Copy link
Contributor

@tkobayas tkobayas commented Jul 20, 2023

  • Additional fix

referenced Pull Requests:

How to replicate CI configuration locally?

Build Chain tool does "simple" maven build(s), the builds are just Maven commands, but because the repositories relates and depends on each other and any change in API or class method could affect several of those repositories there is a need to use build-chain tool to handle cross repository builds and be sure that we always use latest version of the code for each repository.

build-chain tool is a build tool which can be used on command line locally or in Github Actions workflow(s), in case you need to change multiple repositories and send multiple dependent pull requests related with a change you can easily reproduce the same build by executing it on Github hosted environment or locally in your development environment. See local execution details to get more information about it.

How to retest this PR or trigger a specific build:
  • for pull request checks
    Please add comment: Jenkins retest this

  • for a specific pull request check
    Please add comment: Jenkins (re)run [drools|kogito-runtimes|kogito-apps|kogito-examples] tests

  • for a full downstream build

    • for jenkins job: please add comment: Jenkins run fdb
    • for github actions job: add the label run_fdb
  • a compile downstream build please add comment: Jenkins run cdb

  • a full production downstream build please add comment: Jenkins execute product fdb

  • an upstream build please add comment: Jenkins run upstream

  • for quarkus branch checks
    Run checks against Quarkus current used branch
    Please add comment: Jenkins run quarkus-branch

  • for a quarkus branch specific check
    Run checks against Quarkus current used branch
    Please add comment: Jenkins (re)run [drools|kogito-runtimes|kogito-apps|kogito-examples] quarkus-branch

  • for quarkus main checks
    Run checks against Quarkus main branch
    Please add comment: Jenkins run quarkus-main

  • for a specific quarkus main check
    Run checks against Quarkus main branch
    Please add comment: Jenkins (re)run [drools|kogito-runtimes|kogito-apps|kogito-examples] quarkus-main

  • for quarkus lts checks
    Run checks against Quarkus lts branch
    Please add comment: Jenkins run quarkus-lts

  • for a specific quarkus lts check
    Run checks against Quarkus lts branch
    Please add comment: Jenkins (re)run [drools|kogito-runtimes|kogito-apps|kogito-examples] quarkus-lts

  • for native checks
    Run native checks
    Please add comment: Jenkins run native

  • for a specific native check
    Run native checks
    Please add comment: Jenkins (re)run [drools|kogito-runtimes|kogito-apps|kogito-examples] native

  • for native lts checks
    Run native checks against quarkus lts branch
    Please add comment: Jenkins run native-lts

  • for a specific native lts check
    Run native checks against quarkus lts branch
    Please add comment: Jenkins (re)run [drools|kogito-runtimes|kogito-apps|kogito-examples] native-lts

How to backport a pull request to a different branch?

In order to automatically create a backporting pull request please add one or more labels having the following format backport-<branch-name>, where <branch-name> is the name of the branch where the pull request must be backported to (e.g., backport-7.67.x to backport the original PR to the 7.67.x branch).

NOTE: backporting is an action aiming to move a change (usually a commit) from a branch (usually the main one) to another one, which is generally referring to a still maintained release branch. Keeping it simple: it is about to move a specific change or a set of them from one branch to another.

Once the original pull request is successfully merged, the automated action will create one backporting pull request per each label (with the previous format) that has been added.

If something goes wrong, the author will be notified and at this point a manual backporting is needed.

NOTE: this automated backporting is triggered whenever a pull request on main branch is labeled or closed, but both conditions must be satisfied to get the new PR created.

@tkobayas
Copy link
Contributor Author

Jenkins retest this

<maven.jdbc.url>jdbc:h2:mem:test</maven.jdbc.url>
<!-- appending ;MODE=LEGACY;OLD_INFORMATION_SCHEMA=TRUE to the jdbc url is necessary to workaround the problem reported at -->
<!-- https://github.com/h2database/h2database/issues/3325 -->
<maven.jdbc.url>jdbc:h2:mem:test;MODE=LEGACY;OLD_INFORMATION_SCHEMA=TRUE</maven.jdbc.url>
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tkobayas tkobayas Jul 25, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Without OLD_INFORMATION_SCHEMA=TRUE, we get a WARN

org.h2.jdbc.JdbcSQLSyntaxErrorException: Constraint "FKMMLTGQ2X8CCXFI7PE0682083U" already exists; SQL statement:
alter table public.TransactionTestObject add constraint FKmmltgq2x8ccxfi7pe0682083u foreign key (subObject_ID) references public.TransactionTestObject [90045-220]
...

because Hibernate issues alter table public.TransactionTestObject add constraint FKmmltgq2x8ccxfi7pe0682083u foreign key (subObject_ID) references public.TransactionTestObject on Persistence.createEntityManagerFactory even though the constraint exists. The alter is not issued in Hibernate 5.6.12.Final (used in drools main as of 8.41.0.Final), so we will be able to remove the option when we upgrade Hibernate. Anyway, it's WARN and tests don't fail.

With OLD_INFORMATION_SCHEMA=TRUE, we get a WARN

2023-07-25 13:00:05,630 [Periodic Recovery] [jta] WARN  ARJUNA016027: Local XARecoveryModule.xaRecovery got XA exception XAException.XAER_RMERR
javax.transaction.xa.XAException: null
	at org.h2.jdbcx.JdbcXAConnection.recover(JdbcXAConnection.java:207)
	at com.arjuna.ats.internal.jta.recovery.arjunacore.XARecoveryModule.xaRecoveryFirstPass(XARecoveryModule.java:609)
	at com.arjuna.ats.internal.jta.recovery.arjunacore.XARecoveryModule.periodicWorkFirstPass(XARecoveryModule.java:201)
	at com.arjuna.ats.internal.jta.recovery.arjunacore.XARecoveryModule.periodicWorkFirstPass(XARecoveryModule.java:146)
	at com.arjuna.ats.internal.arjuna.recovery.PeriodicRecovery.doWorkInternal(PeriodicRecovery.java:765)
	at com.arjuna.ats.internal.arjuna.recovery.PeriodicRecovery.run(PeriodicRecovery.java:377)
Caused by: org.h2.jdbc.JdbcSQLSyntaxErrorException: Column "TRANSACTION_NAME" not found; SQL statement:
SELECT * FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.IN_DOUBT ORDER BY TRANSACTION_NAME [42122-220]

It likely means XA recovery doesn't work with this configuration, but it's not covered by drools persistence tests (H2 is not for production anyway). For this PR, I chose this option because the WARN message is less verbose.

@gmunozfe gmunozfe self-requested a review July 25, 2023 10:11
@gmunozfe
Copy link
Contributor

@tkobayas I think this line could be enhanced with the option -ifNotExists (it should fail with h2 version over 200, because it's needed to auto-create database)

https://github.com/kiegroup/drools/blob/2e19ab357483f4d10ad7f7b35ab4977429a8600f/kie-test-util/src/main/java/org/kie/test/util/db/PersistenceUtil.java#L250

realH2Server = Server.createTcpServer(new String[]{"-ifNotExists"});

@tkobayas
Copy link
Contributor Author

@gmunozfe Thank you! Applied the suggestion.

@tkobayas
Copy link
Contributor Author

GHA Java 8, Java 11 : Not related to this PR (flaky)

2023-07-26T03:15:16.4642756Z [ERROR] testAggregatedAndDispose[KieBase type=STREAM_IDENTITY](org.drools.mvel.integrationtests.MBeansMonitoringTest)  Time elapsed: 0.218 s  <<< FAILURE!
2023-07-26T03:15:16.4653413Z org.junit.ComparisonFailure: expected:<[tru]e> but was:<[fals]e>

Copy link
Contributor

@gmunozfe gmunozfe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me, fantastic work @tkobayas !

Copy link
Contributor

@Ginxo Ginxo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@Ginxo Ginxo added backport-7.67.x Generate backport PR for 7.67.x branch backport-7.67.x-blue Generate backport PR for 7.67.x-blue branch and removed backport-7.67.x Generate backport PR for 7.67.x branch backport-7.67.x-blue Generate backport PR for 7.67.x-blue branch labels Aug 1, 2023
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 1, 2023
* Bump h2 from 1.4.197 to 2.2.220

- Additional fix

* - add ifNotExists
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 1, 2023
* Bump h2 from 1.4.197 to 2.2.220

- Additional fix

* - add ifNotExists
danielezonca pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2023
* Bump h2 from 1.4.197 to 2.2.220

- Additional fix

* - add ifNotExists

Co-authored-by: Toshiya Kobayashi <toshiyakobayashi@gmail.com>
danielezonca pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2023
* Bump h2 from 1.4.197 to 2.2.220

- Additional fix

* - add ifNotExists

Co-authored-by: Toshiya Kobayashi <toshiyakobayashi@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport-7.67.x Generate backport PR for 7.67.x branch backport-7.67.x-blue Generate backport PR for 7.67.x-blue branch
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants