Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add sui testnet #483

Open
wants to merge 27 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

feat: add sui testnet #483

wants to merge 27 commits into from

Conversation

blockchainguyy
Copy link
Contributor

@blockchainguyy blockchainguyy marked this pull request as ready for review December 20, 2024 13:32
@blockchainguyy blockchainguyy requested a review from a team as a code owner December 20, 2024 13:32
@blockchainguyy blockchainguyy removed the request for review from a team December 20, 2024 13:32
Base automatically changed from talal/testnet-its to main December 20, 2024 23:48
"deployer": "0x6f24A47Fc8AE5441Eb47EFfC3665e70e69Ac3F05",
"tokenManagerDeployer": "0x121b0e54Cd7ad2BBCb4c4C9275697978EBaF3653",
"tokenManagerDeployer": "0x3d36C02D7EE86F25565f319E71641CEFeD0eac81",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why are these changes part of this PR? Do you need to change the base branch?

"Gateway_v0": "0x7fa977e8174494413834a2bafd5b46e07049c02d73e771bc00e58a31ef7895be::gateway_v0::Gateway_v0",
"CommandType": "0x7fa977e8174494413834a2bafd5b46e07049c02d73e771bc00e58a31ef7895be::gateway_v1::CommandType",
"Gateway": "0x7fa977e8174494413834a2bafd5b46e07049c02d73e771bc00e58a31ef7895be::gateway::Gateway",
"Gateway_v1": "0x7fa977e8174494413834a2bafd5b46e07049c02d73e771bc00e58a31ef7895be::gateway_v1::Gateway_v1"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why is Gateway_v1 included here? Did you use the wrong Sui release/upgradability test release instead of v1.0.1?

Comment on lines +2336 to +2338
"versions": [
"0x7fa977e8174494413834a2bafd5b46e07049c02d73e771bc00e58a31ef7895be"
],
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

make versions into a dictionary mapping version number to package id, makes it more obvious instead of relying on the implicit version index

"OwnerCap": "0x7d71d070eeea0eeaca7a44f52747b2e9942c9d3fa921093ed5e5abd7bec5562c"
}
},
"ITS": {
Copy link
Member

@milapsheth milapsheth Dec 23, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why was ITS deployed? ITS release hasn't been created yet. Shouldn't include invalid contracts in the config. Was this address registered on the ITS hub as well?

"GasServicev0": "0x737706f16c72f9110916f266714967e518868b4dbf08774c1a487b4ccc2971e8"
}
},
"Abi": {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Abi is needed for ITS, so should only be deployed when ITS needs to be deployed

"address": "axelar1kleasry5ed73a8u4q6tdeu80hquy4nplfnrntx3n6agm2tcx40fssjk7gj"
"codeId": 18,
"domainSeparator": "0xf221c54a1a478f48c840a24cf2b96f77c9bc369a40570744b8fedd91df001624",
"address": "axelar19ew05xx796gp7xkzx5z592cp0s7lg58gypaas3u2pwunmyjdyytqxq886u"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

when deploying on mainnet, make sure the address matches

"storeCodeProposalCodeHash": "d9412440820a51bc48bf41a77ae39cfb33101ddc6562323845627ea2042bf708",
"lastUploadedCodeId": 26
},
"InterchainTokenService": {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

use the right base branch for the PR so unrelated changes aren't included

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants