io_uring engine: 'atomic_load_relaxed' instead of 'atomic_load_acquire' #1605
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
motivation here is that we do not have here any explicit READ dependency on atomic load because actually we just need in these places only operation to perform atomically without any explicit barriers given by memory model Signed-off-by: Denis Pronin <dannftk@yandex.ru>
|
@axboe I have no idea how changes in |
|
Test 10 is known flaky, so not related and nothing to worry about. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
motivation here is that we do not have here any explicit READ dependency
on atomic load because actually we just need in these places only
operation to perform atomically without any explicit barriers given by
memory model
Signed-off-by: Denis Pronin dannftk@yandex.ru