To explore the syntax of FORTRAN and learn a legacy language.
In Schroeder's Thermal Physics Problem 2.9, we were tasked by the author to recreate the same Figure 2.4 and then determine the most and least probable macrostate, along with their respective probabilities.
For our FORTRAN exercise, we aim to become familiar with FORTRAN syntax by solving the Total Multiplicity
for six harmonic oscillators and four harmonic oscillators in each Einstein Solid, with a total of six energy units.
The original approach to solving this problem (back in October 2021) involved using Excel to generate the figures and address the remaining challenges.
It was relatively simple to set up and generate figures without the need for pip install pandas
or other Python packages. To tackle this problem using a more challenging approach, we considered doing it the FORTRAN way.
The FORTRAN approach (Checkout the .f90 file here!) successfully achieved the same Total Multiplicity
as the original way (a total multiplicity of 5005) with the same input. Below is a pseudocode representation of the actual FORTRAN code.
Program MultiplicityCalculator
Initialize n_A, n_B, q_A, q_B, q_Total, Omega_A, Omega_B, Multiplicity, TotalMultiplicity
Input n_A, n_B, q_Total
q_A = 0
q_B = q_Total
TotalMultiplicity = 0
while q_A is not equal to q_Total + 1
Calculate Omega_A using comb(q_A + n_A - 1, q_A)
Calculate Omega_B using comb(q_B + n_B - 1, q_B)
Calculate Multiplicity as Omega_A * Omega_B
Print q_A, Omega_A, q_B, Omega_B, Multiplicity
Increment q_A by 1
Decrement q_B by 1
Add Multiplicity to TotalMultiplicity
Print the total Multiplicity
Contains
Define comb(n, r) function
// Combination function implementation
Define fact(n1) function
// Factorial function implementation
End Program MultiplicityCalculator
This concludes the FORTRAN exercise.
Similar code structure was implemented in Python and was able to yield the same Total Multiplicity
for Problem 2.9, validating its functionality. The Python code successfully ran for both Problem 2.9 and Problem 2.10. However, the FORTRAN code failed to achieve the same Total Multiplicity
for Problem 2.10, particularly when handling larger integer numbers.
The error is likely due to the fact that 50!
is a very large factorial number, and it exceeds the capacity of the integer variable, resulting in a floating-point error message.
If anyone can find a solution to this problem, please feel free to submit a pull request.