fix(custom-resources): correctly convert values to Date type

[sakurai-ryo]

Description

The following issue reports an error that occurs when calling an API that takes the Date type as a parameter, such as GetMetricData API, from a Custom Resource Lambda function, where the parameter is passed as string type to the AWS SDK.
#27962
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSJavaScriptSDK/v3/latest/client/cloudwatch/command/GetMetricDataCommand/#:~:text=Description-,EndTime,-Required

To resolve this error, the string type must be properly converted to Date type when calling the AWS SDK from Lambda.
In this PR, I added the conversion to Date type in the same way as the existing conversion to number and Uint8Array types.
Uint8Array: #27034
number: #27112

Major changes

update-sdkv3-parameters-model.ts script

If the type is timestamp in the smithy specification, write d to the state machine so that it can be converted to a Date type later.
https://smithy.io/2.0/spec/simple-types.html#timestamp

update-sdkv3-parameters-model.sh script was not called from anywhere, so I called it manually and updated the JSON file.
Please let me know if there is a problem.

sdk-v2-to-v3-adapter module

I added code to convert value marked d in state machine to Date type.
If the conversion to Date type fails, the Date class does not throw an exception, so the error is handled in a slightly tricky way.
Also added a unit test for this process.

integ-tests-alpha module

Added integ-test to verify that errors reported in the related issue have been resolved.
The IAM Policy added internally by the call to adPolicyStatementFromSdkCall looks like the following and does not call GetMetricData correctly, so the addToRolePolicy method was used to explicitly add a new Policy is added explicitly with the addToRolePolicy method.

{
    "Version": "2012-10-17",
    "Statement": [
        {
            "Action": [
                "monitoring:GetMetricData"
            ],
            "Resource": [
                "*"
            ],
            "Effect": "Allow"
        }
    ]
}

aws-cdk/packages/aws-cdk-lib/custom-resources/lib/helpers-internal/sdk-v3-metadata.json

Line 174 in 1a9c30e

"iamPrefix": "monitoring"

fixes #27962

---

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license

[aws-cdk-automation]

The pull request linter has failed. See the aws-cdk-automation comment below for failure reasons. If you believe this pull request should receive an exemption, please comment and provide a justification.

A comment requesting an exemption should contain the text Exemption Request. Additionally, if clarification is needed add Clarification Request to a comment.

[sakurai-ryo]

Exemption Request: Since this PR is an internal behavior fix, I don't think it is necessary to change the README.

✅ Updated pull request passes all PRLinter validations. Dismissing previous PRLinter review.

[kaizencc]

Thank you for the very detailed PR @sakurai-ryo! This looks mostly reasonable to me, but because I'm not too familiar with this part of our repo I'm going to toss it over to @mrgrain or @MrArnoldPalmer for a second look.

[kaizencc]

Suggested change

	return isShape('timestamp')(shape)
	return isShape('timestamp')(shape);

[sakurai-ryo]

Oops, I fixed it.

[kaizencc]

Mostly because I'm not too familiar with this section of the repo, can you explain how you arrived at these updates?

[mrgrain]

Should be coming from running the update-sdkv3-parameters-model.sh script.

[kaizencc]

As well as these updates...

[mrgrain]

Should be coming from running the update-sdkv3-parameters-model.sh script.

[paulhcsun]

@sakurai-ryo There are some merge conflicts that need to be addressed. The changes look good to me, @kaizencc @mrgrain are there any other questions or changes to be made?

[sakurai-ryo]

Thanks @paulhcsun! Fixed conflicts.

[paulhcsun]

hey @sakurai-ryo,

Apologies for not getting around to this. It doesn't seem like there are any other major concerns and I'm good to merge this in. It seems like the integ snapshots are outdated. Could you rerun with latest changes to update those? I'll keep an eye on this and approve when the build is happy.

[aws-cdk-automation]

The pull request linter has failed. See the aws-cdk-automation comment below for failure reasons. If you believe this pull request should receive an exemption, please comment and provide a justification.

A comment requesting an exemption should contain the text Exemption Request. Additionally, if clarification is needed add Clarification Request to a comment.

✅ Updated pull request passes all PRLinter validations. Dismissing previous PRLinter review.

[sakurai-ryo]

Hi @paulhcsun
I know the CDK team is busy, so that's not a problem at all.
Thanks for taking care of this PR.
I fixed the conflicts, please check it out.

[paulhcsun]

Thanks for this fix @sakurai-ryo! And thanks again for your patience and understanding.

[aws-cdk-automation]

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

• CodeBuild project: AutoBuildv2Project1C6BFA3F-wQm2hXv2jqQv
• Commit ID: 45c475e
• Result: SUCCEEDED
• Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

[mergify]

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).